🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Canadian woman hit with $950K medical bill after unexpectedly giving birth in US hospital

ClosedCaption

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2010
53,233
6,719
Canadian woman hit with 950K medical bill after unexpectedly giving birth in US hospital



She had been at the hospital for about a week when her insurance carrier, Blue Cross, notified her that her coverage was denied due to a pre-existing condition – a bladder infection she’d had during the fourth month of her pregnancy.

Huculak-Kimmel said her specialist had examined her prior to the trip with an ultrasound, and the physician determined her pregnancy was stable.

“He saw no reason for me not to go,” she said.

She told the Blue Cross salesperson about the bladder infection when she bought her travel policy, and the representative said she was fine to travel because she was less than 36 weeks pregnant.

“I guess we thought we had done everything right,” she said.

A medical expert told CBC that he believes the treatment should have been covered if Huculak-Kimmel was cleared by her physician, who sent a letter to Blue Cross.

“I don’t think we can be our own doctors,” Steven Lewis, a health policy analyst in Saskatoon. “Either we do, or we don’t have a pre-existing condition — and we’re not likely to know about them unless we’ve been told by our doctors that we have them.”

Huculak-Kimmel spent six weeks on bed rest at the hospital, and she was told that her daughter would require a lengthy stay in the neonatal intensive care unit – if she survived.

That cost up to $15,000 per day, and she spent about $30,000 renting a condominium and car during her daughter’s two-month hospital stay.
 
Sounds like a lawsuit. She had travel insurance which might be different than the health care coverage that covers everything.
 
The story sounds like bullshit. 36 weeks is 9 months. She was OKed to travel because she was less than 9 months pregnant? What happens at 10 months? Travel insurance covers all medical costs? have to see the policy. And does her policy cover care in another country?
 
It's Blue Cross, I'm shocked. Does anyone know how many lawsuits for fraud and antitrust these guys have had in the last 10 years?
 
And meanwhile, invaders from the south come here in swarms and squat and drop at the nearest hospital costing American taxpayers millions of dollars every year, and Obama and liberals want to reward them with citizenship !!!!!
 
The story sounds like bullshit. 36 weeks is 9 months. She was OKed to travel because she was less than 9 months pregnant? What happens at 10 months? Travel insurance covers all medical costs? have to see the policy. And does her policy cover care in another country?

It said she was less than 36 weeks pregnant. Full term is 40 weeks. 36 weeks is less than 9 months. If she bought a travel policy to travel to another country, why owuld it not be good in the country she bought it for? You make no sense.
 
And meanwhile, invaders from the south come here in swarms and squat and drop at the nearest hospital costing American taxpayers millions of dollars every year, and Obama and liberals want to reward them with citizenship !!!!!

Republican business owners need low pay employees.
 
It's Blue Cross, I'm shocked. Does anyone know how many lawsuits for fraud and antitrust these guys have had in the last 10 years?

Anthem BC dropped me when I moved from Colorado to Ohio, after they told me that I would be able to purchase a plan very similar to what I had in Colorado. I told them about my pre-existing condition and they assured me that I would be able to purchase similar coverage at a similar price. Yea, bullshit. They dropped me like a hot potato. That is the main reason I support the ACA, despite some of the problems with it. These insurance companies would drop anyone they could if they could find even the smallest thing that might get them out of having to pay for someone's care. They might as well have said "we only insure healthy people until they get sick. After becoming sick, you no longer qualify."
 
I thought Canadians were covered by national healthcare.

She spent 2 months in the hospital, the "unexpectedly gave birth" is a retarded headline.

It sounds like she bought a separate policy that expired.

You can't fix stupid.
 
I thought Canadians were covered by national healthcare.

She spent 2 months in the hospital, the "unexpectedly gave birth" is a retarded headline.

It sounds like she bought a separate policy that expired.

You can't fix stupid.

Apparently, you respond without actually reading the story. She was traveling to the US. Canada does not cover any healthcare costs incurred when the person is not in Canada, therefore when traveling outside of Canada, an individual needs to purchase travel health insurance so that should they have to go to medical care, they are covered. After she ended up in the hospital, the insurance company decided that she had a pre-existing condition that disqualified her from coverage, even though they had already approved the sale of the policy.
 
It's Blue Cross, I'm shocked. Does anyone know how many lawsuits for fraud and antitrust these guys have had in the last 10 years?

Anthem BC dropped me when I moved from Colorado to Ohio, after they told me that I would be able to purchase a plan very similar to what I had in Colorado. I told them about my pre-existing condition and they assured me that I would be able to purchase similar coverage at a similar price. Yea, bullshit. They dropped me like a hot potato. That is the main reason I support the ACA, despite some of the problems with it. These insurance companies would drop anyone they could if they could find even the smallest thing that might get them out of having to pay for someone's care. They might as well have said "we only insure healthy people until they get sick. After becoming sick, you no longer qualify."

They're currently being sued by the State of California.
 
I thought Canadians were covered by national healthcare.

She spent 2 months in the hospital, the "unexpectedly gave birth" is a retarded headline.

It sounds like she bought a separate policy that expired.

You can't fix stupid.

Apparently, you respond without actually reading the story. She was traveling to the US. Canada does not cover any healthcare costs incurred when the person is not in Canada, therefore when traveling outside of Canada, an individual needs to purchase travel health insurance so that should they have to go to medical care, they are covered. After she ended up in the hospital, the insurance company decided that she had a pre-existing condition that disqualified her from coverage, even though they had already approved the sale of the policy.
I couldn't find anything about Canadian health coverage in the story.

Regardless, according to this link, her travel insurance had expired.

Jennifer Huculak-Kimmel billed 950K US after giving birth in U.S. - Saskatoon - CBC News
 
The only newsworthy aspect of this story is the astronomical amount of the bill, a product of the U.S. health insurance system (including Obamacare).
 
The only newsworthy aspect of this story is the astronomical amount of the bill, a product of the U.S. health insurance system (including Obamacare).

Another RW who STILL does not understand that ObamaCare is not a product that one buys.
 

Forum List

Back
Top