BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials

[Hutch Starskey]

When you see a thread blow up like this in a couple of hours, you know one thing for certain: one side is losing badly!!

Oh, we all get that. Bigly.

 

[bodecea]

Rice didn't break any laws and it is part of her job. You republican snowflakes won the election and you're still whining about Obama. How about worry about issues that actually effect the average American.

They cannot help but hide behind the Former President's coattails.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No, dope.
The fact that the Russians were behind the hacks and release is not in dispute. It's the basis of the counter intelligence investigation that includes Trump.

Oh it is completely in dispute. Not one government intel agency has examined the servers. That's the bottom line here. The two IT companies worked for the DNC and US Department of Defense.

Outside companies. With yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge D connections.

Not one government intel agency has examined the servers.

Who said they needed to in order to reach the determination that Russia was behind the hack and release?

Are they all lying or just incompetent?

I'm not going to beleive a DNC employee for one freaking minute.

Do you believe the FBI?

The FBI exonerated Flynn with The Transcripts of Surveillance You Devil Worshippers Said Never Happened, so in that one instance, yes.

But ask if I believe Comey? Hell No. He Perjured himself. He also let the following Obama Ass Sniffers get away with Perjury and other Felonies.

Holder
Lerner
Lynch
Kosiken
Clapper
Rice

So........conspiracy.
Deep state conspiracy to effect a coup against Trump.
Got it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Rice has followed the letter of the law, and it is only a matter of time before Trumpers go to trial.

There is no way you really believe that.

Unlike you sillies, I believe in facts not opinions and not fake news. She followed the law. The Trumpers apparently did not. The investigations will prove that out or not. I think (my opinion) that the Trumpers are in serious worry time.

Jake, what laws did Trump break during the period that Obama was spying on him?

I am not concerned about Trump right now, podjo. Once the Trumpers turn tail, much like Flynn, are start testifying, then you can start worrying about Trump.

D'oh!!!! Susan Rice is in real trouble Jake. Time to reorder the Red Bull, I don't see you stepping away from the keyboards until her sentencing.

FLASHBACK: Susan Rice Said in March ‘I Know Nothing’ About Unmasking of Trump Officials

"I know nothing about this," Rice responded at the time. "I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today."

"So, today, I really don't know to what Chairman Nunes was referring, but he said that whatever he was referring to was a legal, lawful surveillance, and that it was potentially incidental collection on American citizens," added Rice, who went on to criticize Trump for his accusation that Obama wiretapped him during the presidential campaign."

 

[JimBowie1958]

I really hope that Cruz and other candidates start demanding an investigation into Obama's use of intel on political opponents. At this point in time it would not surprise me whatsoever that other R candidates were spied on.

This is the biggest political scandal in US history.

IT is the biggest scandal in the abstract potential sense of the word, yes.

But if it gets no traction in the media, it will be a nonissue to most people.

Word has to get out that this crap went on under Obama.

 

[Nia88]

[

She was a national security advisor. This was part of her job.

Spying on candidates for the opposition party? Sounds like election fixing, Not An American. If this is confirmed, I would want to see Rice prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

You fascists are Not Our Americans, and really fucked up with your witch hunt. Looks like it's you who got caught.

Members of a transition team were investigated. People who are coming into the white house need to be investigated. Bush's security advisor most likely did the same with members of Obama's transition team.

 

[mudwhistle]

You just made the case that the Russians influenced our election, dope

You have no substance to that accusation.

DEBATES influence elections.

Who CHEATED?

CNN and the DEMS


Are you concerned that CNN cheated and gave Hillary the debate questions before the debate?

HECK NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.

We know the Russians were behind it.
Thanks for explaining how it was effective.

Prove it. Let the FBI or any other government agency not getting paid by Democrats examine the servers.

What?

They've already made that determination. Their official finding is that Russia was behind the hack and the release. It's a done deal. Where did this imaginary standard of the server come from?

First of all, What Fucking Hack????

Releasing information on a Russian hack would be espionage and a felony.

 

[bodecea]

Does she realize she has committed a felony and is now risking jail time?

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One."...

The National Security Council's senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, was conducting the review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. In February Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice's multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.

The intelligence reports were summaries of monitored conversations -- primarily between foreign officials discussing the Trump transition, but also in some cases direct contact between members of the Trump team and monitored foreign officials. One U.S. official familiar with the reports said they contained valuable political information on the Trump transition such as whom the Trump team was meeting, the views of Trump associates on foreign policy matters and plans for the incoming administration.​

What felony?

 

[Thinker101]

Wow, why is this no huge surprise?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Members of a transition team were investigated. People who are coming into the white house need to be investigated. Bush's security advisor most likely did the same with members of Obama's transition team.

That is where you are completely wrong, if that matters to you.

In the USA we have normal means for doing background check investigations.

Pulling and unmasking their conversations with foreign diplomats is not one of those legal methods and is in fact a felony.

 

[jc456]

The fact that the Russians were behind the hacks and release is not in dispute.

Yes it is.

Your side hasn't proven anything except it can PARROT the same traitors in the "US intelligence" circle who endorsed Hillary before the election.

Those are the same "US intelligence" officials who lied us into Iraq, and the ones who told us a 757 hit the Pentagon. Their credibility is butt fucking ZERO.

Yes it is.

It's not.

The FBI, all of the Intel agencies and both oversight committees are all part of an investigation based on Russian interference.
It's very real and Trump is waist deep in it.

no, no it is not. sorry charlie.

It's reality, fool.

what's a reality fool?

 

[jc456]

It was illegal because she gave the info to somebody who released it the press simply to embarass Trump.

Q&A on 'unmasking' and leaking classified information

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN UNMASKING AND LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION?

One is legal and the other isn't.

The "unmasking" of Flynn's name is routine, Wittes said. But, he said, sharing Flynn's name publicly "is both shocking and inappropriate."

It is a crime to disclose or "leak" classified information. The contents of intelligence collected under the authorities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, are classified. Flynn's conversation with Kislyak was collected under these authorities and therefore classified.

IS IT ILLEGAL TO LEAK CLASSIFIED INFORMATION THAT IS INACCURATE?

No.

"If it's not accurate, then it's not classified," Wittes said. "You can't classify stuff that isn't true."

The Trump administration has said reports that Trump associates were in touch with the Kremlin during the campaign are false. Yet the White House has called for leak investigations into the matter.

"You can't say both — that it is a crime to leak and that it is false," Wittes said.

CAN THE PRESIDENT LEAK CLASSIFIED INFORMATION?

No, says Wittes.

"The president can declassify anything he wants," Wittes said. "The mere act of the president saying something is a 'declassification.'"​

​

It was illegal because she gave the info to somebody who released it the press simply to embarass Trump

Who says?

the facts.

Post them up.

I just posted it. Foreign Intelligence ACT

That Rice did it , idiot.

she admitted it. and the reason it is a felony is based on the Foreign Intelligence Act, fool.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

There is no way you really believe that.

Unlike you sillies, I believe in facts not opinions and not fake news. She followed the law. The Trumpers apparently did not. The investigations will prove that out or not. I think (my opinion) that the Trumpers are in serious worry time.

Jake, what laws did Trump break during the period that Obama was spying on him?

I am not concerned about Trump right now, podjo. Once the Trumpers turn tail, much like Flynn, are start testifying, then you can start worrying about Trump.

D'oh!!!! Susan Rice is in real trouble Jake. Time to reorder the Red Bull, I don't see you stepping away from the keyboards until her sentencing.

FLASHBACK: Susan Rice Said in March ‘I Know Nothing’ About Unmasking of Trump Officials

"I know nothing about this," Rice responded at the time. "I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today."

"So, today, I really don't know to what Chairman Nunes was referring, but he said that whatever he was referring to was a legal, lawful surveillance, and that it was potentially incidental collection on American citizens," added Rice, who went on to criticize Trump for his accusation that Obama wiretapped him during the presidential campaign."

"I know nothing about this." - Lie

"I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today." -- Yes, more like shocked and knew she was going to get busted

"So, today, I really don't know to what Chairman Nunes was referring, but he said that whatever he was referring to was a legal, lawful surveillance, and that it was potentially incidental collection on American citizens," -- Translation, I hope my go bag is packed because I might have to bug out on short notice

 

[JakeStarkey]

Translation: Nunes said it was legal.

 

[jc456]

why? one has to have a crime. So what was the crime? I've been waiting patiently. why can't we hear about the crime for the investigation? how is that classified?

No, it has to have foreign intelligence value.
Certainly it would be pertinent in a counter intelligence investigation that includes Trump and his people.

no, one has to have a crime to issue a warrant. PERIOD. try again.

no, one has to have a crime to issue a warrant. PERIOD. try again.

What warrant?

exactly! what warrant? without one, names stay masked. PERIOD!!!!!

You have no idea what you're even trying to say.

i am in perfect control of my faculties bubba. you, not so much. you don't even know you need a warrant to get info on a citizen on a wiretap. you are fking clueless.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You just made the case that the Russians influenced our election, dope

You have no substance to that accusation.

DEBATES influence elections.

Who CHEATED?

CNN and the DEMS


Are you concerned that CNN cheated and gave Hillary the debate questions before the debate?

HECK NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.

We know the Russians were behind it.
Thanks for explaining how it was effective.

Prove it. Let the FBI or any other government agency not getting paid by Democrats examine the servers.

What?

They've already made that determination. Their official finding is that Russia was behind the hack and the release. It's a done deal. Where did this imaginary standard of the server come from?

First of all, What Fucking Hack????

Releasing information on a Russian hack would be espionage and a felony.

You do understand that you're trying to argue against reality, don't you?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Translation: Nunes said it was legal.

Jake, tell them you want to go out for a breath of fresh air, then make your get away

 

[bendog]

You have no substance to that accusation.

DEBATES influence elections.

Who CHEATED?

CNN and the DEMS


Are you concerned that CNN cheated and gave Hillary the debate questions before the debate?

HECK NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.

We know the Russians were behind it.
Thanks for explaining how it was effective.

Prove it. Let the FBI or any other government agency not getting paid by Democrats examine the servers.

What?

They've already made that determination. Their official finding is that Russia was behind the hack and the release. It's a done deal. Where did this imaginary standard of the server come from?

First of all, What Fucking Hack????

Releasing information on a Russian hack would be espionage and a felony.

You do understand that you're trying to argue against reality, don't you?

No he doesn't but he has an alternative view of reality.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No, it has to have foreign intelligence value.
Certainly it would be pertinent in a counter intelligence investigation that includes Trump and his people.

no, one has to have a crime to issue a warrant. PERIOD. try again.

no, one has to have a crime to issue a warrant. PERIOD. try again.

What warrant?

exactly! what warrant? without one, names stay masked. PERIOD!!!!!

You have no idea what you're even trying to say.

i am in perfect control of my faculties bubba. you, not so much. you don't even know you need a warrant to get info on a citizen on a wiretap. you are fking clueless.

You still don't know what you're saying or how it possibly relates to this thread.

Are you telling me that Rice would need a warrant to unmask those names?

 

[bendog]

None of them have any sort of comprehensive understanding of this. They are all over the place. It's pretty funny.

Leaking the unmasked names could only be illegal one of two says.

1. It was classified information. It wasn't. At least no one has said it was. And why should it. The Ruskies already know we "tap their US phones."

2. The information was illegally collected, and Rice knew that. Not even Nunes and the gop contends the Trump guys were illegally "surveilled."

And none of the people are just ordinary people in the wrong place at the wrong time. They were all partisan political activists working in a campaign and with direct access to Trump.

Also, Obama did not order any surveillance. These were incidental captures. That means these were existing Intel reports that Rice unmasked the names on.
How these idiots get that Obama spied from that is beyond me.

You're using facts and logic - which are irrelevant to NaziCon anarchists and conspiracy theorists.

It's hard to believe that some of these guys are even competent enough to earn a living.
Most of them can barely read.

I can read the writing on The Wall Good Enough.

And The Message Is Addressed To The Democrat Party

"Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin"

Thanks for playing bullshit