No, please don't take this down to that sort of level with the "that's a shame" and "you're crying" bullshit (and I call it "bullshit" because that's what it is).
Am I claiming I'm absolutely correct in my stance? No. I'm just saying (after spending some time scouring the internet following your post) that I cannot find any primary source evidence of Saddam or any of his top commanders actively threatening the United States, or instances of US intelligence networks hearing/seeing/reading a threat.
And this doesn't shock me because it would make no sense for Saddam to threaten the US and provoke an overthrow/occupation.
That is my point. I'm trying to work with you here.
But, Putin would be a primary source that HE informed Bush of such a threat. I have no reason to believe or not to believe him when he said that Russia's secret service had information on more than one occasion that Iraq was preparing acts of terror in the US and its facilities worldwide.
So, we can dispute that Saddam himself was behind the threat or that it was a "legitimate" threat. But, when Putin says in a speech in Kazakhstan that he transmitted the threat directly to Bush, it falls to you to prove that he didn't actually tell Bush that such a threat existed.
Last edited: