Breaking: Three Muslim Students Murdered at Chapel Hill

lets take your figure then 200,000 innocent people m inimum killed by war of aggression...a trumped up war...redrum redrum
Who the fuck says they were all innocent?
They were killed in an illegal war of choice a war of aggression....they were minding their own business in their own country when we came and killed them...
The US is not obliged to ask permission of anyone when fighting a war. Congress gave the President the authority and power to wage war against a regime that was hell bent on creating nuclear weapons, chemical and biological weapons and hiring terrorists to carry out attacks. France, Russia and China are to blame for conspiring to remove sanctions and allowed Iraq back into those endeavors.

United Nations Special Commission - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

No, Iraq was under intense scrutiny from U.N. weapons inspectors, and that would have remained the case. Iran is and was a thousand times more likely to develop the bomb, but there was no nuclear program in Iraq, period.

There were no active terrorist connections in Iraq before the war.
Yes there were Or I guess you did not notice all the "retired" terrorists that lived in Iraq and were paid for b Saddam. Once again we had to act because Russia, China and France planned to remove sanctions as early as September of that year.

We opened the door to terrorists and infinitely more terrorism by invading Iraq.
 
That figure is a bald faced lie. And we all know it.
That means you have a source you consider better so link to it....
I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.
Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.

The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.
 
The shooter is a Prog Moonbat:

A review of the Facebook page of the man charged in these murders, Craig Hicks, shows a consistent theme of anti-religion and progressive causes. Included in his many Facebook “likes” are the Huffington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Freedom from Religion Foundation, Bill Nye “The Science Guy,” Neil deGrasse Tyson, gay marriage groups, and a host of anti-conservative/Tea Party pages.

Remarkably, one of the four Facebook groups he had joined was “Religious Tolerance.”...


Killer of 3 NC Muslim Students Was Hardcore Anti-Religion Atheist Progressive PJ Tatler
 
That means you have a source you consider better so link to it....
I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.
Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.

The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.

We are talking about the terror attacks that have proliferated since 9-11. You said it yourself, gassing the Kurds was a "terrorist act," but I said, "terror attacks."
 
That means you have a source you consider better so link to it....
I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.
Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.

The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.
rumsfeld-saddam.jpg
 
I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.
Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.

The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.

We are talking about the terror attacks that have proliferated since 9-11. You said it yourself, gassing the Kurds was a "terrorist act," but I said, "terror attacks."

Ok, moving the goalposts but you're still wrong. That is the reason we went in. Chemical Weapons are WMDs.
 
I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.
Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.

The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.
rumsfeld-saddam.jpg

Interesting but irrelevant.
 
Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.

The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.

We are talking about the terror attacks that have proliferated since 9-11. You said it yourself, gassing the Kurds was a "terrorist act," but I said, "terror attacks."

Ok, moving the goalposts but you're still wrong. That is the reason we went in. Chemical Weapons are WMDs.

Show us where the Bushies said they were invading because of chemical weapons.

Show us the inoperabe, degraded munitions found.

Show the HS chemistry labs.

You guys are so screwed when you make these arguments.
 
Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.

The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.
rumsfeld-saddam.jpg

Interesting but irrelevant.
Very relevant.
 
150211031042-craig-stephen-hicks-medium-169.jpg


Another sicko nutter with a gun kills three, apparently good people. Sad.

Not surprising though that some have an ignorant, knee-jerk reaction of hate. We see it here every single day.

As with everything else concerning Muslims, I'm sure there will a lot of lies from those haters about his shooting.


another subhuman white christian party member no doubt
 
I thought the title to this thread was more accurate than the one that just mentioned 3 muslims being murdered...since had it been a right leaning conservative/tea party/libertarian......it would have been in the title....and usually when it isn't one of those groups they are accused of it when the event first happens....


an atheist keeping up the tradition of atheist mass murder....the greatest mass murderers in history have been atheists.......

Hitler?
Catholic church?

Ever heard of 'em?

Love the way you spend all your time on this board posting "good guy with a gun" stories -- then the moment a bad guy with a gun pops up it's suddenly all about "religions"...

:eusa_hand:
 
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.

We are talking about the terror attacks that have proliferated since 9-11. You said it yourself, gassing the Kurds was a "terrorist act," but I said, "terror attacks."

Ok, moving the goalposts but you're still wrong. That is the reason we went in. Chemical Weapons are WMDs.

Show us where the Bushies said they were invading because of chemical weapons.

Show us the inoperabe, degraded munitions found.

Show the HS chemistry labs.

You guys are so screwed when you make these arguments.

Idiot.

Chemical weapons ARE WMDs you stupid shit. Are you going to say the Bush never mentioned WMDs? Pull your head out of your ass idiot.
 
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.
rumsfeld-saddam.jpg

Interesting but irrelevant.
Very relevant.

Meh, so says an idiot.
 
This is what happens when blind bigotry starts to run amok.
These three kids pay the price for the crimes of ISIS and died at the hands of America's best known homegrown product: the bigoted white redneck with a gun.


3 Muslim students shot to death in apartment near UNC Chapel Hill
3 Muslim students shot to death in apartment near UNC Chapel Hill - CNN.com

"""Police haven't said what may have compelled the accused, Craig Stephen Hicks, to allegedly carry out the attack Tuesday evening. He turned himself in to police later in the night.

But given the victims' religion and comments the alleged shooter apparently left on a Facebook page, many social media users wondered what role, if any, the victims' faith played.
The victims were Muslims: Deah Shaddy Barakat, 23; Yusor Mohammad, 21; and Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19.""""




Seriously, how stupid do you feel? The man is a raging lunatic progressive, just like you.
 
That means you have a source you consider better so link to it....
I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.
Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.

The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.
There was no terror in Iraq before the Bushes.

That is, unless you were one of the tens of thousands that pissed off Saddam Hussein.
 
There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.

We are talking about the terror attacks that have proliferated since 9-11. You said it yourself, gassing the Kurds was a "terrorist act," but I said, "terror attacks."

Ok, moving the goalposts but you're still wrong. That is the reason we went in. Chemical Weapons are WMDs.

Show us where the Bushies said they were invading because of chemical weapons.

Show us the inoperabe, degraded munitions found.

Show the HS chemistry labs.

You guys are so screwed when you make these arguments.

Idiot.

Chemical weapons ARE WMDs you stupid shit. Are you going to say the Bush never mentioned WMDs? Pull your head out of your ass idiot.
What you talking about!!!!!

A pressure cooker full of shaken out firecracker powder is a WMD.

Read the fuckin' indictment of Boston Bomb Boy.
 
I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.
Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.

The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.

There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.

Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.
There was no terror in Iraq before the Bushes.

That is, unless you were one of the tens of thousands that pissed off Saddam Hussein.
Saddam didn't allow al queda or isis in his country. Consider he may have been killing terrorists.
 
Of course you progressive idiots don't think that using chemical weapons to kill thousands of people you don't like to be a terrorist act. You people are low life scum.

We are talking about the terror attacks that have proliferated since 9-11. You said it yourself, gassing the Kurds was a "terrorist act," but I said, "terror attacks."

Ok, moving the goalposts but you're still wrong. That is the reason we went in. Chemical Weapons are WMDs.

Show us where the Bushies said they were invading because of chemical weapons.

Show us the inoperabe, degraded munitions found.

Show the HS chemistry labs.

You guys are so screwed when you make these arguments.

Idiot.

Chemical weapons ARE WMDs you stupid shit. Are you going to say the Bush never mentioned WMDs? Pull your head out of your ass idiot.
What you talking about!!!!!

A pressure cooker full of shaken out firecracker powder is a WMD.

Read the fuckin' indictment of Boston Bomb Boy.

Idk if you are serious or not, but at the time that Saddam was in power, the US along with the UN, concidered chemical weapons a WMD. I don't think they meant a home made bomb.
 

Forum List

Back
Top