But, Trump hates gays? Except for the gay guy he just appointed, making history...

You're an idiot. Don't ever change.

Probably smarter than you, tough guy.

At least I give answers. you just bitch about Trump and then deflect when it is pointed out that predecessors, including the one who's dick you suck have done pretty much the same thing.

But now it's different, because, shut up.

I said you leg-humping worshipers of Trump were okay with it, and you confirmed it - adding your whataboutism and irrelevancies as to my alleged hackism. You really are an idiot.

So no President has ever made interim appointments before? Has Trump exceeded previous values of said appointments?

"So"? Did anyone ever claim that, or is that just a rhetorical device you use to pretend someone made an argument they didn't make?

You are reacting like you believe it to be the case. Again, it goes into my OPINION that the only reason you give a shit about this is because you think it hurts Trump, thus making you a hack.

No, I'm not. That's why you had to use "so".

That your concern is my alleged hackery makes you a deflecting, trolling Trumpkin. No worries. I can understand why you'd rather criticize me than defend him.
 
Melania is either dumb as hell or a gold digger.
Former prostitute
The Daily Mail had to come up with several million dollars because they made that accusation and couldn't prove it. How much do you think you will have to come up with?
Oh.....I forgot
She was not a prostitute, she was a “fashion model” for an agency that offered escorts on the side.

What is your evidence for this?

What's past is prologue. Melania used to have degrees in design and architecture. Yes, I know that's an illogical way to say it, but that's the way it is.

She never had degrees. What she does have is a certain skill set that is in high demand in certain circles.
 
Probably smarter than you, tough guy.

At least I give answers. you just bitch about Trump and then deflect when it is pointed out that predecessors, including the one who's dick you suck have done pretty much the same thing.

But now it's different, because, shut up.

I said you leg-humping worshipers of Trump were okay with it, and you confirmed it - adding your whataboutism and irrelevancies as to my alleged hackism. You really are an idiot.

So no President has ever made interim appointments before? Has Trump exceeded previous values of said appointments?

"So"? Did anyone ever claim that, or is that just a rhetorical device you use to pretend someone made an argument they didn't make?

You are reacting like you believe it to be the case. Again, it goes into my OPINION that the only reason you give a shit about this is because you think it hurts Trump, thus making you a hack.

No, I'm not. That's why you had to use "so".

That your concern is my alleged hackery makes you a deflecting, trolling Trumpkin. No worries. I can understand why you'd rather criticize me than defend him.

I am criticizing you motives, and so far you haven't made me thing anything else of you but hack.
 
What is your evidence for this?

What's past is prologue. Melania used to have degrees in design and architecture. Yes, I know that's an illogical way to say it, but that's the way it is.

That doesn't answer the question: What is the evidence that she worked as an escort for this agency?

I have no evidence as to that. Why would I? I've never hired an escort.

Then I'm not entirely sure what the point of your previous post was.

My point was her biography is an invention.

I didn't know about the whole website controversy but I will say that the claim she worked as an escort was not mentioned there.

It was brought up by some guy named Adam Schlecter in his book From the Whorehouse to the White House. It's little more than a long article published in book form (it's only 58 pages) by an independent publisher that no longer exists.

However, no one seems to know who this guy is and the one time somebody actually talked to him about his claims, he refused to give any details.
 
It is funny the things left wingers have to make up to try to win elections. Trump has had no history of homophobia...but that didn't stop the democrats...they just f*****g made it up.....their democrat hacks in the press repeated it...over and over .....as did their democrat hacks in hollywood..........

Now Trump has done something that guy with the funny name....who was President before Trump....didn't do....

And how many gays did obama have in his cabinet?

You left wingers are such asshats.....

Democrats and Media attack Trump's choice of Richard Grenell for Acting Director of National Intelligence

Richard Grenell made history when President Donald Trump appointed him as the U.S. Ambassador to Germany because he was the first openly gay man to serve at such a high level in an administration.

Grenell made history again on Wednesday night when Trump picked him as his acting Director of National intelligence.

Grenell is the first openly gay person to serve on a president’s Cabinet.

Then why has the orange whore appointed absolute pigs to major positions in all executive-branch departments who have sought to issue or alter regulations with the intent to dismantle legal protections for LGBTs, when everybody knows that the LGBT community has been under continuous attack by every manner of scumbag? He even pals around with the likes of frankie graham, a known hate monger.

This thread is pure BS.


The LGBTQWDCRSGEM%$DG community hasn't been under attack...if anything they are a protected group beyond the protections of actual victim groups.....

You asshats have to keep pushing the lie since nothing you say is factually true...

Denial ain't just a river in Egypt. The amount of discrimination and vitriol aimed at the LGBTQ community is common knowledge and in the news almost daily, and has been for years.
 
I said you leg-humping worshipers of Trump were okay with it, and you confirmed it - adding your whataboutism and irrelevancies as to my alleged hackism. You really are an idiot.

So no President has ever made interim appointments before? Has Trump exceeded previous values of said appointments?

"So"? Did anyone ever claim that, or is that just a rhetorical device you use to pretend someone made an argument they didn't make?

You are reacting like you believe it to be the case. Again, it goes into my OPINION that the only reason you give a shit about this is because you think it hurts Trump, thus making you a hack.

No, I'm not. That's why you had to use "so".

That your concern is my alleged hackery makes you a deflecting, trolling Trumpkin. No worries. I can understand why you'd rather criticize me than defend him.

I am criticizing you motives, and so far you haven't made me thing anything else of you but hack.

Oh, well, if it's just my motives, that's different.

No, it's not. You're a hysterical goof.

Whenever I give thought to my motives, my first question is, "what would Marty think?" You funny.
 
What's past is prologue. Melania used to have degrees in design and architecture. Yes, I know that's an illogical way to say it, but that's the way it is.

That doesn't answer the question: What is the evidence that she worked as an escort for this agency?

I have no evidence as to that. Why would I? I've never hired an escort.

Then I'm not entirely sure what the point of your previous post was.

My point was her biography is an invention.

I didn't know about the whole website controversy but I will say that the claim she worked as an escort was not mentioned there.

It was brought up by some guy named Adam Schlecter in his book From the Whorehouse to the White House. It's little more than a long article published in book form (it's only 58 pages) by an independent publisher that no longer exists.

However, no one seems to know who this guy is and the one time somebody actually talked to him about his claims, he refused to give any details.

My uninformed opinion is that when dealing with people who have fictitious biographies - or multiple multi-million $ fraud settlements - in their past, their words should be taken with a truckload of salt. Call me crazy.
 
So no President has ever made interim appointments before? Has Trump exceeded previous values of said appointments?

"So"? Did anyone ever claim that, or is that just a rhetorical device you use to pretend someone made an argument they didn't make?

You are reacting like you believe it to be the case. Again, it goes into my OPINION that the only reason you give a shit about this is because you think it hurts Trump, thus making you a hack.

No, I'm not. That's why you had to use "so".

That your concern is my alleged hackery makes you a deflecting, trolling Trumpkin. No worries. I can understand why you'd rather criticize me than defend him.

I am criticizing you motives, and so far you haven't made me thing anything else of you but hack.

Oh, well, if it's just my motives, that's different.

No, it's not. You're a hysterical goof.

Whenever I give thought to my motives, my first question is, "what would Marty think?" You funny.

Being snide just shows you don't want to discuss the issues at hand.
 
"So"? Did anyone ever claim that, or is that just a rhetorical device you use to pretend someone made an argument they didn't make?

You are reacting like you believe it to be the case. Again, it goes into my OPINION that the only reason you give a shit about this is because you think it hurts Trump, thus making you a hack.

No, I'm not. That's why you had to use "so".

That your concern is my alleged hackery makes you a deflecting, trolling Trumpkin. No worries. I can understand why you'd rather criticize me than defend him.

I am criticizing you motives, and so far you haven't made me thing anything else of you but hack.

Oh, well, if it's just my motives, that's different.

No, it's not. You're a hysterical goof.

Whenever I give thought to my motives, my first question is, "what would Marty think?" You funny.

Being snide just shows you don't want to discuss the issues at hand.

My motives aren't the issue. If it's snide to tell you that, you're way too delicate.
 
You are reacting like you believe it to be the case. Again, it goes into my OPINION that the only reason you give a shit about this is because you think it hurts Trump, thus making you a hack.

No, I'm not. That's why you had to use "so".

That your concern is my alleged hackery makes you a deflecting, trolling Trumpkin. No worries. I can understand why you'd rather criticize me than defend him.

I am criticizing you motives, and so far you haven't made me thing anything else of you but hack.

Oh, well, if it's just my motives, that's different.

No, it's not. You're a hysterical goof.

Whenever I give thought to my motives, my first question is, "what would Marty think?" You funny.

Being snide just shows you don't want to discuss the issues at hand.

My motives aren't the issue. If it's snide to tell you that, you're way too delicate.

Bring it, bitch.

Your motives are the crux of the issue. Trump to me is simply someone who is doing what he said he would do (mostly). Trump to you is the devil, the anti-christ of your SJW replacement religion of progressivism.
 
You are reacting like you believe it to be the case. Again, it goes into my OPINION that the only reason you give a shit about this is because you think it hurts Trump, thus making you a hack.

No, I'm not. That's why you had to use "so".

That your concern is my alleged hackery makes you a deflecting, trolling Trumpkin. No worries. I can understand why you'd rather criticize me than defend him.

I am criticizing you motives, and so far you haven't made me thing anything else of you but hack.

Oh, well, if it's just my motives, that's different.

No, it's not. You're a hysterical goof.

Whenever I give thought to my motives, my first question is, "what would Marty think?" You funny.

Being snide just shows you don't want to discuss the issues at hand.

My motives aren't the issue. If it's snide to tell you that, you're way too delicate.
Seems like the leftist patronizing baboons are more pissed when Trump is shown not to be racist.

That sums up why every stupid pathetic disgusting lying patronizing racist like you are such utter dirtbags.

You pathetic loser
 
Trump does nothing for anyone other than Trump. All political theater.
Ahhhh, got it. So talking a good game like your stupid fake Indian arm waving skinnycuuunt is more convincing than someone actually appointing a homo to an actual position that no democrat ever did?

You stupid pathetic ape.
 
No, I'm not. That's why you had to use "so".

That your concern is my alleged hackery makes you a deflecting, trolling Trumpkin. No worries. I can understand why you'd rather criticize me than defend him.

I am criticizing you motives, and so far you haven't made me thing anything else of you but hack.

Oh, well, if it's just my motives, that's different.

No, it's not. You're a hysterical goof.

Whenever I give thought to my motives, my first question is, "what would Marty think?" You funny.

Being snide just shows you don't want to discuss the issues at hand.

My motives aren't the issue. If it's snide to tell you that, you're way too delicate.

Bring it, bitch.

Your motives are the crux of the issue. Trump to me is simply someone who is doing what he said he would do (mostly). Trump to you is the devil, the anti-christ of your SJW replacement religion of progressivism.

If saying it made it so, you'd be the happiest Trumpkin in the patch. You're just a yammering yahoo in cyberspace who doesn't know how to defend leghumping the Chosen One except by attacking others. Does that work in your circle?
 
No, I'm not. That's why you had to use "so".

That your concern is my alleged hackery makes you a deflecting, trolling Trumpkin. No worries. I can understand why you'd rather criticize me than defend him.

I am criticizing you motives, and so far you haven't made me thing anything else of you but hack.

Oh, well, if it's just my motives, that's different.

No, it's not. You're a hysterical goof.

Whenever I give thought to my motives, my first question is, "what would Marty think?" You funny.

Being snide just shows you don't want to discuss the issues at hand.

My motives aren't the issue. If it's snide to tell you that, you're way too delicate.
Seems like the leftist patronizing baboons are more pissed when Trump is shown not to be racist.

That sums up why every stupid pathetic disgusting lying patronizing racist like you are such utter dirtbags.

You pathetic loser

Lonely loons lash out, I guess.
 
Trump does nothing for anyone other than Trump. All political theater.
TDS
TDS indeed.....
upload_2020-2-21_9-0-20.jpeg
 
It is funny the things left wingers have to make up to try to win elections. Trump has had no history of homophobia...but that didn't stop the democrats...they just f*****g made it up.....their democrat hacks in the press repeated it...over and over .....as did their democrat hacks in hollywood..........

Now Trump has done something that guy with the funny name....who was President before Trump....didn't do....

And how many gays did obama have in his cabinet?

You left wingers are such asshats.....

Democrats and Media attack Trump's choice of Richard Grenell for Acting Director of National Intelligence

Richard Grenell made history when President Donald Trump appointed him as the U.S. Ambassador to Germany because he was the first openly gay man to serve at such a high level in an administration.

Grenell made history again on Wednesday night when Trump picked him as his acting Director of National intelligence.

Grenell is the first openly gay person to serve on a president’s Cabinet.

tRumps wife certainly won't touch him, maybe he's going to the other side of the street like you.






Ahhhhh, look at the widdle homophobe.

Face it fruity mcfly, Trump is no more anti gay than you are a millionaire.
Ruh Roooooh! Irony Alert!
 

Forum List

Back
Top