BREAKING: Trey Gowdy Resigns From House Ethics Committee

The problem is that you don't understand ethics. If you did, you would know why the Democrats will not gain control of the House.


Well, who the fuck could argue against such a well-documented and objective assessment, correct sailor boy???......Go play with your rubber duck in a bathtub.
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????

I'm just wondering if usmb will have to create a whole new room for the whining distraught righties we will have to endure next year?

And wait until dirty don is in handcuffs. It will be a whiny time.
 
So he resigned from a committee...big fucking deal. Perhaps he is bored and wants on another committee like Ways and Means. This is a non-story.
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????
Because during most of that time she was being protected by Obam, Lynch, and Comey.
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????

I'm just wondering if usmb will have to create a whole new room for the whining distraught righties we will have to endure next year?

And wait until dirty don is in handcuffs. It will be a whiny time.

Methinks thou art in for a BIG disappointment!
 
So he resigned from a committee...big fucking deal. Perhaps he is bored and wants on another committee like Ways and Means. This is a non-story.

You've been addicted to the Hillary and Obama crack pipe for to long now. The country has grown tired of supporting your habit.
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????
Not to mention being caught altering documents to try and frame her.
 
GettyImages-543415630.jpg

Could Trey Gowdy be adopting this stance again soon?

Well . . . isn’t this interesting? He resigned on Wednesday.

View image on Twitter

Adam Parkhomenko

✔@AdamParkhomenko


Breaking: Trey Gowdy out as Member of Committee on Ethics

1:39 PM - Jan 13, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy


So, let’s see here. . . .

  • Trey Gowdy resigns from the House Ethics Committee,
  • Jason Chaffetz, former chair of the House Oversight Committee, just up and resigns, and
  • Devin Nunes needs to be protected by Paul Ryan, and is still trying to muck up investigations into Trump.
Is there a connection here? Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. . . .

BREAKING: Trey Gowdy resigns from House Ethics Committee
But how can he push for that H. Clinton Special Counsel now? Ruh-Roooooh!
Ruh-Rooooooh was Gowdy in his role on the Judiciary Committee, not the Ethics Committee.
 
So he resigned from a committee...big fucking deal. Perhaps he is bored and wants on another committee like Ways and Means. This is a non-story.

You've been addicted to the Hillary and Obama crack pipe for to long now. The country has grown tired of supporting your habit.
What is the big deal...he resinged from a committee. That is protocol and nothing more. If I could be on Ways and Means $$$$$ I sure as the hell would. Perhaps he might get a job in Trump administration? Perhaps he might seek governorship? Who knows? This is not a big fucking deal at all.
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????

I'm just wondering if usmb will have to create a whole new room for the whining distraught righties we will have to endure next year?

And wait until dirty don is in handcuffs. It will be a whiny time.

okmd3twuzfvy.jpg
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????
Not to mention being caught altering documents to try and frame her.
when?
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????
Not to mention being caught altering documents to try and frame her.
when?

In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:

Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.

In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:

This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.

Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.
CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton
 
So he resigned from a committee...big fucking deal. Perhaps he is bored and wants on another committee like Ways and Means. This is a non-story.
How's those H. Clinton indictments coming along?
 
So he resigned from a committee...big fucking deal. Perhaps he is bored and wants on another committee like Ways and Means. This is a non-story.

NO.......Gowdy flaunted himself as, and gained an infamous reputation as the "Grand Inquisitor".......Its like a football player in his prime quitting because taking up crochet was a more "soothing vocation".
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????
Not to mention being caught altering documents to try and frame her.
when?

In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:

Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.

In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:

This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.

Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.
CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

OMG, look at the source!

Please make it stop! The stupid is strong with this one!
 
So he resigned from a committee...big fucking deal. Perhaps he is bored and wants on another committee like Ways and Means. This is a non-story.

NO.......Gowdy flaunted himself as, and gained an infamous reputation as the "Grand Inquisitor".......Its like a football player in his prime quitting because taking up crochet was a more "soothing vocation".

He quit one of four committees because the workload was too much! It's like a football player that is on the kickoff, punt, offense and defensive teams wanting to stop covering kickoffs!

For Christ's sake, find a little bit of morality in your soul, or that dead and gone just like your brain?
 
No seriously, I'd settle just to see her behind bars for the crimes she committed.


Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????
Not to mention being caught altering documents to try and frame her.
when?

In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:

Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.

In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:

This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.

Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.
CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

OMG, look at the source!

Please make it stop! The stupid is strong with this one!
Feel free to read the source material...or are there not enough pictures for you?
 
Why don;t right wing morons ask Gowdy WHY after a 17 month investigation AND an 11 hours inquisition of Clinton........amid a right wing committee dominance, Clinton is still "walking free"????
Not to mention being caught altering documents to try and frame her.
when?

In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:

Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.

In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:

This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.

Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.
CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

OMG, look at the source!

Please make it stop! The stupid is strong with this one!
Feel free to read the source material...or are there not enough pictures for you?


I read it. It doesn't say what you think it does. It is a baseless accusation, with absolutely no truth. If the CIA was giving information to the Democrats instead of the committee as a whole, that is unethical and immoral.

Try again. Maybe you will get lucky one of these centuries!
 

Forum List

Back
Top