Bridgegate vs Benghazi

[Truthmatters]

he refused to return any attempt by fort lee people to talk to him.


hes toast

weird

 

[blastoff]

he refused to return any attempt by fort lee people to talk to him.


hes toast

weird

Not as weird as people talking to themselves via message board posts. But understandable in you're case.

 

[NoNukes]

yea i hear ya Yurt....i have seen a few on the left here say only Righties say that kind of shit about fellow Americans.....i guess they were lying....

Why would we dispute the truth?

You seldom tell the truth. Given that you lied about Benghazi, Fast and Furious, the IRS, the NRA, Obamacare. Then you resort to calling Republicans arsonists, anarchists, and terrorists.

Oh as if a traffic jam doesn't happen hundreds of thousands of times a day on any highway in America, why did this one suddenly pique your interest?

Give one example of me doing this.

 

[Clementine]

Ever since the bridgegate story broke, Republicans have been trying to deflect with Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi....

So let's look at the similarities and differences between the two

Well, both happened in September, I guess that is the same

With Benghazi, Obama claimed it was caused by a anti Islam film.......Republicans claim he lied
With Bridgegate, Christie claimed it was caused by the Mayor of Ft Lee not endorsing him.......Democrats claim he lied

In Benghazi, AlQaeda were the terrorists
In Ft Lee, Republicans were the terrorists

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Why would we dispute the truth?

You seldom tell the truth. Given that you lied about Benghazi, Fast and Furious, the IRS, the NRA, Obamacare. Then you resort to calling Republicans arsonists, anarchists, and terrorists.

Oh as if a traffic jam doesn't happen hundreds of thousands of times a day on any highway in America, why did this one suddenly pique your interest?

Give one example of me doing this.

Was I referring to you? Unless you have something to hide, I was referring to the Obama administration, not you.

 

[Sallow]

Ever since the bridgegate story broke, Republicans have been trying to deflect with Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi....

So let's look at the similarities and differences between the two

Well, both happened in September, I guess that is the same

With Benghazi, Obama claimed it was caused by a anti Islam film.......Republicans claim he lied
With Bridgegate, Christie claimed it was caused by the Mayor of Ft Lee not endorsing him.......Democrats claim he lied

In Benghazi, AlQaeda were the terrorists
In Ft Lee, Republicans were the terrorists

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Obama said no such thing.

And the state department was reading the CIA talking points on the morning shows and issued the caveat that it was a fluid situation.

That was corrected three, count them, three days later when the Administration said it might have been a coordinated attack.

Thanks to Issa's leaking of documents turned over to him, it was confirmed that the consulate was a CIA outpost that may have been holding prisoners..which may have been the reason for the attack.

But an independent investigation by the NYT confirms there was unrest due that stupid film. As there were in many cities in the Middle East.

But you folks have zero interest in that..or the deaths of Americans. You wanted to use this has a vehicle to unseat the President or impeach.

The hearings..have gone on longer than the 9/11 hears in which 3000 Americans were killed due to the incompetence of the Bush administration.

And Christie is a REPUBLICAN. Bridgegate is BAU. As was Jan Brewer's stopping live saving procedures for 3 Americans resulting in their deaths. Or Tim Pawlenty ignoring Federal Warnings of a dangerous bridge resulting in the deaths of 11 Americans.

 

[rightwinger]

Ever since the bridgegate story broke, Republicans have been trying to deflect with Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi....

So let's look at the similarities and differences between the two

Well, both happened in September, I guess that is the same

With Benghazi, Obama claimed it was caused by a anti Islam film.......Republicans claim he lied
With Bridgegate, Christie claimed it was caused by the Mayor of Ft Lee not endorsing him.......Democrats claim he lied

In Benghazi, AlQaeda were the terrorists
In Ft Lee, Republicans were the terrorists

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Republicans need to reconcile what it means to be a Republican

A Northeast Republican is not the same as a Bible Belt Republican. If the party insists on Bible Belt as the standard, they will never win another national election

 

[Redfish]

Ever since the bridgegate story broke, Republicans have been trying to deflect with Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi....

So let's look at the similarities and differences between the two

Well, both happened in September, I guess that is the same

With Benghazi, Obama claimed it was caused by a anti Islam film.......Republicans claim he lied
With Bridgegate, Christie claimed it was caused by the Mayor of Ft Lee not endorsing him.......Democrats claim he lied

In Benghazi, AlQaeda were the terrorists
In Ft Lee, Republicans were the terrorists

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Obama said no such thing.

And the state department was reading the CIA talking points on the morning shows and issued the caveat that it was a fluid situation.

That was corrected three, count them, three days later when the Administration said it might have been a coordinated attack.

Thanks to Issa's leaking of documents turned over to him, it was confirmed that the consulate was a CIA outpost that may have been holding prisoners..which may have been the reason for the attack.

But an independent investigation by the NYT confirms there was unrest due that stupid film. As there were in many cities in the Middle East.

But you folks have zero interest in that..or the deaths of Americans. You wanted to use this has a vehicle to unseat the President or impeach.

The hearings..have gone on longer than the 9/11 hears in which 3000 Americans were killed due to the incompetence of the Bush administration.

Wow, that is a big pile of steaming bullshit.

let me jus correct a couple of your lies.

1. there is absolutely no proof that anyone in the mid east ever even viewed the stupid video, much less that they decided to attack an ameriican embassy because of it.

2. Obama was still blaming the video in his UN speech weeks later

3. The obama admin has blocked Issa's investigation in every possible way. If there is nothing to hide, why not let it all come out and make Issa look foolish?

4. If the CIA was using Benghazi as a staging area to get weapons to radicals in Syria or as a jail for political prisoners, why would you not want to know that?

 

[Redfish]

Ever since the bridgegate story broke, Republicans have been trying to deflect with Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi....

So let's look at the similarities and differences between the two

Well, both happened in September, I guess that is the same

With Benghazi, Obama claimed it was caused by a anti Islam film.......Republicans claim he lied
With Bridgegate, Christie claimed it was caused by the Mayor of Ft Lee not endorsing him.......Democrats claim he lied

In Benghazi, AlQaeda were the terrorists
In Ft Lee, Republicans were the terrorists

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Republicans need to reconcile what it means to be a Republican

A Northeast Republican is not the same as a Bible Belt Republican. If the party insists on Bible Belt as the standard, they will never win another national election

Democrats need to reconcile what it means to be a democrat

A left coast democrat is not the same as a mid west democrat. If the party insists on left coast as the standard, they will never win another national election.

Tit for tat.

 

[Sallow]

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Obama said no such thing.

And the state department was reading the CIA talking points on the morning shows and issued the caveat that it was a fluid situation.

That was corrected three, count them, three days later when the Administration said it might have been a coordinated attack.

Thanks to Issa's leaking of documents turned over to him, it was confirmed that the consulate was a CIA outpost that may have been holding prisoners..which may have been the reason for the attack.

But an independent investigation by the NYT confirms there was unrest due that stupid film. As there were in many cities in the Middle East.

But you folks have zero interest in that..or the deaths of Americans. You wanted to use this has a vehicle to unseat the President or impeach.

The hearings..have gone on longer than the 9/11 hears in which 3000 Americans were killed due to the incompetence of the Bush administration.

Wow, that is a big pile of steaming bullshit.

let me jus correct a couple of your lies.

1. there is absolutely no proof that anyone in the mid east ever even viewed the stupid video, much less that they decided to attack an ameriican embassy because of it.

2. Obama was still blaming the video in his UN speech weeks later

3. The obama admin has blocked Issa's investigation in every possible way. If there is nothing to hide, why not let it all come out and make Issa look foolish?

4. If the CIA was using Benghazi as a staging area to get weapons to radicals in Syria or as a jail for political prisoners, why would you not want to know that?

What the heck do you mean? It was translated into Arabic and shown on Youtube. People in the middle east protested it all over the place. Now you're lying.

And Obama was DENOUNCING the film. Which was appropriate.

There was NO BLOCKING of the investigation. Issa wanted MORE classified documents to leak to the Press. That was stopped.

And if you think that classified information should be leaked to the press, then I am sure you think Manning and Snowden are heroes.

I don't.

 

[Yurt]

Ever since the bridgegate story broke, Republicans have been trying to deflect with Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi....

So let's look at the similarities and differences between the two

Well, both happened in September, I guess that is the same

With Benghazi, Obama claimed it was caused by a anti Islam film.......Republicans claim he lied
With Bridgegate, Christie claimed it was caused by the Mayor of Ft Lee not endorsing him.......Democrats claim he lied

In Benghazi, AlQaeda were the terrorists
In Ft Lee, Republicans were the terrorists

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Republicans need to reconcile what it means to be a Republican

A Northeast Republican is not the same as a Bible Belt Republican. If the party insists on Bible Belt as the standard, they will never win another national election

what kind of democrat was obama when he opposed gay marriage?

prediction: phony RW will ignore this because it hurts his point

 

[Sallow]

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Republicans need to reconcile what it means to be a Republican

A Northeast Republican is not the same as a Bible Belt Republican. If the party insists on Bible Belt as the standard, they will never win another national election

Democrats need to reconcile what it means to be a democrat

A left coast democrat is not the same as a mid west democrat. If the party insists on left coast as the standard, they will never win another national election.

Tit for tat.

Obama is what? Left coast or mid west?

 

[Yurt]

he refused to return any attempt by fort lee people to talk to him.


hes toast

weird

Not as weird as people talking to themselves via message board posts. But understandable in you're case.

 

[rightwinger]

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Republicans need to reconcile what it means to be a Republican

A Northeast Republican is not the same as a Bible Belt Republican. If the party insists on Bible Belt as the standard, they will never win another national election

Democrats need to reconcile what it means to be a democrat

A left coast democrat is not the same as a mid west democrat. If the party insists on left coast as the standard, they will never win another national election.

Tit for tat.

If that is the case, Democrats are doing pretty good

They have won the last two elections running a mid west Democrat who built a coalition with the east and west coast and received an overwhelming majority of the vote in swing states

If Republicans cannot bust that up they will never win the White House again

 

[Harry Dresden]

why is it the far lefties on this site get away with calling republicans terrorists?

no on the left says boo about it.

says much about the left.

yea i hear ya Yurt....i have seen a few on the left here say only Righties say that kind of shit about fellow Americans.....i guess they were lying....

Why would we dispute the truth?

there are just as many asshole politicians on the left as there is on the right.....both parties are fucking this country and the only ones who cant figure that out are the die-hard party people from each side...are you one of them Nukes?....

 

[Yurt]

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Republicans need to reconcile what it means to be a Republican

A Northeast Republican is not the same as a Bible Belt Republican. If the party insists on Bible Belt as the standard, they will never win another national election

what kind of democrat was obama when he opposed gay marriage?

prediction: phony RW will ignore this because it hurts his point

and as i predicted, rightwinger ignored this

he is a pussy, he only responds to posts he thinks he is right, but when shown wrong, he runs faster than jakestarkey

 

[rightwinger]

Careful calling Christie a Republican. He doesn't even know what the hell he is yet. And what a RINO governor does will never compare to what a president does.

Obama claimed it was caused by a film, the State Dept itself now states the group was tied to al Qaeda. Obama never corrected himself and was out there instantly claimed it was the filmmaker's fault and bashed him more than the actual murderers. For almost an entire year, the administration was silent and failed to cooperate with investigators. Lying about a terrorist plot in order to protect terrorists is far more serious than some stupid little scandal. Both are serious enough to fire people and charge them, but Benghazi should concern the entire country because we are all less secure with terrorist-friendly people in the administration.

There was a lot going on after the hurricanes, yet the media stopped covering the suffering and pretended that Obama had saved everyone and things were great.

The biggest difference in the two scandals is that while Christie might be fucking over some people in his state, Obama is fucking over the whole country and our allies.

Republicans need to reconcile what it means to be a Republican

A Northeast Republican is not the same as a Bible Belt Republican. If the party insists on Bible Belt as the standard, they will never win another national election

what kind of democrat was obama when he opposed gay marriage?

prediction: phony RW will ignore this because it hurts his point

OK ...Yurt has been whimpering for my attention all morning
Let me throw him a bone

When Obama ran for election in 2008 he believed the term marriage should be reserved for heterosexual marriage and that civil unions were a reasonable alternative

Since 2008, President Obama, like most of America, has reassessed that opinion and no longer believes that Civil Union is "good enough" for gays

Since President Obama came out in favor of gay marriage, 14 states have changed their laws to allow it

 

[Harry Dresden]

It seems to me that the average American working class citizen that abides by the rules is the most hated, naïve, fucked over, scapegoated, dumbwitted, resilient human being on earth, yet have the most envied and coveted sought after life lot according to most hated, naïve, fucked over, scapegoated, dumbwitted, resilient people all across the world. Republicans sell them out. Democrats sell them out. Illegal aliens sell them out…and yes they are so dumb they even sell out themselves. If you haven’t heard by now the examples of such “outsales” then you’re probably even dumber than the republicans, democrats, illegal aliens and yes the average American working class citizen think you are. I get why stupid people are ashamed and hide in the shadows of the debate playing field…I get why democrats are ashamed to bring their exploited hard luck political pawns to a dinner date at a fancy restaurant…I even get why republicans are ashamed of being so unabashedly, hypocritically unashamed about the treasonistic cumming over cheap labor. But what about the illegal aliens themselves…what are they ashamed about…what makes them tick? Are they ashamed of birthing or pawning (as in chess) children and families under such uncertain conditions? Enquiring minds want to know. You see it’s easy to dismiss the debated debacle by saying “hey if it was me in Mexico I’d do the same thing”. I’m not so sure. Let’s think for a moment that the average American working class citizen that abides by the rules actually wanted illegal aliens moving into their neighborhoods in such a way that made the Nazi occupation look informal…their rates of pay would decrease by about 15-30 percent (but making goods cheaper lol), citizens would be forced out of affordable housing due to overcrowding and ethnic bias in low income regions, rampant fraud, identity theft and Federal document falsification, Road and freeway congestion along with recreational overcrowding of public and private pleasantries, citizens would be susceptible to unchecked disease, accidental liability of all kinds, culture clash and the inability to communicate with the people your surrounded with, alienation, dangerous neglection of Samaritan help from fear of police involvement, essentially living in a rogue society where nobody around you but you can be held accountable for their actions (hmm kinda sounds like Mexico hmmm living irony) where things like law, morality and necessity come into play, which is essential for living in a society. In other words…chaos. I say this as if it were a hypothetical but guess what kiddies…its all real life ohhh its so cool! What moral dilemma erupts in a human being knowing they are illegally fleeing to a society where at least half of its inhabitants do not want them there and for many good logical reasons that we as a society have all agreed upon. Such a strong dilemma that surely the thought of united revolution in one’s home country comes to mind how can it not. But instead we see this revolution take place in Los Angeles instead of Mexico…oh goodie. Surely feelings of inadequacy must come to fruition in oneself when faced with the brutal realization that a race that prides itself on machismo, nationalistic pride and personal spiritual glory must have a sense of failure where this is concerned. The game of baseball can only be played by players of baseball…if a team member’s wife takes the field it is considered and is cheating. America like most societies on planet earth is like a baseball game. You’re not allowed to cheat thus making it unfair for the players ( see average American working class citizen ). One example is the 2008 bailout. Many people that chose to save their money and not go into debt and not sign stupid loans that predicted the bubble burst were waiting patiently for mass foreclosures on stupid people who couldn’t pay their bills like a natural evolution. But cheating set in and the people who played by the rules were cheated out of their new lives they worked and waited patiently for by the government, republicans, democrats, everyone. So how do illegal immigrants feel about cheating? Do they care? I don’t really know if I see caring about such things when I see that deer in the headlights look I see every day everywhere in sunny Southern California. In fact I hear support for amnesty because the cheating has gone on so long. So let’s say average American working class citizen that abides by the rules just can’t abide anymore because of other people who can’t abide by the rules (see whole fucking essay) sells oxycodone on the street to an undercover cop and that cop busts him. If they tell him they’ve been doing this for 20 years without getting caught does the police officer... A) ask for an autograph? B) feel twice as good he’s done such a good job catching a long active thief and bangs their head against a door? Or…C) Let’s average American working class citizen that abides by the rules go. If you chose B you’re a fucking winner. Good for you. Now…maybe we could lay off our own citizens in times of crisis and not use valuable resources to throw harmless drug users in jail but instead use those undercover skills and taxpayer dollars to conquer exploitative scrupulous employers, fine them more than the current 250 bucks and jail them for doing way more damage than a self-inflicted drug buzz could ever do. The deportation and expulsion of illegal immigrants from the United States of America would take care of itself free of charge. I’m not trying to get political cuz that’s not what this is about…this is about feeling…about morality…emotion…what’s right and wrong. It’s about all the things Jesus talks about. So my question is this…what would you, the illegal aliens living in this country like to say to your average American working class citizen that abides by the rules that live in the shadows in silence? (get an interpreter!)

Paragraphs are your friend

or cliff notes....

 

[Yurt]

Republicans need to reconcile what it means to be a Republican

A Northeast Republican is not the same as a Bible Belt Republican. If the party insists on Bible Belt as the standard, they will never win another national election

what kind of democrat was obama when he opposed gay marriage?

prediction: phony RW will ignore this because it hurts his point

OK ...Yurt has been whimpering for my attention all morning
Let me throw him a bone

When Obama ran for election in 2008 he believed the term marriage should be reserved for heterosexual marriage and that civil unions were a reasonable alternative

Since 2008, President Obama, like most of America, has reassessed that opinion and no longer believes that Civil Union is "good enough" for gays

Since President Obama came out in favor of gay marriage, 14 states have changed their laws to allow it

so obama held the opinion of most repubs and you are now making excuses for him. face it bub, your lib leader held the same beliefs as most repubs, but now you back peddle.

how proud you must you be. always standing by your leader, no matter his waffle. how proud. enjoy your waffle and now i know why you "ignore" my posts.

 

[RandomVariable]

Ah, forget it. Too much trouble to fix.