Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone who read Unkotare would say, Yup, little Marxist doggie is a hater.
Unkotare, the little Marxist doggie, says only Marxists hate, somewhere above. Thus, . . .
No one is saying it out loud, but it's gonna happen.
Do you really expect to be taken seriously when you post nonsense like that?
He does exhibit, however, the hypocrisy typical of many on the right: where he claims to advocate less government yet approves of government interfering in our most personal of affairs, and disallowing the citizen to follow his conscience in good faith concerning subjective moral issues, such as abortion.
He does exhibit, however, the hypocrisy typical of many on the right: where he claims to advocate less government yet approves of government interfering in our most personal of affairs, and disallowing the citizen to follow his conscience in good faith concerning subjective moral issues, such as abortion.
There is no hypocrisy involved at all. And moral issues that necessarily involve the life and death of innocent human beings are not merely personal and subjective.
You silly goof far righties simply can't handle you are reasons for our loss this time.
There is no "our" as far as you are concerned, Fakey.
No one is saying it out loud, but it's gonna happen.
Do you really expect to be taken seriously when you post nonsense like that?
Um, yeah, I do by sensible people on this issue.
You silly goof far righties simply can't handle you are reasons for our loss this time.
There is no "our" as far as you are concerned, Fakey.
dude shut up, you are not going to do anything about it.
I do think abortions should be safe and rare... because it's never an easy decision.
But you don't get there by banning them. In the Philippines, abortion is illegal, but 800,000 abortions are performed every year. More per capita than we have in the United States.
Meanwhile in France, the government pays for the abortions, but they also pay for the medical, family leave, and even send government workers around to help new mothers with chores. (DAMNED SOCIALISTS!!!!) France has half the number of abortions per capita that we have in the US.
Meanwhile, in France...
Certainly a major part of a woman's decision, to have an abortion, is financial. The self reliant right wants all woman to make a moral decision, then face the financial challenge on her own. It is easier and cheaper to outlaw abortion. No tax dollars spent that way. No abortions stopped either. There is always the possibility of prosecution to look forward to. I can see the allure, no tax dollars spent, and prosecuting those that dare make the wrong choice. I don't see why woman didn't go for that. Does the right really want to stop abortions or do they want to voice their morality.
He does exhibit, however, the hypocrisy typical of many on the right: where he claims to advocate ‘less government’ yet approves of government interfering in our most personal of affairs, and disallowing the citizen to follow his conscience in good faith concerning subjective ‘moral’ issues, such as abortion.
There is no hypocrisy involved at all. And moral issues that necessarily involve the life and death of innocent human beings are not merely personal and subjective.
He does exhibit, however, the hypocrisy typical of many on the right: where he claims to advocate less government yet approves of government interfering in our most personal of affairs, and disallowing the citizen to follow his conscience in good faith concerning subjective moral issues, such as abortion.
There is no hypocrisy involved at all. And moral issues that necessarily involve the life and death of innocent human beings are not merely personal and subjective.
No, that happens to be YOUR opinion. The opinion of someone who will never be in that situation.
When you have a uterus and an unwanted pregnancy that is going to ruin your entire life, you can get back to me.
The GOP has always sold the bitter pill of Plutocracy with a coating of racism, homophobia and misogyny, none of which anyone will tolerate anymore.
There is no hypocrisy involved at all. And moral issues that necessarily involve the life and death of innocent human beings are not merely personal and subjective.
No, that happens to be YOUR opinion. The opinion of someone who will never be in that situation.
When you have a uterus and an unwanted pregnancy that is going to ruin your entire life, you can get back to me.
You are not only deliberately and nihilistically immoral, but you are an illogical dunce. You need to update your handbook of liberal responses, because "you don't have a uterus!" is a ridiculously failed 'argument.'
He does exhibit, however, the hypocrisy typical of many on the right: where he claims to advocate less government yet approves of government interfering in our most personal of affairs, and disallowing the citizen to follow his conscience in good faith concerning subjective moral issues, such as abortion.
There is no hypocrisy involved at all. And moral issues that necessarily involve the life and death of innocent human beings are not merely personal and subjective.
[
You are not only deliberately and nihilistically immoral, but you are an illogical dunce. You need to update your handbook of liberal responses, because "you don't have a uterus!" is a ridiculously failed 'argument.'
The GOP has always sold the bitter pill of Plutocracy with a coating of racism, homophobia and misogyny, none of which anyone will tolerate anymore.
Don't kid yourself, clown. The democrats have always had at least as much "racism, homophobia and misogyny" as anyone.
There is no "our" as far as you are concerned, Fakey.
dude shut up, you are not going to do anything about it.
Where did I mention "doing anything about it"? Go stick your nose somewhere else if you're too stupid to follow along, "dude."
He does exhibit, however, the hypocrisy typical of many on the right: where he claims to advocate less government yet approves of government interfering in our most personal of affairs, and disallowing the citizen to follow his conscience in good faith concerning subjective moral issues, such as abortion.
There is no hypocrisy involved at all. And moral issues that necessarily involve the life and death of innocent human beings are not merely personal and subjective.
Of course its hypocritical you either abide by a doctrine of less and limited government or you dont.
And if one abides by a doctrine of less and limited government, he does so with the understanding that follow Americans are going to believe in and do things he disagrees with, and will respect those actions and beliefs, even if he considers them immoral.
There is no "our" as far as you are concerned, Fakey.
dude shut up, you are not going to do anything about it.
Where did I mention "doing anything about it"? Go stick your nose somewhere else if you're too stupid to follow along, "dude."
The GOP has always sold the bitter pill of Plutocracy with a coating of racism, homophobia and misogyny, none of which anyone will tolerate anymore.
Don't kid yourself, clown. The democrats have always had at least as much "racism, homophobia and misogyny" as anyone.
The GOP has always sold the bitter pill of Plutocracy with a coating of racism, homophobia and misogyny, none of which anyone will tolerate anymore.
Don't kid yourself, clown. The democrats have always had at least as much "racism, homophobia and misogyny" as anyone.
The only difference is unlike the republican party, the democratic social policy has kept current with the times.
