California prosecutes man for posting anti muslim messages on facebook

California Prosecutes Man For Posting Anti-Muslim Messages On Facebook
California has leveled misdemeanor charges against 41-year-old Mark Feigin after he sent five anti-Muslim posts to the Islamic Center of Southern California’s (ICSC) Facebook page in 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

THIS IS AMERICA RETARDS WE WERE FREE TO SAY WE HATED WHO EVER, OR WHATEVER.....
CALIFORNIA YOU ANTIFA FKS ARE GETTING JUST WHAT YOU DESERVE STAY THERE FOREVER!


Don't get to full of yourselves about this Muslim or not because what you stupid fkrs don't get it what Cali. does spreads across the Country first off. Second off we were America we did not get arrested for posting our views like them or not third for the stupid fkrs who think this is funny and or say good...............Don't worry they're coming for your speech too dumbasses.

First they cam for the Jews and I did nothing........................................ cont. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me.

This violates free speech and cruel and unusual punishment in the federal Constitution.
 
Has it occurred to you that inforwars makes sure they aren't anything like MSM . They work very hard on not being leftist liberal lying news media like CNN, ABC, MSNBC, etc.........

2. Did it occur to you there are court documents i"ve posted where the information can't be twisted by news media.

did you bother to read the provided COURT documents.
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

The document you posted was the court's response to the defendant's motion to dismiss count #2. There are other charges against him.

You don't know that because you can't help but fall for InfoWars' bullshit of posting only the parts of a story they want you to know about.


No Fawn, there are not. You are just stupid and lying as always. You have no clue what the facts are, nor do you care. You are the mindless fuck you always are, rah rah democrats with no idea what it is you are praising.
Why do you blame me for your inability to comprehend the implication of entering a motion to dismiss count #2 implies there's a count #1? Maybe even more counts?

Judge-Judy-Shake-My-Head-Gif_zps66b02891.gif


Fawn, you're just flat out stupid. You stumble into a thread with no idea what is going on and start spouting moronic shit because you think it somehow serves your party.

Now go crawl back in the gutter. If at some later point I want your opinion, I'll fart.

The evidence seems to indicate that Feigin was, in fact, brought up on multiple charges. There have been other links, but I'll post some again.

L.A. man charged with making terrorist threats against Islamic Center
Man arrested in Islamic center threats had guns, ammo
Guns, Ammo Found At Home Of Man Accused Of Making Threats Against Islamic Center Of SoCal

You'll note that the name, Mark Feigin, is the same as the one from the OP article, as is the alleged target of the harassment/threats, the Islamic Center of Southern California. So, yes, it does appear that the man has multiple charges against him.


Great, what is the EXACT threat?
 
Again, the Colorado anti-Christianity laws are a direct urination on the 1st Amendment. These laws are directly aimed at Christians and have NOT been applied to Muslims.

No homosexual activists have targeted Halal bakeries in Colorado, nor would the Colorado courts impose fines on the protected Muslims. These are anti-Christianity laws.

However, that is NOT what this thread is about.

The facts are out now;

What the victim in California posted was;

  • “THE TERROR HIKE … SOUNDS LIKE FUN” (In reference to the Center’s advertised “Sunset Hike”)
  • “THE MORE MUSLIMS WE ALLOW INTO AMERICA THE MORE TERROR WE WILL SEE.”
  • “PRACTICING ISLAM CAN SLOW OR EVEN REVERSE THE PROCESS OF HUMAN EVOLUTION.”
  • “Islam is dangerous – fact: the more muslim savages we allow into america – the more terror we will see -this is a fact which is undeniable.”
  • “Filthy muslim shit has no place in western civilization.”
So, where is the "threat?"

California is persecuting people for holding opinions that the rulers don't like.

This is an act of war.
You were already shown an identical case in Michiganstan where the favored Muslims were let off for identical acts.

Last I checked, the 14th Amendment was still ratified.

Your posts suggest that you are absolutely out of your mind. The "California Caliphate"? The "Colorado Anti-Christianity Laws"? "Michiganstan"? Good grief, boy, you sound like some redneck in Oklahoma or Texas covered with tatoos, with guns and a pickup-truck hitting the meth, thinking that you believe in "God." Yeech. Everyone of whatever faith is required to follow the law, even you guys who think that you are so, so special. Feigin is 41 years old. He is old enough to know better.


Know better than what? State opinions that are contrary to the positions of the party? Know better than to insult Islam?

Now I apologize for this, I realize that the Constitution on you Maoists is like salt on a slug, but.

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

By criminalizing speech that opposes Islam, the California Caliphate has established Islam as the state religion.

Also note Comrade;

or abridging the freedom of speech

By outlawing speech that opposes the official state religion of Islam, California is clearly and obviously infringing the freedom of speech.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans have fought to defend the Constitution, I'll be damned if the Stalinist thugs in California will end it without a fight.

Tomorrow a judge will hear this case. If the case is thrown out with prejudice, then the job is to sue the holy fuck out of the Los Angeles police and the State for civil rights violations. I would also urge the US DOJ to launch a civil rights investigation into the conduct of this state where clearly the basic civil rights of citizens are denied.

If the judge upholds this, then the job is very different as California is no longer a legitimate government and is in fact engaged in civil war against the United States and against the citizens of the state.

We will give the law a chance to work, but if there is no law...

You truly are a nutjob. There is no "official state religion" of any faith, and never will be; not the current ridiculous version of "Christianity," not Heredi, not Wahabi, not anything. This is the United States of America, fool. What is being "criminalized" is harassment. Got get more meth.


Right, you openly praise the violation and utter end of the first amendment, driven no doubt by your psychopathic hatred of Donald Trump and anyone right of Joseph Stalin..

But I'm the nut job :eek:

Now tell me, Comrade shitferbrains, if it is illegal to criticize a certain faith, is that state recognition of that faith?

Are you so dumb that you don't understand that harassment and intimidation are not speech protected by the First Amendment and that no religion is protected by the law more than the others? There is no "state recognition" of a faith involved here even though this has occurred in other states in the deep south and mid-west that seem to have made crazy fundie "Christianity" into a state religion. It is not illegal to criticize any religion we want in a public forum such as this one. But there is no right to specifically bombard anyone's house of worship with threats, insults, and intimidation. Read the statute.

Show me the threat, you fucking scumbag?

Here are the exact words:

  • “THE TERROR HIKE … SOUNDS LIKE FUN” (In reference to the Center’s advertised “Sunset Hike”)
  • “THE MORE MUSLIMS WE ALLOW INTO AMERICA THE MORE TERROR WE WILL SEE.”
  • “PRACTICING ISLAM CAN SLOW OR EVEN REVERSE THE PROCESS OF HUMAN EVOLUTION.”
  • “Islam is dangerous – fact: the more muslim savages we allow into america – the more terror we will see -this is a fact which is undeniable.”
  • “Filthy muslim shit has no place in western civilization.”
Where do you see a threat, you Maoist pile of shit?
 
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

The document you posted was the court's response to the defendant's motion to dismiss count #2. There are other charges against him.

You don't know that because you can't help but fall for InfoWars' bullshit of posting only the parts of a story they want you to know about.


No Fawn, there are not. You are just stupid and lying as always. You have no clue what the facts are, nor do you care. You are the mindless fuck you always are, rah rah democrats with no idea what it is you are praising.
Why do you blame me for your inability to comprehend the implication of entering a motion to dismiss count #2 implies there's a count #1? Maybe even more counts?

Judge-Judy-Shake-My-Head-Gif_zps66b02891.gif


Fawn, you're just flat out stupid. You stumble into a thread with no idea what is going on and start spouting moronic shit because you think it somehow serves your party.

Now go crawl back in the gutter. If at some later point I want your opinion, I'll fart.

The evidence seems to indicate that Feigin was, in fact, brought up on multiple charges. There have been other links, but I'll post some again.

L.A. man charged with making terrorist threats against Islamic Center
Man arrested in Islamic center threats had guns, ammo
Guns, Ammo Found At Home Of Man Accused Of Making Threats Against Islamic Center Of SoCal

You'll note that the name, Mark Feigin, is the same as the one from the OP article, as is the alleged target of the harassment/threats, the Islamic Center of Southern California. So, yes, it does appear that the man has multiple charges against him.


Great, what is the EXACT threat?

If you're asking for the exact words he is alleged to have said, I have no idea. All the articles say is that he supposedly threatened to kill people at the Islamic center. Did Faun claim to know the exact words the man allegedly said? All I saw was Faun claiming there are multiple charges, and you replying that there are not.
 
[
Aww, you poor thing. Reality is such a bitch to you, huh?

Reality stupid fuck? Reality is that Feigin was arrested for offending Islam. The Saudi Style religious compliance police arrested and charged a man with failure to bow to Islam.

Otherwise, post the EXACT WORDS of the threat Feigin is charged with making?

Thank you for tearing that pos up for me LOL............. and you were right but morons won't ever live in reality LOL they can't.
 
Can you post a link to a news article about a Muslim in the U.S. threatening to kill Christians but not getting arrested for their threats?

Not exactly Muslim, no, but another religion has....heard of any arrests for this yet? No? Maybe the callers were using a payphone and couldn't be traced? Bet if the Christians were threatening the gays similarly, we'd have an arrest, prosecution with a maximum sentence and a civil award already in the bank accounts of the gay victims.

Supreme Court
Colorado baker: Death threats and hate for refusing to make gay wedding cake

Colorado baker: Death threats and hate for refusing to make gay wedding cake
He says he’s only received two actual death threats but he's also been told that he doesn't “deserve to live” and that “Christians should be thrown into the Roman Colosseum with lions."

One of those threats, Phillips said, came just a few weeks after he refused to bake the cake — long before the story garnered national attention. Then, a man called to say that he knew Phillips' daughter, Lisa, was working at the bakery. The man proceeded to give point-by-point driving directions to the cakeshop, where he would murder them.

If he didn’t report the threats, police have nothing to investigate. Police don’t investigate unreported threats made years earlier. In the case of the OP, the mosque reported threats and the police responded accordingly. Either find something comparable or tacitly admit you have nothing but butthurt whining.

You know, it doesn't say in the article whether or not the threats were reported outside the entire mainstream media.
Yes, that’s what I said. Nothing in the article indicates he reported the threats to the police. now if you have cases where police ignore threats, then you have an argument to make. I don’t see that here.


What threats, retard?

List them?
 
California Prosecutes Man For Posting Anti-Muslim Messages On Facebook
California has leveled misdemeanor charges against 41-year-old Mark Feigin after he sent five anti-Muslim posts to the Islamic Center of Southern California’s (ICSC) Facebook page in 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

THIS IS AMERICA RETARDS WE WERE FREE TO SAY WE HATED WHO EVER, OR WHATEVER.....
CALIFORNIA YOU ANTIFA FKS ARE GETTING JUST WHAT YOU DESERVE STAY THERE FOREVER!


Don't get to full of yourselves about this Muslim or not because what you stupid fkrs don't get it what Cali. does spreads across the Country first off. Second off we were America we did not get arrested for posting our views like them or not third for the stupid fkrs who think this is funny and or say good...............Don't worry they're coming for your speech too dumbasses.

First they cam for the Jews and I did nothing........................................ cont. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me.

Seems unconstitutional to me.
If it sounds unconstitutional to you, that’s only because you’re seeing the InfoWars version of events, not the actual version.

I read the State's response to the request to dismiss. Based upon the facts as stated by the State- it seems unconstitutional.

The accused posted 4 comments on a FB page- all of them vile- but not threatening. There is no indication that the poster was asked to stop posting and continued to post.

I hate this kind of crap but the owner of the FB page could have simply blocked the guy from posting on her page after the first comment. And posting 4 times doesn't seem to constitute harrasment to me.

And I really hate agreeing with anything on Infowars.....but based upon the source document- seems unconstitutional to me.
InfoWars doesn’t give the complete picture as they omit the main charge against him, threatening to kill someone. Adding the charge of a hate crime has been constitutionally tested and passed.

In re M.S. (1995)
I agree but....the fb portion of the charges is questionable imo.


There is no other portion.

This is persecution for opposing Islam.

The State of California is no different than the Saudi Religious police.

This is an act of war against the United States and against the citizens of California. The state is not a legitimate government and have neither legal nor moral authority.
 
California is SICK MENTALLY and fk over their own people and no this is NOT some PHOTO SHOPPED BS

26167401_1613110582117162_4875502540268802651_n.jpg
 
Seems unconstitutional to me.
If it sounds unconstitutional to you, that’s only because you’re seeing the InfoWars version of events, not the actual version.

I read the State's response to the request to dismiss. Based upon the facts as stated by the State- it seems unconstitutional.

The accused posted 4 comments on a FB page- all of them vile- but not threatening. There is no indication that the poster was asked to stop posting and continued to post.

I hate this kind of crap but the owner of the FB page could have simply blocked the guy from posting on her page after the first comment. And posting 4 times doesn't seem to constitute harrasment to me.

And I really hate agreeing with anything on Infowars.....but based upon the source document- seems unconstitutional to me.
InfoWars doesn’t give the complete picture as they omit the main charge against him, threatening to kill someone. Adding the charge of a hate crime has been constitutionally tested and passed.

In re M.S. (1995)
I agree but....the fb portion of the charges is questionable imo.


There is no other portion.

This is persecution for opposing Islam.

The State of California is no different than the Saudi Religious police.

This is an act of war against the United States and against the citizens of California. The state is not a legitimate government and have neither legal nor moral authority.

Do you think that the various news articles describing the multiple charges filed against Mark Feigin are all lies? You continue to post as though the charge from the OP is the only one Feigin has had made against him. Why are you so insistent this is the case?
 
Read the link he threatened to kill no one. So you are lying or you did not read the link?
There is more to the story then what is in the link. Unsurprisingly.
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
No, it’s like enforcing California law. You threaten to kill someone and you could find yourself facing formal charges.

Yeah, you posted something about anchor babies in a thread about a man being charged for threatening to kill Muslims.
Read the link he threatened to kill no one. So you are lying or you did not read the link?
There is more to the story then what is in the link. Unsurprisingly.
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
Coyote sees high comedy(her funny rating), I see emasculation, capitulation and cowardice.
It was worthy of laughter since this case has nothing to do with Sharia law and no one is making excuses for Islam.
Every time you do anything different to a Muslim than you would anyone else because of his/her religion is part of Sharia.

No not excuses, exceptions for Islam as it somehow deserves respect other religions see none of? It tells Islam it can go farther using our laws against us. But that has been obvious for a while.
 
There is more to the story then what is in the link. Unsurprisingly.
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
No, it’s like enforcing California law. You threaten to kill someone and you could find yourself facing formal charges.

Read the link he threatened to kill no one. So you are lying or you did not read the link?
There is more to the story then what is in the link. Unsurprisingly.
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
Coyote sees high comedy(her funny rating), I see emasculation, capitulation and cowardice.
It was worthy of laughter since this case has nothing to do with Sharia law and no one is making excuses for Islam.
Every time you do anything different to a Muslim than you would anyone else because of his/her religion is part of Sharia.

No not excuses, exceptions for Islam as it somehow deserves respect other religions see none of? It tells Islam it can go farther using our laws against us. But that has been obvious for a while.



California is SICK MENTALLY and fk over their own people and no this is NOT some PHOTO SHOPPED BS

26167401_1613110582117162_4875502540268802651_n.jpg

Did you just snap that pic yourself? :p


 
There is more to the story then what is in the link. Unsurprisingly.
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
No, it’s like enforcing California law. You threaten to kill someone and you could find yourself facing formal charges.

Read the link he threatened to kill no one. So you are lying or you did not read the link?
There is more to the story then what is in the link. Unsurprisingly.
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
Coyote sees high comedy(her funny rating), I see emasculation, capitulation and cowardice.
It was worthy of laughter since this case has nothing to do with Sharia law and no one is making excuses for Islam.
Every time you do anything different to a Muslim than you would anyone else because of his/her religion is part of Sharia.

No not excuses, exceptions for Islam as it somehow deserves respect other religions see none of? It tells Islam it can go farther using our laws against us. But that has been obvious for a while.


Take a moment to educate yourself ( won't even go into the fact you know nothing apparently of "Sharia").

This is case where California has laws regarding hate speech and regarding threats.

The Mosque is being treated exactly the same as a Church or a Synagogue had they been the recipient of such threats. In fact I pointed out cases where it was a Church and a Synagogue. A simple google will bring up many similar cases not involving a Mosque.

What I kind of wonder is - are you reacting this way because you believe that it's ok to do this to Mosques but not to Churches and Synagogues? :dunno:
 
Seems unconstitutional to me.
If it sounds unconstitutional to you, that’s only because you’re seeing the InfoWars version of events, not the actual version.

I read the State's response to the request to dismiss. Based upon the facts as stated by the State- it seems unconstitutional.

The accused posted 4 comments on a FB page- all of them vile- but not threatening. There is no indication that the poster was asked to stop posting and continued to post.

I hate this kind of crap but the owner of the FB page could have simply blocked the guy from posting on her page after the first comment. And posting 4 times doesn't seem to constitute harrasment to me.

And I really hate agreeing with anything on Infowars.....but based upon the source document- seems unconstitutional to me.
InfoWars doesn’t give the complete picture as they omit the main charge against him, threatening to kill someone. Adding the charge of a hate crime has been constitutionally tested and passed.

In re M.S. (1995)
I agree but....the fb portion of the charges is questionable imo.


There is no other portion.

This is persecution for opposing Islam.

The State of California is no different than the Saudi Religious police.

This is an act of war against the United States and against the citizens of California. The state is not a legitimate government and have neither legal nor moral authority.

That is listed as charge #2. As another poster already pointed - where is charge #1? (hint: the other portion).
 
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
No, it’s like enforcing California law. You threaten to kill someone and you could find yourself facing formal charges.

There is more to the story then what is in the link. Unsurprisingly.
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
Coyote sees high comedy(her funny rating), I see emasculation, capitulation and cowardice.
It was worthy of laughter since this case has nothing to do with Sharia law and no one is making excuses for Islam.
Every time you do anything different to a Muslim than you would anyone else because of his/her religion is part of Sharia.

No not excuses, exceptions for Islam as it somehow deserves respect other religions see none of? It tells Islam it can go farther using our laws against us. But that has been obvious for a while.



California is SICK MENTALLY and fk over their own people and no this is NOT some PHOTO SHOPPED BS

26167401_1613110582117162_4875502540268802651_n.jpg

Did you just snap that pic yourself? :p




That's a pretty clever prank, although I'd guess if whoever did it gets caught, it might be a misdemeanor charge.

Prank California highway signs 'welcome' felons, illegal immigrants and MS-13
 
No, it’s like enforcing California law. You threaten to kill someone and you could find yourself facing formal charges.

Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
Coyote sees high comedy(her funny rating), I see emasculation, capitulation and cowardice.
It was worthy of laughter since this case has nothing to do with Sharia law and no one is making excuses for Islam.
Every time you do anything different to a Muslim than you would anyone else because of his/her religion is part of Sharia.

No not excuses, exceptions for Islam as it somehow deserves respect other religions see none of? It tells Islam it can go farther using our laws against us. But that has been obvious for a while.



California is SICK MENTALLY and fk over their own people and no this is NOT some PHOTO SHOPPED BS

26167401_1613110582117162_4875502540268802651_n.jpg

Did you just snap that pic yourself? :p




That's a pretty clever prank, although I'd guess if whoever did it gets caught, it might be a misdemeanor charge.

Prank California highway signs 'welcome' felons, illegal immigrants and MS-13



WIthout even clicking on the link I bet that retard site SNOPES told you that...
 
Coyote sees high comedy(her funny rating), I see emasculation, capitulation and cowardice.
It was worthy of laughter since this case has nothing to do with Sharia law and no one is making excuses for Islam.
Every time you do anything different to a Muslim than you would anyone else because of his/her religion is part of Sharia.

No not excuses, exceptions for Islam as it somehow deserves respect other religions see none of? It tells Islam it can go farther using our laws against us. But that has been obvious for a while.



California is SICK MENTALLY and fk over their own people and no this is NOT some PHOTO SHOPPED BS

26167401_1613110582117162_4875502540268802651_n.jpg

Did you just snap that pic yourself? :p




That's a pretty clever prank, although I'd guess if whoever did it gets caught, it might be a misdemeanor charge.

Prank California highway signs 'welcome' felons, illegal immigrants and MS-13



WIthout even clicking on the link I bet that retard site SNOPES told you that...



Oh hell I was wrong, .......... A video is quite different from a photos............... though LMAO..
 
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
No, it’s like enforcing California law. You threaten to kill someone and you could find yourself facing formal charges.

There is more to the story then what is in the link. Unsurprisingly.
Bottom line, it is like enforcing Sharia. Unsurprisingly, you are here to make excuses for Islam.
Coyote sees high comedy(her funny rating), I see emasculation, capitulation and cowardice.
It was worthy of laughter since this case has nothing to do with Sharia law and no one is making excuses for Islam.
Every time you do anything different to a Muslim than you would anyone else because of his/her religion is part of Sharia.

No not excuses, exceptions for Islam as it somehow deserves respect other religions see none of? It tells Islam it can go farther using our laws against us. But that has been obvious for a while.


Take a moment to educate yourself ( won't even go into the fact you know nothing apparently of "Sharia").

This is case where California has laws regarding hate speech and regarding threats.

The Mosque is being treated exactly the same as a Church or a Synagogue had they been the recipient of such threats. In fact I pointed out cases where it was a Church and a Synagogue. A simple google will bring up many similar cases not involving a Mosque.

What I kind of wonder is - are you reacting this way because you believe that it's ok to do this to Mosques but not to Churches and Synagogues? :dunno:
I know enough about Sharia that I know it demands recognition of Islam everywhere and all the time. And letting people know who did it is not the same is why he did it, is it? Maybe a rhetorical question, but when are people going to be told why people object to Islam?
 

Forum List

Back
Top