Breaking News:Flynn Case Being Dropped

A true travesty of justice.... demoquack style

He was so guilty.
Guilty of what?
Flynn pled guilty twice to lying to the FBI.
he lied under duress it's been known since the beginning
Meaning he was forced to admit he lied even though the interviewers even admitted he didn't lie.
The DOJ is not claiming that, dope.
 
A true travesty of justice.... demoquack style

He was so guilty.
Guilty of what?
Flynn pled guilty twice to lying to the FBI.
he lied under duress it's been known since the beginning
Meaning he was forced to admit he lied even though the interviewers even admitted he didn't lie.
The DOJ is not claiming that, dope.
Dumbass I never said that about the DOJ stupid fuck
 
A true travesty of justice.... demoquack style

He was so guilty.
Guilty of what?
Flynn pled guilty twice to lying to the FBI.
he lied under duress it's been known since the beginning
Meaning he was forced to admit he lied even though the interviewers even admitted he didn't lie.
The DOJ is not claiming that, dope.
Dumbass I never said that about the DOJ stupid fuck
Your argument of "duress" is irrelevant to anything, dope.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
And this

In a single sentence filing to the court, Van Grack informed federal Judge Emmet Sullivan that he would be quitting the case.
/——-/ Breaking:
Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.
List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them
Unmasking is NOT illegal.

What does ‘unmasking’ someone in an intel report mean?

In 2016, Obama administration officials received intelligence reports that were concerning, but incomplete.

Surveillance of Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. revealed he had interacted with an unnamed American who may have been undercutting efforts to pressure Vladimir Putin’s government.

Using a common process known as “unmasking,” they asked intelligence agencies to reveal the American’s name. It was Michael Flynn, an adviser to President-elect Donald Trump.

There is nothing illegal about unmasking and the declassified document states that proper procedures were followed. While Trump casts unmasking as sinister, his administration has used the process more frequently than Obama’s.

where? where has the trump admin use this tactic?
 
And this

In a single sentence filing to the court, Van Grack informed federal Judge Emmet Sullivan that he would be quitting the case.
/——-/ Breaking:
Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.
List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them
Unmasking is NOT illegal.

What does ‘unmasking’ someone in an intel report mean?

In 2016, Obama administration officials received intelligence reports that were concerning, but incomplete.

Surveillance of Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. revealed he had interacted with an unnamed American who may have been undercutting efforts to pressure Vladimir Putin’s government.

Using a common process known as “unmasking,” they asked intelligence agencies to reveal the American’s name. It was Michael Flynn, an adviser to President-elect Donald Trump.

There is nothing illegal about unmasking and the declassified document states that proper procedures were followed. While Trump casts unmasking as sinister, his administration has used the process more frequently than Obama’s.

where? where has the trump admin use this tactic?


Intelligence officials asked the National Security Agency to unmask the identities of Americans in surveillance-based intelligence reports 16,721 times last year — a significant rise from a year earlier, a new report revealed on Tuesday.

Uh oh.
 
And this

In a single sentence filing to the court, Van Grack informed federal Judge Emmet Sullivan that he would be quitting the case.
/——-/ Breaking:
Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.
List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them
Unmasking is NOT illegal.

What does ‘unmasking’ someone in an intel report mean?

In 2016, Obama administration officials received intelligence reports that were concerning, but incomplete.

Surveillance of Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. revealed he had interacted with an unnamed American who may have been undercutting efforts to pressure Vladimir Putin’s government.

Using a common process known as “unmasking,” they asked intelligence agencies to reveal the American’s name. It was Michael Flynn, an adviser to President-elect Donald Trump.

There is nothing illegal about unmasking and the declassified document states that proper procedures were followed. While Trump casts unmasking as sinister, his administration has used the process more frequently than Obama’s.

where? where has the trump admin use this tactic?


Intelligence officials asked the National Security Agency to unmask the identities of Americans in surveillance-based intelligence reports 16,721 times last year — a significant rise from a year earlier, a new report revealed on Tuesday.

Uh oh.
You mean during the time the Russian investigation by Mueller was under way?
 
And this

In a single sentence filing to the court, Van Grack informed federal Judge Emmet Sullivan that he would be quitting the case.
/——-/ Breaking:
Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.
List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them
Unmasking is NOT illegal.

What does ‘unmasking’ someone in an intel report mean?

In 2016, Obama administration officials received intelligence reports that were concerning, but incomplete.

Surveillance of Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. revealed he had interacted with an unnamed American who may have been undercutting efforts to pressure Vladimir Putin’s government.

Using a common process known as “unmasking,” they asked intelligence agencies to reveal the American’s name. It was Michael Flynn, an adviser to President-elect Donald Trump.

There is nothing illegal about unmasking and the declassified document states that proper procedures were followed. While Trump casts unmasking as sinister, his administration has used the process more frequently than Obama’s.

where? where has the trump admin use this tactic?


Intelligence officials asked the National Security Agency to unmask the identities of Americans in surveillance-based intelligence reports 16,721 times last year — a significant rise from a year earlier, a new report revealed on Tuesday.

Uh oh.
guess we'll see, huh?
 

Intelligence officials asked the National Security Agency to unmask the identities of Americans in surveillance-based intelligence reports 16,721 times last year — a significant rise from a year earlier, a new report revealed on Tuesday.

Uh oh.
You mean during the time the Russian investigation by Mueller was under way?

The number of U.S. person identities that NSA unmasked in response to a specific request from another agency 9,217 9,529 16,721

The numbers represent calendar year 2016, 2017 and 2018.

They went up bigly since Obama.

 

Intelligence officials asked the National Security Agency to unmask the identities of Americans in surveillance-based intelligence reports 16,721 times last year — a significant rise from a year earlier, a new report revealed on Tuesday.

Uh oh.
You mean during the time the Russian investigation by Mueller was under way?

The number of U.S. person identities that NSA unmasked in response to a specific request from another agency 9,217 9,529 16,721

The numbers represent calendar year 2016, 2017 and 2018.

They went up bigly since Obama.


Too funny.
We will probably still see Trump supporters declaring that unmasking is illegal...
 
All that's left is to screw the bad guys who pulled this travesty of justice as hard as they screwed Flynn.

They are requesting it be dropped. It still needs to be adjudicated.
What the hell needs to be "adjudicated?" The DOJ has the authority to drop a case.
Derp....
He's plead guilty in federal court. He's convicted of a federal felony, dope.
He withdrew his guilty plea, so they were back to square one.
Derp....
He's already convicted, dope. He was awaiting sentencing.
No, he's not convicted. The DOJ dropped the charges. Don't you know what that means?

Gawd your a dope.
He was convicted and awaiting sentencing, dope. He plead guilty. The judge will need to vacate the conviction. If he is so inclined.
He withdrew his plea, moron. What part of that don't you understand? There is no conviction to vacate.
LOL...
Once he plead guilty and the judge signed off, he was convicted, dope. The only reason he's not behind bars is his cooperation agreement that is holding up his sentencing.

Do you imagine any convict can simply say the wish to change their plea and get out of their conviction?
Idiot
Hmmmm, no. he withdrew his plea, jackass. How many times do you have to be told?
LOL...
One must be convicted before they can be sentenced.
A convict can not simply withdraw their plea and go free, dope.
They can when exculpatory evedince is found. Moron.
LOL...
Let us know when that happens.
It happened last week. You ignoring it didn’t make it go away.
LOL...

You saying it is in no way makes it so.
The documents provided recently say you’re full of shit.
He plead guilty and is convicted. Those documents don't change that.
He plead guilty to protect his son.
So?
Why is that important?
That means he took a fall for his son. who has a new born son . Guess you don't have children
That means he took a fall for his son. who has a new born son . Guess you don't have children
I do. They just don't commit federal felonies that I have to cover for.
He didn’t commit a felony. They admitted it in the original 302 which went missing until Durham finally got hold of it.
He didn’t commit a felony. They admitted it in the original 302 which went missing until Durham finally got hold of it.

Says who?



~~~~~~


Neither of those links say anything about Flynn's son, dope.
View attachment 333976
None of that changes the fact that Flynn lied, was fired from the admin for doing so, was charged and pleaded guilty. Twice.
the FBI interviewers said Flynn did not lie.
the FBI interviewers said Flynn did not lie.
They did not say that at all, dope.
They said he showed no physical signs of being untruthful.
And what exactly does "no physical signs of being untruthful." mean derp head?
IF YOU AREN'T THE DOPE WHY IS THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DROPPING THE CHRGES AND THE fbi IN TROUBLE?
And what exactly does "no physical signs of being untruthful." mean derp head?
Derp...
It means exactly what it says. It means Flynn is a good liar.
They already knew the truth when they asked Flynn the question, dope.
if there is no signs of lying that means a lie cannot be proven derp boy
a lie is something you do when posting countless TDS influenced posts something like Schiff's witch hunt Sham.
if there is no signs of lying that means a lie cannot be proven derp boy
Except for his own admission that he lied made in federal court, dope.
A plea made under duress cannot be considered an admission of anything, shit for brains.

They said they would have to question him properly because the Obama admin wouldn't approve.
They were disgusting it between themselves.

Now people are interrogated for hours without a drink of water, that is under duress. He was a not under duress.
Horseshit
What are Some Examples of Duress?
Duress can come in many forms and can arise in many different situations. Some of these may include:

  • A person being held at gunpoint and forced to drive their car over the speed limit;
  • A person being held at knife point and forced to steal an item from a store or rob a person;
  • Threatening to strike someone if they do not perform some sort of illegal act;
  • Use of economic pressure or threats to accomplish something with the person; and
  • Various other forms of conduct.
Economic pressure can be an actual threat, like threatening to empty the defendant’s bank account and they have the power to do it.


Duress as a Defense
Hogwash.
You don’t have a clue of what you are talking about. Flynn was not under heavy duress. He was not even handcuffed. You don’t interrogate a general just like how you interrogate a murder suspect. Regardless how you twisted this Flynn garbages. This is a total complete corruption of American justice system by Trump administration.



Washington(CNN)Nearly 2,000 former Justice Department employees criticized Attorney General William Barr for moving to drop the charges against former national security adviser Michael Flynn last week, saying in an open letter published Monday that Barr had "assaulted the rule of law" and calling for him to resign.
And you believe that proves what?
Threatening to investigate a family member unless you do what you're told to do would put a person under duress.

Was that before he lied to the FBI and Pence?

Also I think his dealings with foregin countries is worst.
Double jeapardy eh ? Yeah that's the way we should be in this nation, just keep trying until something sticks. LOL. So pathetic that's it's well pathetic.
 
Double jeapardy eh ?
That's not double jeopardy. That's a different crime entirely. Man, we sure do have a lot of Trump U graduate lawyers in this thread....

Do you find it odd at all that you are defending Flynn? The convicted liar? The disgraced former general who became a foreign agent for our adversaries? Don't you find that odd?
 
My children wouldn't commit federal felonies. They would never be in such a position.
In the Obama "Justice" Dept, whether one had actually, you know, committed the felonies was beside the point.
In the Obama "Justice" Dept, whether one had actually, you know, committed the felonies was beside the point.

If he didn't then there was no reason for Daddy to cover for him.
again it doesn't matter with a thug administration they had limitless funds, you have to pay a lawyer who do you believe will run out of money first?
again it doesn't matter with a thug administration they had limitless funds, you have to pay a lawyer who do you believe will run out of money first?
Again. Flynn could have easily foiled the plot by being truthful.
He was truthful just ask the agents that interviewed him....why are you taking the word of Comey the clown over the agents that were with Flynn?....
He was truthful just ask the agents that interviewed him...
Sure. That's why he pleaded guilty. Twice.
He pleaded guilty to save what funds he had left....they beat him down...a decorated war hero...and look at your disgusting self....the truth is out pal...you just are in total denial.....OBAMA GATE!!!!!
He pleaded guilty to save what funds he had left....they beat him down...a decorated war hero...and look at your disgusting self....the truth is out pal...you just are in total denial.....OBAMA GATE!!!!!
Hmm....
That's not what he said in court. He admitted to lying under oath. Twice.
No he didn't.
No he didn't.
He didn't?
He did not plead guilty while under oath, twice?
Matters not if for whom he pled guilty too, was corruptly working a political scheme to find dirt on Trump through indirect methods, and then to attempt to pursue Trump and his people by use of any information that was gathered by such methods.
 
The number of U.S. person identities that NSA unmasked in response to a specific request from another agency 9,217 9,529 16,721

The numbers represent calendar year 2016, 2017 and 2018.

They went up bigly since Obama.


Too funny.
We will probably still see Trump supporters declaring that unmasking is illegal...

What do they say about deficits?
 
It's easy to identify the groups who have been after Trump since he was elected, and sadly it is that they have been after him based upon lies that were used in order to try and harm his presidency because of their fear of things in which they were told Trump would destroy (if he became president). Shockingly for them though, is that he actually done an outstanding job of building a great economy for everyone, but that got in their way big time, and it presented for them yet another obstacle for them to tear down in the grand scheme of things.

These group's have been spoon-fed that no other leadership can serve them except for a demoncrat leadership, and that is unexceptable and un-American.

If American's have been brainwashed in this way, and Democrats in power are or have been behind it (the most of them), then that needs to be known completely.
 
Double jeapardy eh ?
That's not double jeopardy. That's a different crime entirely. Man, we sure do have a lot of Trump U graduate lawyers in this thread....

Do you find it odd at all that you are defending Flynn? The convicted liar? The disgraced former general who became a foreign agent for our adversaries? Don't you find that odd?
I'll defend anyone who has been railroaded in the way that this man was railroaded in the scheme of things. Trying to dis-attach the Flynn case from the entire scheme of things is something that's an eye opener for all. We all noticed how that was being attempted with the "he lied" the end bullcrap.
 

Forum List

Back
Top