BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials

[The Original Tree]

You know you cannot "unmask" a protected citizen caught in "incidental" surveillance unless you get authorization in writing, right?

And that unmasking and the authorization and who signed it has to accompany each other, and is only unmasked to The Intelligence Community.

Now, to take Classified Information, and commit "Unmasking" not only do you need "The Authorization" in writing, you also have to have in writing an ORDER Declassifying it, at which point The Intelligence Agency holding the Classified Information then downgrades the Classified Information and opens it up to Public Access, and also stamps all the associated documents with the proper classification ratings.

UMMM

NONE
OF
THAT
OCCURRED

A Felony Was Committed.

Did Obama or Congress, or The Congressional Intelligence Committee, or Gang of 8 ORDER the Unmasking?

NOPE.

Because if anyone ordered it, we would see the order, and who signed it, and where the order came from and this would accompany the "Intelligence".

Every time you unmask someone without Authorization, you Commit Two Felonies.
If you share it with The Public, you have Committed a 3rd Felony for each act of Unmasking.

And that my friends is Felony Espionage.

Thanks for playing.

You win an Orange Jump Suit!

 

[Bush92]

Does she realize she has committed a felony and is now risking jail time?

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One."...

The National Security Council's senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, was conducting the review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. In February Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice's multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.

The intelligence reports were summaries of monitored conversations -- primarily between foreign officials discussing the Trump transition, but also in some cases direct contact between members of the Trump team and monitored foreign officials. One U.S. official familiar with the reports said they contained valuable political information on the Trump transition such as whom the Trump team was meeting, the views of Trump associates on foreign policy matters and plans for the incoming administration.​

Going to be a bad week for Democrats.

 

[Bush92]

Does she realize she has committed a felony and is now risking jail time?

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One."...

The National Security Council's senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, was conducting the review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. In February Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice's multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.

The intelligence reports were summaries of monitored conversations -- primarily between foreign officials discussing the Trump transition, but also in some cases direct contact between members of the Trump team and monitored foreign officials. One U.S. official familiar with the reports said they contained valuable political information on the Trump transition such as whom the Trump team was meeting, the views of Trump associates on foreign policy matters and plans for the incoming administration.​

Clinton's getting ready to flee country.

 

[Rocko]

As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:

The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials

So they were spying on the Trump team thinking they could justify it with a technicality.

 

[The Original Tree]

As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:

The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials

The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.

But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and failure to have an order to declassify the documents is a Felony. Actually 2 felonies right there if you are counting.

None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.

If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it.
If this was authorized we would know exactly where the order came from.
if this was authorized we would know exactly who signed it.

It would all be PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE.

Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and without the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies!

So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.

I am thinking there were enough felonies committed here to put anyone who did it away for life.

 

[Rustic]

Susan Rice is a loopy corrupt kunt...

 

[aris2chat]

As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:

The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials

The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.

But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.

None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.

If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.

Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.

So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.

I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.

Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.

That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges

 

[Pop23]

Who else has that administration do this to?

 

[beagle9]

Does she realize she has committed a felony and is now risking jail time?

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One."...

The National Security Council's senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, was conducting the review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. In February Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice's multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.

The intelligence reports were summaries of monitored conversations -- primarily between foreign officials discussing the Trump transition, but also in some cases direct contact between members of the Trump team and monitored foreign officials. One U.S. official familiar with the reports said they contained valuable political information on the Trump transition such as whom the Trump team was meeting, the views of Trump associates on foreign policy matters and plans for the incoming administration.​

And ... ???

Was she bugging Trump Towers ???

And did BHO tell her to ???

The Obama administration might go down as being one of the most corrupt in history. It makes sense to, because Obama's threat to fundementally transform this nation is the smoking gun in which can be
Interpreted to me now as being to somehow defeat white power or minimize it somehow, and to control it into the very distant future. Also to defeat white power by transferring as much as humanly possible all future white wealth to boot, and to do this with all "Obama's" wealth transfer schemes as were concocted through the use of regulations, climate change, Obama care, and you name it. And to add a new one now "SURVIELENCE" !!!!!!!!!!

 

[beagle9]

Does she realize she has committed a felony and is now risking jail time?

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One."...

The National Security Council's senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, was conducting the review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. In February Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice's multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.

The intelligence reports were summaries of monitored conversations -- primarily between foreign officials discussing the Trump transition, but also in some cases direct contact between members of the Trump team and monitored foreign officials. One U.S. official familiar with the reports said they contained valuable political information on the Trump transition such as whom the Trump team was meeting, the views of Trump associates on foreign policy matters and plans for the incoming administration.​

Clinton's getting ready to flee country.

. She should be..

 

[Care4all]

the ONLY thing leaked so far is General Flynn's lie about not speaking with the Russian Ambassador about the sanctions the day the Obama administration issued new additional sanctions on Russia for their influence interference in our election process....

there have been no other leaks of any Trump campaigners that were classified....nothing from what Rice needed unmasked has been leaked, nothing from any conversation content or the actual transcripts of even Flynn's convos....just that they exist, on Flynn....

And they do exist.

That is how THE FBI exonerated him.

With Transcripts of His Surveillance.

Isn't that cool?

I think it is.

when did the FBI exonerate him?

Flynn not only lied to Pence about the convo, he lied to the FBI about it several times and FINALLY the FBI showed their hand by saying to Flynn, ARE YOU CERTAIN YOU WANT TO STICK BY WHAT YOU ARE TELLING US?

And Flynn took their cue that THEY KNEW HE TALKED WITH HIM and amended his testimony with the FBI leaving it as a 'possibility' that he may have talked with the Ambassador about the sanctions.'

Exactly how many times can you Lefty Morons pretend to Ignore Facts and carry on a Charade That You Know Is False?

FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Intelligence Official: Transcripts Of Flynn's Calls Don't Show Criminal Wrongdoing
NPR intel source: No evidence of wrongdoing in Flynn-Kislyak transcripts - Hot Air
FBI Again Says: Nothing Illicit In Flynn Case… | Weasel Zippers
Why Michael Flynn likely won't face charges under the Logan Act - CNNPolitics.com
FBI found no wrongdoing in Flynn’s calls with Russia: report
Freedom's Lighthouse » Report: FBI Finds “No evidence of wrongdoing or illicit ties” in Flynn Phone Calls with Russia – 1/24/17

I feel like I am teaching the 3rd grade repeating myself over, and over and over again, because the kids I teach are a bunch of phucking imbeciles!

thank you,....for the links.

yes, it's always the ''coverup'' that nails them!

Flynn should not have lied about the phone calls...as if he was ''covering'' something up he wanted to hide! And Flynn should not have lied to the VP, or to us....WHY he did this, is still unexplained.

 

[B. Kidd]

Rice was an Obama subordinate. So logically, she took her marching orders from Obama.

 

[aris2chat]

Who else has that administration do this to?

>>
WikiLeaks released the following list on February 23rd (see link here) of Obama Administration wire taps:

* The US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;
* Obama bugged Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone;
* Obama singled out the Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception;
* Obama stole sensitive Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu;
* Obama intercepted top EU and Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US “extort[ing]” them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed);
* Obama explicitly targeted five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers;
* Obama explicitly targetted the phones of Italy’s ambassador to NATO and other top Italian officials for long term interception; and
* Obama intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.

In addition to the above list we also know now that Obama wire tapped various individuals in the US media that were reporting information not flattering to the Obama Administration. It is widely known that Obama’s Justice Department targeted journalists with wiretaps in 2013:

* In 2013 the liberal Washington Post expressed outrage after the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks. The reporter, Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.
* Also in 2013, members of the Associated Press were also a target of the surveillance. The ultra liberal New Yorker even noted that “In moderate and liberal circles, at least, the phone-records scandal, partly because it involves the dear old A.P. and partly because it raises anew the specter of Big Brother, may well present the most serious threat to Obama’s reputation.”
* Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to the Obama administration. A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post.

Update – WikiLeaks tweeted overnight that the Obama Administration spied on their journalists as well:

View image on Twitter

https://twitter.com/wikileaks
<<

 

[bodecea]

What is funny is that you think any believe you know what you are talking about

What is funny is seeing that Obama is afraid to return to the borders of America. He knows he only has lies for answers.

Where is your evidence that Former President Obama is afraid to return to the borders of America?

 

[Votto]

In a sane nation, she would have been imprisoned long ago.

But in the current nation she will probably be appointed to SCOTUS

 

[Hutch Starskey]

As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:

The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials

The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.

But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.

None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.

If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.

Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.

So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.

I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.

Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.

That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges

Who has said that either Rice or Obama released anything?

 

[The Original Tree]

Who else has that administration done this to?

Here is some Truth. We only know for sure about General Flynn. But we also know Felony Espionage was committed when transcripts of President Trump's calls to Mexico, Thailand & Australia were also released. We also know according to what we have heard that many of Trump's Team were surveilled. Not much was found, but they were being spied on.

It's possible Obama used The NSA and Intelligence Agencies like he used The IRS as a weapon against his opposition.

He did fill up the organizational trees of The Intelligence Community with His Political Operatives, so this is very likely that this is what he was doing. He also spied on our allies. France, Germany, England.

Now for THE TRUTH.

You wouldn't need to ask your question if The Unmasking of any person was legal, or if any Intel on any person was given to THE PRESS.

Why?

Because you would know exactly who signed the release order or "Authorization for Unmasking" along with the order to declassify it, because then the "Intel" becomes Public Knowledge when Public Access is granted.

If WE The Public do not know how classified information ended up in The Press, then it was illegally obtained.

It is that simple.

 

[Votto]

In a sane nation, she would have been imprisoned long ago.

Contact your congressperson and tell him or her to change the law.

Traslation: Go bang your head against a wall.

 

[Rocko]

As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:

The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.

Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials

The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.

But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.

None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.

If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.

Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.

So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.

I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.

Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.

That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges

Who has said that either Rice or Obama released anything?

How do we know who's been unmasked?

 

[2aguy]

the ONLY thing leaked so far is General Flynn's lie about not speaking with the Russian Ambassador about the sanctions the day the Obama administration issued new additional sanctions on Russia for their influence interference in our election process....

there have been no other leaks of any Trump campaigners that were classified....nothing from what Rice needed unmasked has been leaked, nothing from any conversation content or the actual transcripts of even Flynn's convos....just that they exist, on Flynn....

And they do exist.

That is how THE FBI exonerated him.

With Transcripts of His Surveillance.

Isn't that cool?

I think it is.

when did the FBI exonerate him?

Flynn not only lied to Pence about the convo, he lied to the FBI about it several times and FINALLY the FBI showed their hand by saying to Flynn, ARE YOU CERTAIN YOU WANT TO STICK BY WHAT YOU ARE TELLING US?

And Flynn took their cue that THEY KNEW HE TALKED WITH HIM and amended his testimony with the FBI leaving it as a 'possibility' that he may have talked with the Ambassador about the sanctions.'

Exactly how many times can you Lefty Morons pretend to Ignore Facts and carry on a Charade That You Know Is False?

FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit
Intelligence Official: Transcripts Of Flynn's Calls Don't Show Criminal Wrongdoing
NPR intel source: No evidence of wrongdoing in Flynn-Kislyak transcripts - Hot Air
FBI Again Says: Nothing Illicit In Flynn Case… | Weasel Zippers
Why Michael Flynn likely won't face charges under the Logan Act - CNNPolitics.com
FBI found no wrongdoing in Flynn’s calls with Russia: report
Freedom's Lighthouse » Report: FBI Finds “No evidence of wrongdoing or illicit ties” in Flynn Phone Calls with Russia – 1/24/17

I feel like I am teaching the 3rd grade repeating myself over, and over and over again, because the kids I teach are a bunch of phucking imbeciles!

thank you,....for the links.

yes, it's always the ''coverup'' that nails them!

Flynn should not have lied about the phone calls...as if he was ''covering'' something up he wanted to hide! And Flynn should not have lied to the VP, or to us....WHY he did this, is still unexplained.

He didn't lie about the phone call.....and we don't know what he did or didn't tell the VP.....the only illegal act in the Flynn phone call....unmasking his identity...that is a felony.