Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Did they rape Flynn or something during the investigation? I can see you are having a hard time under duress.Another idiot who thinks "duress" means physical torture.Hogwash.HorseshitA plea made under duress cannot be considered an admission of anything, shit for brains.if there is no signs of lying that means a lie cannot be proven derp boyAnd what exactly does "no physical signs of being untruthful." mean derp head?the FBI interviewers said Flynn did not lie.None of that changes the fact that Flynn lied, was fired from the admin for doing so, was charged and pleaded guilty. Twice.View attachment 333976
~~~~~~
Judge Overseeing Michael Flynn’s Sentencing Just Dropped A Bombshell
The sentencing memorandum reveals for the first time concrete evidence that the FBI created multiple summaries of Michael Flynn’s questioning.thefederalist.com
DOJ Admits in Michael Flynn Case That FBI ‘Mistakenly Identified’ Peter Strzok Notes
The attorneys prosecuting former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn were forced to admit in a Tuesday letter to Flynn’s legal defense that the notes which formed the official document describing Flynn’s January 2017 interview were not written by agent Peter Strzok, as they've...news.yahoo.com
Neither of those links say anything about Flynn's son, dope.They did not say that at all, dope.
They said he showed no physical signs of being untruthful.
IF YOU AREN'T THE DOPE WHY IS THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DROPPING THE CHRGES AND THE fbi IN TROUBLE?Derp...
It means exactly what it says. It means Flynn is a good liar.
They already knew the truth when they asked Flynn the question, dope.
a lie is something you do when posting countless TDS influenced posts something like Schiff's witch hunt Sham.Except for his own admission that he lied made in federal court, dope.
They said they would have to question him properly because the Obama admin wouldn't approve.
They were disgusting it between themselves.
Now people are interrogated for hours without a drink of water, that is under duress. He was a not under duress.
What are Some Examples of Duress?
Duress can come in many forms and can arise in many different situations. Some of these may include:
Economic pressure can be an actual threat, like threatening to empty the defendant’s bank account and they have the power to do it.
- A person being held at gunpoint and forced to drive their car over the speed limit;
- A person being held at knife point and forced to steal an item from a store or rob a person;
- Threatening to strike someone if they do not perform some sort of illegal act;
- Use of economic pressure or threats to accomplish something with the person; and
- Various other forms of conduct.
Duress as a Defense
You don’t have a clue of what you are talking about. Flynn was not under heavy duress. He was not even handcuffed. You don’t interrogate a general just like how you interrogate a murder suspect. Regardless how you twisted this Flynn garbages. This is a total complete corruption of American justice system by Trump administration.
Nearly 2,000 ex-Justice Department employees sign letter criticizing Barr for moving to drop Flynn charges
Nearly 2,000 former Justice Department employees criticized Attorney General William Barr for moving to drop the charges against former national security adviser Michael Flynn last week, saying in an open letter published Monday that Barr had "assaulted the rule of law" and calling for him to...amp.cnn.com
Washington(CNN)Nearly 2,000 former Justice Department employees criticized Attorney General William Barr for moving to drop the charges against former national security adviser Michael Flynn last week, saying in an open letter published Monday that Barr had "assaulted the rule of law" and calling for him to resign.
Truth is out side here there’s nobody defending Flynn or Trump. It will go down in history and election that Barr and Trump RAPE the American justice system. That is how Americans will look at this. Clear and simple corruptions.
It will go down in history and election that Barr and Trump RAPE the American justice system.
Nah.
Additionally, prior to the interview, there were internal FBI discussions about whether to show Mr. Flynn the transcripts of his calls with Mr. Kislyak. In light of the fact that the FBI already had these transcripts in its possessions, Mr. Flynn’s answers would have shed no light on whether and what he communicated with Mr. Kislyak.—and those issues were immaterial to the no longer justifiably predicated counterintelligence investigation. Similarly, whether Mr. Flynn did or “did not recall” (ECF No. 1) communications already known by the FBI was assuredly not material.
Under these circumstances, the Government cannot explain, much less prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, how false statements are “material” to an investigation that—as explained above—seems to have been undertaken only to elicit those very false statements and thereby criminalize Mr. Flynn. Although it does not matter that the FBI knew the truth and therefore was not deceived by Mr. Flynn’s statements, see United States v. Safavian, 649 F.3d 688, 691-92 (D.C. Cir. 2011), a false statement must still “be capable of influencing an agency function or decision,” United States v. Moore, 612 F.3d 698, 702 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (citations and quotation mark omitted). Even if he told the truth, Mr. Flynn’s statements could not have conceivably “influenced” an investigation that had neither a legitimate counterintelligence nor criminal purpose. See United States v. Mancuso, 485 F.2d 275, 281 (2d Cir. 1973) (“Neither the answer he in fact gave nor the truth he allegedly concealed could have impeded or furthered the investigation.”); cf. United States v. Hansen, 772 F.2d 940, 949 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (noting that a lie can be material absent an existing investigation so long as it might “influenc[e] the possibility that an investigation might commence.”). Accordingly, a review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information, indicates that Mr. Flynn’s statements were never “material” to any FBI investigation.
