JoeB131
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2011
- 172,574
- 33,253
Silliness. Condi won't be veep.
And Romney won't be president... so it all works out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Silliness. Condi won't be veep.
The only thing worse than a neo-Con is a Black neo-Con, because the sycophantic hypocrisy enshrined in that laughable designation is plainly disgusting. It is almost as bad as as Allen West at a cross-burning wearing a hood.Condi Rice is just another neocon.
[...]
Don't kid yourself. While there might be a few Progressives who take Rice as seriously as she takes herself she is for the most part known to have been one of Bush's two token negroes who were as willing to lie for their master as were Uncle Tom and Butterfly McQueen.You don't have to be a loud Mouthed Talk show host to see the Left is afraid of Condi.Its amazing how much the thought of Condi as a running mate scares the shit out of liberals.
Rush? is that you??
JoeB continues to babble about Mormonism. Nothing here, folks; move along.
Here's why Rice would be a bad pick.
1) She's not a politician. She's simply not ready for how savage that game can be.
2) She'll remind everyone about Bush. That's the last thing Romney needs.
3) She'll remind Republicans how really unimpressed they are with Romney and how the establishment bullied them into a candidate most of them really didn't want. "Oh, my God. I have a pulse!"
The fact is, the Veep hasn't been a game changer since 1960, and it won't be this time.
Romney would be better off picking Portman or Pawlenty. Dull, competent, know how to play the game, won't upstage the boss.
Didn't mention MOrmonism once here... but that's okay, guy... I know you know you foisted a loser on the GOP.
JoeB continues to babble about Mormonism. Nothing here, folks; move along.
Didn't mention MOrmonism once here... but that's okay, guy... I know you know you foisted a loser on the GOP.
Actually, going to kick Barak's ass.
the Bain stuff is decimating him, just like I said it would.
the Bain stuff is decimating him, just like I said it would.
It's looking like the question will be whether Obama's surrogates are pushing too hard. He and the GOP are playing the victims on this, which can be a legitimate point. On the other hand, the Dems are betting that "Mitt as victim" isn't going to exactly melt hearts.
.
The only thing worse than a neo-Con is a Black neo-Con, because the sycophantic hypocrisy enshrined in that laughable designation is plainly disgusting. It is almost as bad as as Allen West at a cross-burning wearing a hood.Condi Rice is just another neocon.
[...]
Politics brings out some really strange characters.
While there might be a few Progressives who take Rice as seriously as she takes herself she is for the most part known to have been one of Bush's two token negroes who were as willing to lie for their master as were Uncle Tom and Butterfly McQueen.
It is fascinating that the right frames the debate in terms of fear and death metaphors. Ms Rice is pro choice among other things and the republican base and Romney' promise preclude her from selection. This is Drudge muddying the water with his typical nonsense.
"This is going to sound sort of obvious, but here we go: A study from University College London published this week in Current Biology has discovered that there are actually differences in the brains of liberals and conservatives. Specifically, liberals' brains tend to be bigger in the area that deals with processing complex ideas and situations, while conservatives' brains are bigger in the area that processes fear." Liberal Brains Bigger in Areas of Complexity; Conservative Brains Bigger in Areas of Fear - Culture - GOOD
It is fascinating that the right frames the debate in terms of fear and death metaphors. Ms Rice is pro choice among other things and the republican base and Romney' promise preclude her from selection. This is Drudge muddying the water with his typical nonsense.
"This is going to sound sort of obvious, but here we go: A study from University College London published this week in Current Biology has discovered that there are actually differences in the brains of liberals and conservatives. Specifically, liberals' brains tend to be bigger in the area that deals with processing complex ideas and situations, while conservatives' brains are bigger in the area that processes fear." Liberal Brains Bigger in Areas of Complexity; Conservative Brains Bigger in Areas of Fear - Culture - GOOD
No wonder liberals think Castro is a genius! But, liberals also think Michael Moore is thin.
"I believe that there is no country in the world including any and all the countries under colonial domination, where economic colonization, humiliation and exploitation were worse than in Cuba, in part owing to my countrys policies during the Batista regime. I approved the proclamation which Fidel Castro made in the Sierra Maestra, when he justifiably called for justice and especially yearned to rid Cuba of corruption. I will even go further: to some extent it is as though Batista was the incarnation of a number of sins on the part of the United States. Now we shall have to pay for those sins. In the matter of the Batista regime, I am in agreement with the first Cuban revolutionaries. That is perfectly clear."
U.S. President John F. Kennedy, interview with Jean Daniel, 24 October 1963[11]
No wonder liberals think Castro is a genius!
But, liberals also think Michael Moore is thin.
No reply, yet.No wonder liberals think Castro is a genius!
Who thinks Castro is a genius? Name names.
But, liberals also think Michael Moore is thin.
Really? Who had made that assertion?