ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
WOW how'd that happen when republicans think that liberals are "gun grabbers"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn't use an "Assualt Rifle"... he used a .38
Craig Hicks Chapel Hill Shooting Suspect Reportedly Shared Atheist Beliefs On Facebook
Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, was charged on Wednesday with murdering three members of a Muslim family in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The motivation for the killing is unclear, though police said their preliminary investigation showed that a parking dispute may have been at the root of the matter.
Hicks, however, appears to have spoken openly about his anti-religious views on what is reportedly his Facebook page. The page was frequently updated with quotes, cartoons and links representing these opinions.
In addition to the posts criticizing religion, the page also includes posts advocating equal rights for LGBT people and promoting freedom of speech.
Meanwhile your fellow lefties on this board in another thread claim the guy is a member of the tea party and a conservative red neck.I blame Obama and The Gay Agenda™.
I've never heard of a militant atheist. Sounds like an oxy moron.He didn't use an "Assualt Rifle"... he used a .38
Craig Hicks Chapel Hill Shooting Suspect Reportedly Shared Atheist Beliefs On Facebook
Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, was charged on Wednesday with murdering three members of a Muslim family in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The motivation for the killing is unclear, though police said their preliminary investigation showed that a parking dispute may have been at the root of the matter.
Hicks, however, appears to have spoken openly about his anti-religious views on what is reportedly his Facebook page. The page was frequently updated with quotes, cartoons and links representing these opinions.
In addition to the posts criticizing religion, the page also includes posts advocating equal rights for LGBT people and promoting freedom of speech.
over a parking stall yeah sure
the guy is a hard core leftist
and self described Militant atheist
Meanwhile your fellow lefties on this board in another thread claim the guy is a member of the tea party and a conservative red neck.I blame Obama and The Gay Agenda™.
I've never heard of a militant atheist. Sounds like an oxy moron.He didn't use an "Assualt Rifle"... he used a .38
Craig Hicks Chapel Hill Shooting Suspect Reportedly Shared Atheist Beliefs On Facebook
Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, was charged on Wednesday with murdering three members of a Muslim family in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The motivation for the killing is unclear, though police said their preliminary investigation showed that a parking dispute may have been at the root of the matter.
Hicks, however, appears to have spoken openly about his anti-religious views on what is reportedly his Facebook page. The page was frequently updated with quotes, cartoons and links representing these opinions.
In addition to the posts criticizing religion, the page also includes posts advocating equal rights for LGBT people and promoting freedom of speech.
over a parking stall yeah sure
the guy is a hard core leftist
and self described Militant atheist
He sounds confused and not at all like a person that leans left.I've never heard of a militant atheist. Sounds like an oxy moron.He didn't use an "Assualt Rifle"... he used a .38
Craig Hicks Chapel Hill Shooting Suspect Reportedly Shared Atheist Beliefs On Facebook
Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, was charged on Wednesday with murdering three members of a Muslim family in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The motivation for the killing is unclear, though police said their preliminary investigation showed that a parking dispute may have been at the root of the matter.
Hicks, however, appears to have spoken openly about his anti-religious views on what is reportedly his Facebook page. The page was frequently updated with quotes, cartoons and links representing these opinions.
In addition to the posts criticizing religion, the page also includes posts advocating equal rights for LGBT people and promoting freedom of speech.
over a parking stall yeah sure
the guy is a hard core leftist
and self described Militant atheist
well that is what he calls himself
so there ya go
That Obama and TH3 GAYZ are crafty like that.Meanwhile your fellow lefties on this board in another thread claim the guy is a member of the tea party and a conservative red neck.I blame Obama and The Gay Agenda™.
There's that trademark which denies me access to that title....I blame Obama and The Gay Agenda™.
He's still getting it wrong and embellishing it.....That Obama and TH3 GAYZ are crafty like that.Meanwhile your fellow lefties on this board in another thread claim the guy is a member of the tea party and a conservative red neck.I blame Obama and The Gay Agenda™.
Fascinating.Well...this is tragic...but when you consider what many Muslims have been doing lately it isnt surprising. They did kinda bring it on themselves...............oh shit, sorry, that logic only applies when innocent cops are murdered.
Keep proving just how stupid you are.I've never heard of a militant atheist. Sounds like an oxy moron.He didn't use an "Assualt Rifle"... he used a .38
Craig Hicks Chapel Hill Shooting Suspect Reportedly Shared Atheist Beliefs On Facebook
Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, was charged on Wednesday with murdering three members of a Muslim family in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The motivation for the killing is unclear, though police said their preliminary investigation showed that a parking dispute may have been at the root of the matter.
Hicks, however, appears to have spoken openly about his anti-religious views on what is reportedly his Facebook page. The page was frequently updated with quotes, cartoons and links representing these opinions.
In addition to the posts criticizing religion, the page also includes posts advocating equal rights for LGBT people and promoting freedom of speech.
over a parking stall yeah sure
the guy is a hard core leftist
and self described Militant atheist
You can use it as long as you pay me royalties.There's that trademark which denies me access to that title....I blame Obama and The Gay Agenda™.
good shoot ! a few thousand more and maybe they will get the hint they are not welcome in America
The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.That means you have a source you consider better so link to it....That figure is a bald faced lie. And we all know it.
The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
The US is not obliged to ask permission of anyone when fighting a war. Congress gave the President the authority and power to wage war against a regime that was hell bent on creating nuclear weapons, chemical and biological weapons and hiring terrorists to carry out attacks. France, Russia and China are to blame for conspiring to remove sanctions and allowed Iraq back into those endeavors.They were killed in an illegal war of choice a war of aggression....they were minding their own business in their own country when we came and killed them...Who the fuck says they were all innocent?lets take your figure then 200,000 innocent people m inimum killed by war of aggression...a trumped up war...redrum redrumI know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.That means you have a source you consider better so link to it....
No they were not. Most of the deaths from US action were enemies of ours. Granted there was some collateral damage but not a lot. And I sure as hell got tired of all the supposed peaceful weddings occurring in the god forsaken desert near nothing important.The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.That means you have a source you consider better so link to it....That figure is a bald faced lie. And we all know it.
The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.
Yes there were Or I guess you did not notice all the "retired" terrorists that lived in Iraq and were paid for b Saddam. Once again we had to act because Russia, China and France planned to remove sanctions as early as September of that year. Saddam maintained his nuclear team as proven by captured documents, equipment to return to research and dual purpose facilities to make chemical and biological weapons as well as the basics for it. All proven by captured material and documents and people.The US is not obliged to ask permission of anyone when fighting a war. Congress gave the President the authority and power to wage war against a regime that was hell bent on creating nuclear weapons, chemical and biological weapons and hiring terrorists to carry out attacks. France, Russia and China are to blame for conspiring to remove sanctions and allowed Iraq back into those endeavors.They were killed in an illegal war of choice a war of aggression....they were minding their own business in their own country when we came and killed them...Who the fuck says they were all innocent?lets take your figure then 200,000 innocent people m inimum killed by war of aggression...a trumped up war...redrum redrumI know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.
United Nations Special Commission - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
No, Iraq was under intense scrutiny from U.N. weapons inspectors, and that would have remained the case. Iran is and was a thousand times more likely to develop the bomb, but there was no nuclear program in Iraq, period.
There were no active terrorist connections in Iraq before the war.
No they were not. Most of the deaths from US action were enemies of ours. Granted there was some collateral damage but not a lot. And I sure as hell got tired of all the supposed peaceful weddings occurring in the god forsaken desert near nothing important.The war was not illegal. Congress approved it which is all that is required. Further MOST of the deaths were the result of terror attacks or insurgency not US or coalition action.Whether low ball or high ball, the figures are unacceptable morally.I know that the supposed proof you have has been discredited repeatedly for years. As for how many died ask the Iraq Government. Their number is around 200 thousand.That means you have a source you consider better so link to it....
The war was illegal, and our military forces were badly used, nearly broken, and we had scores of thousands of dead and wounded ourselves.
There were no terror attacks in Iraq before we invaded, and no, most of the deaths were from U.S. air strikes and bombardment.