Breaking: NJ Judge Admits He Never Read Briefs That Ted Cruz Was Not A Natural Born Citizen

[Contumacious]

Why would the judge read briefs on such a matter. His clerks read them and gave him an outline of claims and arguments and remedies.

And you KNOW that how

 

[JakeStarkey]

Why would the judge read briefs on such a matter. His clerks read them and gave him an outline of claims and arguments and remedies.

And you KNOW that how

You don't how judges operate?

 

[Contumacious]

And he admits he was called out of retirement to handle the case. The fix was in!

New Jersey Ballot Challenge Report: Judge Did Not Review Briefs Submitted by Challengers | The Post & Email

As I have shown on numerous occasions the "judicial" system is corrupt to its core.

Only skylar and comrade Starkiev believe that Moscow show trials are valid

SCOTUS have adopted the nazi rule which prevents WE THE PEOPLE from suing judges - they are, somehow, immune.


.

You've shown that you can call the Supreme Court justices names. That's about it.

You have shown that as a socialist , you oppose individual freedom, the free market and Capitalism and towards that end you encourage judicial tyranny.


.

And now you're just calling me names. Is that really the extent of your argument? You have to know its legally irrelevant. As our constitution doesn't give a fiddler's fuck what names you call people.

You have taken upon yourself to come to this forum and PURPOSELY misrepresent


unless you are employed by the so-called judicial system I fail to see how as an individual you benefit from having those motherfuckers USURP powers.


.HOW do WE THE PEOPLE benefit from having the TYRANTS take it upon themselves to IMMUNIZE themselves without any Constitutional authority to do so .

Stop being a fucking brownoser and explain

 

[JakeStarkey]

And he admits he was called out of retirement to handle the case. The fix was in!

New Jersey Ballot Challenge Report: Judge Did Not Review Briefs Submitted by Challengers | The Post & Email

As I have shown on numerous occasions the "judicial" system is corrupt to its core.

Only skylar and comrade Starkiev believe that Moscow show trials are valid

SCOTUS have adopted the nazi rule which prevents WE THE PEOPLE from suing judges - they are, somehow, immune.


.

You've shown that you can call the Supreme Court justices names. That's about it.

You have shown that as a socialist , you oppose individual freedom, the free market and Capitalism and towards that end you encourage judicial tyranny.


.

And now you're just calling me names. Is that really the extent of your argument? You have to know its legally irrelevant. As our constitution doesn't give a fiddler's fuck what names you call people.

You have taken upon yourself to come to this forum and PURPOSELY misrepresent unless you are employed by the so-called judicial system I fail to see how as an individual you benefit from having those motherfuckers USURP powers. .HOW do WE THE PEOPLE benefit from having the TYRANTS take it upon themselves to IMMUNIZE themselves without any Constitutional authority to do so. Stop being a fucking brownoser and explain

You won't believe me, so I suggest you talk to some judges or people who work for them. But here's a hint: they cannot by themselves handle the incredible paperwork etc.

 

[Skylar]

Why would the judge read briefs on such a matter. His clerks read them and gave him an outline of claims and arguments and remedies.

And you KNOW that how

You don't how judges operate?

There's no filter on what can be submitted to the court as a brief. And not all of them are quality. Clerks routinely summarize briefs for judges. That's one of the reason that judges hire them.

In litigation, you have to persuade judges that your client’s position is correct, but don’t forget about the gatekeepers. Your motions and briefs will probably be reviewed by a law clerk before it reaches the judge’s desk. I have spoken with several federal law clerks, and they told me that they have reviewed many motions and briefs where it appeared that the attorneys didn’t care whether their clients prevailed.
How To Lose Your Case

In many instances, a judge will ask a clerk to write a bench memo, a summary of both sides. Its merely advice for the judge and is non-binding. But a clerk that doesn't know what their judge would find useful isn't going to be their clerk for long.

The bench memo itself does NOT decide the case; it is not a brief by counsel or a judicial opinion. Rather, the bench memo simply advises a judge by offering an objective review of both sides of the case. As opposed to a brief, which explores only one side’s arguments (with brief discussion of counterarguments), the bench memo
summarizes and develops both sides’ arguments, recognizes the merits and drawbacks of those arguments, and recommends a course of action

http://www.law.georgetown.edu/acade...he-bench-memorandum-jessica-klarfeld-2011.pdf

This is obscure stuff, not commonly known to those who aren't affiliated with law. So its understandable that you wouldn't know it. But if you're going to comment on law, you might want to acquaint yourself with how it works.

 

[Skylar]

And he admits he was called out of retirement to handle the case. The fix was in!

New Jersey Ballot Challenge Report: Judge Did Not Review Briefs Submitted by Challengers | The Post & Email

As I have shown on numerous occasions the "judicial" system is corrupt to its core.

Only skylar and comrade Starkiev believe that Moscow show trials are valid

SCOTUS have adopted the nazi rule which prevents WE THE PEOPLE from suing judges - they are, somehow, immune.


.

You've shown that you can call the Supreme Court justices names. That's about it.

You have shown that as a socialist , you oppose individual freedom, the free market and Capitalism and towards that end you encourage judicial tyranny.


.

And now you're just calling me names. Is that really the extent of your argument? You have to know its legally irrelevant. As our constitution doesn't give a fiddler's fuck what names you call people.

You have taken upon yourself to come to this forum and PURPOSELY misrepresent


unless you are employed by the so-called judicial system I fail to see how as an individual you benefit from having those motherfuckers USURP powers.


.HOW do WE THE PEOPLE benefit from having the TYRANTS take it upon themselves to IMMUNIZE themselves without any Constitutional authority to do so .

Stop being a fucking brownoser and explain

Usurp....according to who? Remember, per the Federalist Papers, the role of the judiciary is to interpret the law and the constitution. And to enact the constitution in exclusion of statutes that are in conflict with it.

The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.

How are they 'usurping' power by doing *exactly* what the founders intended for them to do? And how have I misrepresented the role of the judiciary as described in the Federalist Papers?

And by all means, be specific.

 

[Syriusly]

And he admits he was called out of retirement to handle the case. The fix was in!

New Jersey Ballot Challenge Report: Judge Did Not Review Briefs Submitted by Challengers | The Post & Email

As I have shown on numerous occasions the "judicial" system is corrupt to its core.

Only skylar and comrade Starkiev believe that Moscow show trials are valid

SCOTUS have adopted the nazi rule which prevents WE THE PEOPLE from suing judges - they are, somehow, immune.


.

And by the 'Nazi' rule Cont means "The U.S. Constitution".......

You miserable ignorant piece of shit


.

LOL......you Right Wing Nut Jobs with the vocabulary of a Third grader at recess hoping the teachers are not listening.

 

[Syriusly]

As I have shown on numerous occasions the "judicial" system is corrupt to its core.

Only skylar and comrade Starkiev believe that Moscow show trials are valid

SCOTUS have adopted the nazi rule which prevents WE THE PEOPLE from suing judges - they are, somehow, immune.


.

You've shown that you can call the Supreme Court justices names. That's about it.

You have shown that as a socialist , you oppose individual freedom, the free market and Capitalism and towards that end you encourage judicial tyranny.


.

And now you're just calling me names. Is that really the extent of your argument? You have to know its legally irrelevant. As our constitution doesn't give a fiddler's fuck what names you call people.

You have taken upon yourself to come to this forum and PURPOSELY misrepresent


unless you are employed by the so-called judicial system I fail to see how as an individual you benefit from having those motherfuckers USURP powers.


.HOW do WE THE PEOPLE benefit from having the TYRANTS take it upon themselves to IMMUNIZE themselves without any Constitutional authority to do so .

Stop being a fucking brownoser and explain

Usurp....according to who? Remember, per the Federalist Papers, the role of the judiciary is to interpret the law and the constitution. And to enact the constitution in exclusion of statutes that are in conflict with it.

The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.

How are they 'usurping' power by doing *exactly* what the founders intended for them to do? And how have I misrepresented the role of the judiciary as described in the Federalist Papers?

And by all means, be specific.

Watch out- he might call you names!

 

[Skylar]

You've shown that you can call the Supreme Court justices names. That's about it.

You have shown that as a socialist , you oppose individual freedom, the free market and Capitalism and towards that end you encourage judicial tyranny.


.

And now you're just calling me names. Is that really the extent of your argument? You have to know its legally irrelevant. As our constitution doesn't give a fiddler's fuck what names you call people.

You have taken upon yourself to come to this forum and PURPOSELY misrepresent


unless you are employed by the so-called judicial system I fail to see how as an individual you benefit from having those motherfuckers USURP powers.


.HOW do WE THE PEOPLE benefit from having the TYRANTS take it upon themselves to IMMUNIZE themselves without any Constitutional authority to do so .

Stop being a fucking brownoser and explain

Usurp....according to who? Remember, per the Federalist Papers, the role of the judiciary is to interpret the law and the constitution. And to enact the constitution in exclusion of statutes that are in conflict with it.

The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.

How are they 'usurping' power by doing *exactly* what the founders intended for them to do? And how have I misrepresented the role of the judiciary as described in the Federalist Papers?

And by all means, be specific.

Watch out- he might call you names!

So far his argument has been the equivalent of listening to a toddler learning to curse.

I'm genuinely surprised he can't call me a 'ca-ca doodie head'.

 

[Liquid Reigns]

Cruz acquired his citizenship at birth- regardless of when the United States officially recognized his birth.

A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met.

Note- the 'at birth'. Note also the word 'should'
The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad

That is not a statutory requirement.

What were the statutory requirements?
Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock
A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

Cruz automatically became a citizen because he entered the US prior to age 18 and lived with his US Citizen mother.
8 U.S. Code § 1431 - Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired; determinations of name and birth date
8 U.S. Code § 1433 - Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship

 

[JakeStarkey]

Cruz acquired his citizenship at birth- regardless of when the United States officially recognized his birth.

A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met.

Note- the 'at birth'. Note also the word 'should'
The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad

That is not a statutory requirement.

What were the statutory requirements?
Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock
A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

Had Cruz not entered the US prior to age 18, his US citizenship would have been acquired.
8 U.S. Code § 1431 - Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired; determinations of name and birth date
8 U.S. Code § 1433 - Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship

You have no idea what you posted, do you?

 

[Liquid Reigns]

Cruz acquired his citizenship at birth- regardless of when the United States officially recognized his birth.

A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met.

Note- the 'at birth'. Note also the word 'should'
The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad

That is not a statutory requirement.

What were the statutory requirements?
Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock
A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

Had Cruz not entered the US prior to age 18, his US citizenship would have been acquired.
8 U.S. Code § 1431 - Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired; determinations of name and birth date
8 U.S. Code § 1433 - Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship

You have no idea what you posted, do you?

:yawn: You have no idea of laws, do you? :yawn:

 

[whitehall]

" Have had the briefs from both sides for four or five days and I haven't read them"? The freaking world is falling apart and people waste time feigning outrage that a judge hasn't read a freaking brief in a week? Sometimes it takes judges months to decide a legal point. Since Cruz doesn't dispute the allegations it seems moot anyway.

 

[Syriusly]

Cruz acquired his citizenship at birth- regardless of when the United States officially recognized his birth.

A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met.

Note- the 'at birth'. Note also the word 'should'
The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad

That is not a statutory requirement.

What were the statutory requirements?
Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock
A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

Cruz automatically became a citizen because he entered the US prior to age 18 and lived with his US Citizen mother.
8 U.S. Code § 1431 - Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired; determinations of name and birth date
8 U.S. Code § 1433 - Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship

child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was p

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Cruz acquired his citizenship at birth- regardless of when the United States officially recognized his birth.

A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met.

Note- the 'at birth'. Note also the word 'should'
The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad

That is not a statutory requirement.

What were the statutory requirements?
Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock
A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

Cruz automatically became a citizen because he entered the US prior to age 18 and lived with his US Citizen mother.
8 U.S. Code § 1431 - Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired; determinations of name and birth date
8 U.S. Code § 1433 - Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship

child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was p

Thus proving he was naturalized via statute. A statutory Citizen (Bestowed by man's pen/Positive law) can never be made into a natural born citizen (Bestowed by God/ Natural law).

 

[Syriusly]

Cruz acquired his citizenship at birth- regardless of when the United States officially recognized his birth.

A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met.

Note- the 'at birth'. Note also the word 'should'
The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad

That is not a statutory requirement.

What were the statutory requirements?
Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock
A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

Cruz automatically became a citizen because he entered the US prior to age 18 and lived with his US Citizen mother.
8 U.S. Code § 1431 - Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired; determinations of name and birth date
8 U.S. Code § 1433 - Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship

child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was p

Thus proving he was naturalized via statute. A statutory Citizen (Bestowed by man's pen/Positive law) can never be made into a natural born citizen (Bestowed by God/ Natural law).

There is no such thing as a statutory citizen- there are only natural born and naturalized.

And Cruz was never naturalized.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Cruz acquired his citizenship at birth- regardless of when the United States officially recognized his birth.

A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met.

Note- the 'at birth'. Note also the word 'should'
The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad

That is not a statutory requirement.

What were the statutory requirements?
Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock
A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

Had Cruz not entered the US prior to age 18, his US citizenship would have been acquired.
8 U.S. Code § 1431 - Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired; determinations of name and birth date
8 U.S. Code § 1433 - Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship

You have no idea what you posted, do you?

:yawn: You have no idea of laws, do you? :yawn:

I accept your concession of defeat.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Cruz acquired his citizenship at birth- regardless of when the United States officially recognized his birth.

A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met.

Note- the 'at birth'. Note also the word 'should'
The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad

That is not a statutory requirement.

What were the statutory requirements?
Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock
A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

Cruz automatically became a citizen because he entered the US prior to age 18 and lived with his US Citizen mother.
8 U.S. Code § 1431 - Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired; determinations of name and birth date
8 U.S. Code § 1433 - Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship

child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was p

Thus proving he was naturalized via statute. A statutory Citizen (Bestowed by man's pen/Positive law) can never be made into a natural born citizen (Bestowed by God/ Natural law).

He is a natural born citizen solely by being the son of an American citizen. There is no such thing as "naturalized by Positive law" as you suggest. However, show us some solid case law that supports your position.

 

[Syriusly]

Cruz acquired his citizenship at birth- regardless of when the United States officially recognized his birth.

A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met.

Note- the 'at birth'. Note also the word 'should'
The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad

That is not a statutory requirement.

What were the statutory requirements?
Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock
A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

Cruz automatically became a citizen because he entered the US prior to age 18 and lived with his US Citizen mother.
8 U.S. Code § 1431 - Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired; determinations of name and birth date
8 U.S. Code § 1433 - Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship

child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was p

Thus proving he was naturalized via statute. A statutory Citizen (Bestowed by man's pen/Positive law) can never be made into a natural born citizen (Bestowed by God/ Natural law).

He is a natural born citizen solely by being the son of an American citizen. There is no such thing as "naturalized by Positive law" as you suggest. However, show us some solid case law that supports your position.

The reality is that Ted Cruz is presumed eligible unless and until an actual authority says otherwise- so far not a single Secretary of State or judge has said that he is not eligible- on the contrary the judge in this case reviewed Cruz's status and ruled that he is indeed eligible.

 

[g5000]

The judge should use the brief for toilet paper.