California laws preventing S&W and Ruger from selling guns.

[RoadVirus]

Fuck Kalifornia.

Already been done. The Libturds have raped it to death.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Hopefully other states will soon follow suit.

[MENTION=39768]hazlnut[/MENTION]

Please visit this website, maybe they can convince you:

?* Gays with Guns *?

 

[Synthaholic]

I've always liked the idea of regulating ammunition, which isn't protected under the 2nd.

 

[OKTexas]

It would serve CA right if all gun and ammo manufacturers quit selling to law enforcement except at highly inflated prices to make up for their lost revenue in the private market.

That's illegal.

Wrong, different companies would be affected differently so the mark up would be different so no price fixing would be involved.

 

[OKTexas]

I've always liked the idea of regulating ammunition, which isn't protected under the 2nd.

Actually it is, without it firearms are not firearms, they are paper weights.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

I've always liked the idea of regulating ammunition, which isn't protected under the 2nd.

Well, electronic communications aren't regulated aren't the fourth, because electronic communications didn't' exist back then....

GTFO MORON

 

[westwall]

Make a bar code out of the rifling in the barrels. There are infinite variations that can be used in the width and spacing of the grooves.

Simple idea? Yes.

Simple to implement? No...and it would only present an improvement of the current method of identifying which rifled barrel a bullet went through on its way out of the gun. Barrel marks are similar to fingerprints.

California lawmakers are collectively STUPID!

Everytime you clean a barrel you change the lands and grooves. I doubt a bar code could survive the passage of a bullet.

 

[westwall]

I've always liked the idea of regulating ammunition, which isn't protected under the 2nd.

Wrong.

 

[Politico]

It would serve CA right if all gun and ammo manufacturers quit selling to law enforcement except at highly inflated prices to make up for their lost revenue in the private market.

Law Enforcement is specifically "exempt" from having to use firearms with this technology according to the California law.
They thought about that too when writing the law.

.

Of course they are. Kinda defeats the purpose of a throw down piece.

 

[zonly1]

WOW!
California chasing away tax revenue?

Image that in this hypocrisy.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Looks like California has found a way to stop their citizens from getting guns.

Requiring Gun makers to microstamp the cartridges when fired.

Smith and Wesson has already said they can't comply with the law and now Ruger is saying the same thing.

Ruger Firearms Being 'Forced' Out of California Due to Microstamping

On January 23rd, Breitbart News reported Smith & Wesson's plans to end most California gun sales due to the state's microstamping regulation. In so doing, we mentioned that Sturm, Ruger, & Co. had also announced that their guns would likely not be available in California either for the same reason.

Breitbart News spoke to Sturm, Ruger, & Co. on January 24th and they provided us with this statement "in response to our question about how the [microstamping] law in California will impact Ruger":


Ruger is committed to its customers in California. Unfortunately, the ill-conceived law requiring the incorporation of microstamping technology into semi-automatic pistols is forcing Ruger pistols off the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale in California. We are working hard to serve our customers in California and will do all we can to fight this draconian law. We continue to submit pistols to the independent test lab for testing and those pistols meet all the requirements of California in effect when those pistols first appeared on the Roster, i.e., everything except microstamping. We have been informed by the lab that the CA DDI will not even consider these "new" pistols for inclusion on the Roster unless they satisfy the microstamping regulations, which many numerous studies have found unworkable. Until microstamping is repealed, we expect that Ruger pistols--some of the safest available--will continue to be forced off the Roster.

Hopefully, these companies will "get smart" and move to gun friendly states like MAGPUL did. They told Colorado to go to hell and left - taking 25 million in tax revenue with them.

 

[Wildman]

Fuck Kalifornia.

i am with ya on that score,.., FUCK COMMIEFORNICATE ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

 

[Darkwind]

Why would anyone live in that fucked up state? We should pull everything out, give it to Mexico, put up a 20 foot iron fence and bus our illegals there.

Is it too late to sever Kalifornia from the mainland with explosives and scuttle it in deep water?

Why do people keep saying this or wanting to give up one of the most productive regions of our country?

The problem is NOT California, the problem is the liberals who infest it.

 

[Geaux4it]

 

[M14 Shooter]

gotta remember the intent of the law is to just plain get rid of guns period
and this won't stop until it's succeeded.

...and what the collectively stupid do not fathom is that CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS! Every time I see an argument for gun control I sigh in disbelief that so many still cling to the asinine idea that criminals will turn in or register their weapons. Just how stupid can people get?

Hmmmm........... I don't believe the idea is to get criminals to obey the law, but to provide a better way of identifying the weapons that are used in a crime. Of course, the NRA would find that offensive.

Thank you for continuing to prove the premise than anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I've always liked the idea of regulating ammunition, which isn't protected under the 2nd.

Yes.... just like words aren't protected under the 1st.
:roll: