U2Edge
Gold Member
- Sep 15, 2012
- 5,272
- 1,197
1441 stated that Saddam was already in violation of multiple UN security council resolutions as well as the Gulf War Ceacefire.
That is not a response to my question. "Who declared Saddam Hussein to be in violation of UNSC Resolution 1441 which granted Iraq a final opportunity to comply?"
Do you wish to try again? Do you know what giving Iraq a final opportunity to comply means?
1441 already states that Iraq is in material breach of its obligations. The resolution itself is saying that SADDAM IS IN VIOLATION of it.
Nothing within the body of the resolution 1441 says that Hans Blix or any other inspector is to be given months on end to investigate worthless claims in order to stall an invasion and regime removal they do not want to happen. Hans Blix did not really care what Saddam did or did not have, he only cared about attempting to prevent the United States and other member states from removing the problem, which in this case was SADDAM.
Its baffling the lengths that people will go to too defend a dishonest mass murderer like SADDAM!