Zone1 Calling/accusing other members "groomer"

[Coyote]

I don't know about that, but from where I'm standing I see the issue of protecting pedophiles from getting their feelings hurt.

What pedos are being protected?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Well. They certainly didn’t give a shit when I was being harassed with accusations of incest. So I’m not exactly surprised.

Been there done that

 

[Road Runner]

What about false allegations of pedo?

That's not illegal unless you tell the police about it. Lack of judgement and immoral if they truly aren't one, but nobody can actually do anything about it but get angry in that situation.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What pedos are being protected?

Your minions

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Exactly.

But it’s perfect okay to call posters they don’t like. Racist,White Supremicists,Homophobes,Nazi’s,terrorists,Taliban etc…

They love to lord over those who are smarter than they are, more articulate than they are, offer better arguments than they can and are far more knowledgeable than themselves.

For them, it is payback time. "We'll show 'em!!" They just love to hunt in packs.

 

[BlueGin]

We both know why

Yes I know exactly why. I just like reminding people of what they are dealing with on this board.

 

[BlueGin]

They love to lord over those who are smarter than they are, more articulate than they are, offer better arguments than they can and are far more knowledgeable than themselves.

For them, it is payback time. "We'll show 'em!!" They just love to hunt in packs.

That’s always been the case. Like I said off board palsies.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Well. They certainly didn’t give a shit when I was being harassed with accusations of incest. So I’m not exactly surprised.

They ENJOYED it.

That's how they run.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Your minions

Non answer.

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

Isn't that the same thing?

No. Replying to someone and saying "You are a groomer." is far different than replying and giving specifics. Example: "The information I read states that the material you want made available to children in public libraries is par for the course for groomers." Someone could also ask "Do you know the book you want kids to have access to contains pornographic images? How can you say you want a kid to see that?"

 

[Road Runner]

What pedos are being protected?

You're going to let me tell you now? Well you asked so you can't do much about it in response. One of them I suspect to be in this thread. Actually two if you count Zinc. But the two others I'm highly suspicious of are Tommy and the something patriot. He always talks about the sexualization of children.

 

[Zincwarrior]

They ENJOYED it.

That's how they run.

Again, why are you still here? If the board is so terrible, 4chan.is waiting

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Non answer.

Go away, noob

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Again, why are you still here? If the board is so terrible, 4chan.is waiting

Idiot

 

[Zincwarrior]

You're going to let me tell you now? Well you asked so you can't do much about it in response. One of them I suspect to be in this thread. Actually two if you count Zinc. But the two others I'm highly suspicious of are Tommy and the something patriot. He always talks about the sexualization of children.

Cite an instance buddy.

 

[Coyote]

Bullshit

If you don’t, that is on you. You only speak for yourself.

 

[BlueGin]

They ENJOYED it.

That's how they run.

Yep. Just like when they ignored a poster who verbally abused me about being the cause of a friends death ( ie they offed themselves for knowing me). These people aren’t exactly salt of the earth .

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Again, why are you still here? If the board is so terrible, 4chan.is waiting

You sure are trying to get rid of me.

Goodness -- object to showing kids illustrations of child sex and you are totally triggered!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Cite an instance buddy.

Idiot

Stop the reactions noob. I'm serious

 

[Road Runner]

Cite an instance buddy.

This thread. Why do you think that children reading pornographic material is acceptable?