Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only requirement needed for cops to murder is that they say they believed something bad was going to happen.
That's the get out of jail card right there...belief. They should put them on a lie detector everytime they use that tired excuse
The only requirement needed for cops to murder is that they say they believed something bad was going to happen.
That's the get out of jail card right there...belief. They should put them on a lie detector everytime they use that tired excuse
They do. Lie detectors aren't admissible to criminal court. But are admissible to internal affairs investigations...and PDS use them.
You need about a year in basic law 101. You're too dumb for this topic.
The only requirement needed for cops to murder is that they say they believed something bad was going to happen.
That's the get out of jail card right there...belief. They should put them on a lie detector everytime they use that tired excuse
They do. Lie detectors aren't admissible to criminal court. But are admissible to internal affairs investigations...and PDS use them.
You need about a year in basic law 101. You're too dumb for this topic.
Aww, you say that to all the people who dont lick boots
Now maybe you'll start a thread asking USMB if CC is stupid and seek approval that way
Now maybe you'll start a thread asking USMB if CC is stupid and seek approval that way
No. But MORE slow drip evidence of why Slager is going free? Sure.
WCSC : Michael Slager: 'I'm afraid now, is he going to take my weapon and shoot me?'
So we may have another cop getting away with cold blooded murder. Isn't that always the case?
I so wish the defense would call Bucs90 as an expert witness.
The defendent would be convicted, all appeals denied, and in general population in time for dinner the same day.
So we may have another cop getting away with cold blooded murder. Isn't that always the case?
No, they don't. There is no blanket of immunity for every shooting. You know that. The world watched a cop unload eight rounds into the back of a man.I so wish the defense would call Bucs90 as an expert witness.
The defendent would be convicted, all appeals denied, and in general population in time for dinner the same day.
They'll have witnesses far smarter than me...who also agree with me. So does the Supreme Court.
No, they don't. There is no blanket of immunity for every shooting. You know that. The world watched a cop unload eight rounds into the back of a man.I so wish the defense would call Bucs90 as an expert witness.
The defendent would be convicted, all appeals denied, and in general population in time for dinner the same day.
They'll have witnesses far smarter than me...who also agree with me. So does the Supreme Court.
So we may have another cop getting away with cold blooded murder. Isn't that always the case?
Wow. So any time a cop has to use deadly force, he's committing "cold blooded murder?" What? Should we just ignore due process and jump right to the conviction?
Geez, armchair jurists like you are why we are in this mess to begin with, pronouncing guilt before the facts have come out.
That is not what SCOTUS says. You think it means that the cop is judge, jury, and executioner. You know you are wrong, and you do not have the fortitude, the manhood, the LEO integrity to admit it.No, they don't. There is no blanket of immunity for every shooting. You know that. The world watched a cop unload eight rounds into the back of a man.I so wish the defense would call Bucs90 as an expert witness.
The defendent would be convicted, all appeals denied, and in general population in time for dinner the same day.
They'll have witnesses far smarter than me...who also agree with me. So does the Supreme Court.
That's true. SCOTUS laid out situations and circumstances which allow cops to use deadly force....in scenarios which wouldn't allow you or I to do it...because cops are granted more leeway due to having the lawful authority to detain a criminal.
Cops arent held by the same self defense standard you and I are. SCOTUS ruled.
That is not what SCOTUS says. You think it means that the cop is judge, jury, and executioner. You know you are wrong, and you do not have the fortitude, the manhood, the LEO integrity to admit it.No, they don't. There is no blanket of immunity for every shooting. You know that. The world watched a cop unload eight rounds into the back of a man.I so wish the defense would call Bucs90 as an expert witness.
The defendent would be convicted, all appeals denied, and in general population in time for dinner the same day.
They'll have witnesses far smarter than me...who also agree with me. So does the Supreme Court.
That's true. SCOTUS laid out situations and circumstances which allow cops to use deadly force....in scenarios which wouldn't allow you or I to do it...because cops are granted more leeway due to having the lawful authority to detain a criminal.
Cops arent held by the same self defense standard you and I are. SCOTUS ruled.
When Slager is convicted, it will be appealed using those cases as examples. And when each appellate judge or judges look at the tape, the answer will always be "nope."
I know the argument, Bucs90.
The fact is that case law is a guide not a requirement.
Slager was not operating under a blanket of immunity, and the film clearly shows his adoption of judge, jury, and executioner.
He will be convicted, he will appeal, it will be denied or he will die in jail before it is denied.
