otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,402
- 10,993
- 1,315
Perfectly explains maga today.
Professional victims
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Perfectly explains maga today.
Gullible Democrat LOLPerfectly explains maga today.
Professional victims
Hilarious that you can't even explain your graph.Gullible Democrat LOL
Hilarious that you don't understand what's going on are so gullible. LOLHilarious that you can't even explain your graph.
You haven't explained what was going on fuckup.Hilarious that you don't understand what's going on are so gullible. LOL
I have explained to you fuckup, it's a statistical impossibility for the voting to have gone the way of the graph. It's not my problem if you don't or can't get it. Your stupidity is not my fault. The graph is a symbol of your dishonesty.You haven't explained what was going on fuckup.
So, use your words and explain.
How is it statistically impossible.I have explained to you fuckup, it's a statistical impossibility for the voting to have gone the way of the graph. It's not my problem if you don't or can't get it. Your stupidity is not my fault. The graph is a symbol of your dishonesty.
You are such a fuckup, gullible Democrat. The graph represents a voting curve that couldn't possibly exist, we're talking about 170,000 votes for Biden and none for Trump. That would happen only in the mind of a simpleton.How is it statistically impossible.
Fuckup hilarious fingerYou are such a fuckup, gullible Democrat. The graph represents a voting curve that couldn't possibly exist, we're talking about 170,000 votes for Biden and none for Trump. That would happen only in the mind of a simpleton.
CORTES: The Statistical Case Against Biden’s Win - The National Pulse
Statistics continue to cast real doubt on the probability of a President Trump loss in the election.The statistical case is, admittedly, circumstantial rather than conclusive.But the numbers also firmly point to the intense improbability of the accuracy of the present Biden lead. The statistical...thenationalpulse.com
No they didn’t.Government agencies interfered with the social media.
No he didn’t.Biden lied and the MSM let him get away with it.
No they weren’t.Unbelievable amounts of votes counted in the middle of the night.
No they weren’t.Fraudulent votes counted.
No such thingsIllegal drop boxes.
Never happened.Illegal changes in voting laws.
Don’t talk about your offspring.2000 mules.
306>232Youve been fooled
Bombshells undercut the 'Big Lie:' 21 confirmed illegalities, irregularities from 2020 election
There are now nearly two dozen credible confirmations of wrongdoing, irregularities and illegalities that undercut the claims of bureaucrats, journalists and Democrats that the November 2020 general election was flawless.justthenews.com
Look it up moron I'm not going to do all your work for you. You go around calling everybody fuckups when you are the biggest one of all. Perfect example of projection.Fuckup hilarious finger
Where in the offered article does it state 170,000 to zero?
It appears to be a rigged election, for the gullibleNo they didn’t.
No he didn’t.
No they weren’t.
No they weren’t.
No such things
Never happened.
Don’t talk about your offspring.
306>232
Certified
Blisterfinger Cried
Buried you ASS DIDN'T IYou are one dumb fuck LOL. How do you manage?
US Election 2020: Biden seeks to clarify remark on ending oil
The Democrat says he meant fossil fuel subsidies, as Mr Trump claims it was a serious gaffe.www.bbc.com
Every one of your points is incorrect.No they didn’t.
No he didn’t.
No they weren’t.
No they weren’t.
No such things
Never happened.
Don’t talk about your offspring.
306>232
Certified
Blisterfinger Cried
Lie LolololololNo he didn’t.
How's that fuckhead. By proving me right?Buried you ASS DIDN'T I
Gullible Democrat LOL
The blister is the biggest joke there is here. We all laugh at his comedy.You are such a fuckup, gullible Democrat. The graph represents a voting curve that couldn't possibly exist, we're talking about 170,000 votes for Biden and none for Trump. That would happen only in the mind of a simpleton.
CORTES: The Statistical Case Against Biden’s Win - The National Pulse
Statistics continue to cast real doubt on the probability of a President Trump loss in the election.The statistical case is, admittedly, circumstantial rather than conclusive.But the numbers also firmly point to the intense improbability of the accuracy of the present Biden lead. The statistical...thenationalpulse.com
Its an Op/Ed loser boy.Looks increasingly like it was a rigged election
Buried Your ass didn't I, you are like picking on a third grader, lets talk about something important!How's that fuckhead. By proving me right?
Yet Biden remains in the White House, your blob remains in court.It appears to be a rigged election, for the gullible