Procrustes Stretched
Dante's Manifesto
Okay Liability the Moocher.I know the Dainty doesn’t understand this, but he has successfully quoted one of the problems with the Bragg legal theory of the case. Amazing.
It may be true (for instance) that in NY, in a burglary case, a prosecutor isn’t required to state which crime a defendant “intended to commit” inside a home he has illegally entered. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that he isn’t obligated to state the alleged “other” crime in a case alleging “falsification of business records.”
And there are clear legal dangers inherent in declining to do so for the persecutor.
Yeah. It does happen. Shitbag witnesses do get “flipped” from time to time. But it is still kind of unusual for the shitbag witness to have been convicted of perjury relative to the very matters he is going to be asked at trial in the present case.
So what? It doesn’t matter what some alleged legal experts think. It matters what the appellate courts may have to say in the event of a conviction.
Want to make a bet?