Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thank you,....for the links.Exactly how many times can you Lefty Morons pretend to Ignore Facts and carry on a Charade That You Know Is False?when did the FBI exonerate him?And they do exist.the ONLY thing leaked so far is General Flynn's lie about not speaking with the Russian Ambassador about the sanctions the day the Obama administration issued new additional sanctions on Russia for their influence interference in our election process....
there have been no other leaks of any Trump campaigners that were classified....nothing from what Rice needed unmasked has been leaked, nothing from any conversation content or the actual transcripts of even Flynn's convos....just that they exist, on Flynn....
That is how THE FBI exonerated him.
With Transcripts of His Surveillance.
Isn't that cool?
I think it is.
Flynn not only lied to Pence about the convo, he lied to the FBI about it several times and FINALLY the FBI showed their hand by saying to Flynn, ARE YOU CERTAIN YOU WANT TO STICK BY WHAT YOU ARE TELLING US?
And Flynn took their cue that THEY KNEW HE TALKED WITH HIM and amended his testimony with the FBI leaving it as a 'possibility' that he may have talked with the Ambassador about the sanctions.'
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Intelligence Official: Transcripts Of Flynn's Calls Don't Show Criminal Wrongdoing
NPR intel source: No evidence of wrongdoing in Flynn-Kislyak transcripts - Hot Air
FBI Again Says: Nothing Illicit In Flynn Case… | Weasel Zippers
Why Michael Flynn likely won't face charges under the Logan Act - CNNPolitics.com
FBI found no wrongdoing in Flynn’s calls with Russia: report
Freedom's Lighthouse » Report: FBI Finds “No evidence of wrongdoing or illicit ties” in Flynn Phone Calls with Russia – 1/24/17
I feel like I am teaching the 3rd grade repeating myself over, and over and over again, because the kids I teach are a bunch of phucking imbeciles!
yes, it's always the ''coverup'' that nails them!
Flynn should not have lied about the phone calls...as if he was ''covering'' something up he wanted to hide! And Flynn should not have lied to the VP, or to us....WHY he did this, is still unexplained.
Thank you Boomberg! We now know it was done legally and for a REASON:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
And we now know it had NOTHING to do with Trump's lying tweets.
Rice's requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials does not vindicate Trump's own tweets from March 4 in which he accused Obama of illegally tapping Trump Tower. There remains no evidence to support that claim.
He is busy writing his memoirs titled: " America, the Evil Whitey Empire and How I Tried to Destroy Her."Where is your evidence that Former President Obama is afraid to return to the borders of America?What is funny is seeing that Obama is afraid to return to the borders of America. He knows he only has lies for answers.What is funny is that you think any believe you know what you are talking about
As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.
But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.
None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.
If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.
Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.
So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.
I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.
Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.
That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges
Who has said that either Rice or Obama released anything?
How do we know who's been unmasked?
And most likely, Obama gave her the authority to do it! The shit has hit the fan!
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/report-obama-nsa-advisor-susan-rice-requested-unmasking-incoming-trump-officials/
Flynn was totally wrong to lie about that. Had he not done that, he is still with The Administration. The Administration did The Right Thing is asking him to resign, because as things are, The Media and The Opposition would have made a mountain out of a molehill. But as it turns out, they would have done it any way even if they know Flynn committed no crimes, and just had a lapse of judgment. Either way, The Admin was going to have to part ways with him.thank you,....for the links.Exactly how many times can you Lefty Morons pretend to Ignore Facts and carry on a Charade That You Know Is False?when did the FBI exonerate him?And they do exist.the ONLY thing leaked so far is General Flynn's lie about not speaking with the Russian Ambassador about the sanctions the day the Obama administration issued new additional sanctions on Russia for their influence interference in our election process....
there have been no other leaks of any Trump campaigners that were classified....nothing from what Rice needed unmasked has been leaked, nothing from any conversation content or the actual transcripts of even Flynn's convos....just that they exist, on Flynn....
That is how THE FBI exonerated him.
With Transcripts of His Surveillance.
Isn't that cool?
I think it is.
Flynn not only lied to Pence about the convo, he lied to the FBI about it several times and FINALLY the FBI showed their hand by saying to Flynn, ARE YOU CERTAIN YOU WANT TO STICK BY WHAT YOU ARE TELLING US?
And Flynn took their cue that THEY KNEW HE TALKED WITH HIM and amended his testimony with the FBI leaving it as a 'possibility' that he may have talked with the Ambassador about the sanctions.'
FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Intelligence Official: Transcripts Of Flynn's Calls Don't Show Criminal Wrongdoing
NPR intel source: No evidence of wrongdoing in Flynn-Kislyak transcripts - Hot Air
FBI Again Says: Nothing Illicit In Flynn Case… | Weasel Zippers
Why Michael Flynn likely won't face charges under the Logan Act - CNNPolitics.com
FBI found no wrongdoing in Flynn’s calls with Russia: report
Freedom's Lighthouse » Report: FBI Finds “No evidence of wrongdoing or illicit ties” in Flynn Phone Calls with Russia – 1/24/17
I feel like I am teaching the 3rd grade repeating myself over, and over and over again, because the kids I teach are a bunch of phucking imbeciles!
yes, it's always the ''coverup'' that nails them!
Flynn should not have lied about the phone calls...as if he was ''covering'' something up he wanted to hide! And Flynn should not have lied to the VP, or to us....WHY he did this, is still unexplained.
As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.
But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.
None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.
If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.
Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.
So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.
I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.
Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.
That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges
Who has said that either Rice or Obama released anything?
How do we know who's been unmasked?
Rice could NOT UNMASK THEM, she can only request that they are unmasked from the head of the Intel Agency that collected the surveillance of information in the first place, and on that request, by law, you have to give the Agency head reasons why the unmasking is critical or pertinent to understanding the foreign intelligence collected....As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.
But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.
None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.
If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.
Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.
So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.
I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.
Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.
That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges
Rice could NOT UNMASK THEM, she can only request that they are unmasked from the head of the Intel Agency that collected the surveillance of information in the first place, and on that request, by law, you have to give the Agency head reasons why the unmasking is critical or pertinent to understanding the foreign intelligence collected....As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.
But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.
None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.
If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.
Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.
So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.
I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.
Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.
That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges
I repeat, Rice does not make that decision, Rice can not unmask them on her own..
In mid October when the public was told about the Russian Interference again with 17 Intelligence agencies stating so, Obama announced that he asked for a comprehensive investigation tying all the information together from their investigations such far and continuing. A week before President Trump's inauguration he and Obama were briefed by the intelligence community on what they found, the classified version, and we were informed of the unclassified version of their analysis.
The election was only2 to 3 weeks after Obama asked for this one consolidated investigative report ...and it would make sense that the investigation with all hands on deck, were heavily involved in trying to have this analysis done before Obama left office...And from beginning near the election period end thru right before his departure.
something!yeppers!!! way to go.. Now you got it.You still don't know what you're saying or how it possibly relates to this thread.
Are you telling me that Rice would need a warrant to unmask those names?
I don't believe that's correct. Post up something.
Nothing.
Whomever said you need a warrant to unmask incidental targets of Surveillance was wrong.
You Need Authorization.
That could be in the form of a Subpoena. Or it could be done by A Lawful and Public Order to do the unmasking by An Intelligence Official who has that Authority, but to do that, he or she has to Cite a Criminal Violation, and also has to have The Classified Information Declassified and have this approved by a Civilian Authority who has oversight over his or her Department, and has to cite why.
There are hurdles and checks and balances in place that you have to overcome to Unmask an Incidental Target of Surveillance, and NO ONE ACCOMPLISHED THAT!
In other words The Unmasking was Illegal because there was No Legal Authorization Ordering any Unmasking to take place. Therefore a Felony was Committed.
It does not matter if you argue over whether or not The Surveillance was Legal or Not. There was no Authorization to Unmask which means The Intelligence was still Classified, and was not Legally Declassified.
This then becomes a Felony Espionage Case and is a violation of The Espionage Act which subjects The Leaker to Sedition, and Treason Charges as well.
For the sake of Brevity, let me put it in these words.
"Your Goose Is Cooked!"
There are hurdles and checks and balances in place that you have to overcome to Unmask an Incidental Target of Surveillance, and NO ONE ACCOMPLISHED THAT!
As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.
But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and failure to have an order to declassify the documents is a Felony. Actually 2 felonies right there if you are counting.
None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.
If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it.
If this was authorized we would know exactly where the order came from.
if this was authorized we would know exactly who signed it.
It would all be PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE.
Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and without the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies!
So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.
I am thinking there were enough felonies committed here to put anyone who did it away for life.
NO, NOT TRUEAs reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
So they were spying on the Trump team thinking they could justify it with a technicality.
Well where is he? Why is he so quiet while he and his NSA Susan Rice gets exposed? Wouldn't he want to clear this whole thing up if there was nothing to hide? The evidence so far is on my side. The guy is in hiding. He is staying as far from a microphone as he can get so he doesn't perjure himself.Where is your evidence that Former President Obama is afraid to return to the borders of America?
The Obama administration might go down as being one of the most corrupt in history. It makes sense to, because Obama's threat to fundementally transform this nation is the smoking gun in which can beAnd ... ???Does she realize she has committed a felony and is now risking jail time?
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One."...
The National Security Council's senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, was conducting the review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. In February Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice's multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.
The intelligence reports were summaries of monitored conversations -- primarily between foreign officials discussing the Trump transition, but also in some cases direct contact between members of the Trump team and monitored foreign officials. One U.S. official familiar with the reports said they contained valuable political information on the Trump transition such as whom the Trump team was meeting, the views of Trump associates on foreign policy matters and plans for the incoming administration.
Was she bugging Trump Towers ???
And did BHO tell her to ???
Interpreted to me now as being to somehow defeat white power or minimize it somehow, and to control it into the very distant future. Also to defeat white power by transferring as much as humanly possible all future white wealth to boot, and to do this with all "Obama's" wealth transfer schemes as were concocted through the use of regulations, climate change, Obama care, and you name it. And to add a new one now "SURVIELENCE" !!!!!!!!!!
According to Devon Nunes, the unmaskings had nothing to do with Russia.NO, NOT TRUEAs reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
So they were spying on the Trump team thinking they could justify it with a technicality.
they were investigating/spying on foreign spies/agents/operatives....
Trump's team's involvement with them can only be unmasked if their identities are important and pertinent to the surveillance investigation.
IF there are Trump people that are unmasked for key people, it is because somehow they are INVOLVED in the foreign investigation.
talked with the president about it.... unmasking can be selective, not for EVERYONE. she was the NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR for the President.Care, Rice woukd have to request names to be un-masked. Or they would be USA1, USA6 etc.
Once she got names, what did she do with it?
