Can't take anymore of this global warming.

[WTH_Progs?]

Gore was right, the left was right, we must save ourselves from this global catastrophe we've created for us.

You can really see the impact of our demise in this chart. The Sierras may see the 2nd or 3rd most snow since they began recording this in 1946.

Save us.

 

[pyetro]

Gore was right, the left was right, we must save ourselves from this global catastrophe we've created for us.

You can really see the impact of our demise in this chart. The Sierras may see the 2nd or 3rd most snow since they began recording this in 1946.

Save us.

View attachment 764271

A sierra isn't a planet.

 

[pyetro]

Gore was right, the left was right, we must save ourselves from this global catastrophe we've created for us.

You can really see the impact of our demise in this chart. The Sierras may see the 2nd or 3rd most snow since they began recording this in 1946.

Save us.

View attachment 764271

Let's play "pick your region":

Southeast Michigan, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Flint, Saginaw just had top 10 warmest winter

If you thought it was a mild winter, you were correct.

www.mlive.com

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Let's play "pick your region":

Southeast Michigan, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Flint, Saginaw just had top 10 warmest winter

If you thought it was a mild winter, you were correct.

www.mlive.com

And they'll see some of the coldest in the future. Leftwiches lie.

 

[pyetro]

And they'll see some of the coldest in the future. Leftwiches lie.

You made that up.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

You made that up.

Sure as fuck didn't. Your brain simply doesn't work. Say, why do you have a BS avatar about Trump eyeing a 10 year old.........

Only to support Biden who creeps on young children he's never met evidenced by video?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Let's play "pick your region":

Southeast Michigan, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Flint, Saginaw just had top 10 warmest winter

If you thought it was a mild winter, you were correct.

www.mlive.com

Well WTF do you think the envirokooks do when they make their case FOR global warming?

It snowed a little bit today. Long range forecast says we will stay 5 to 10 degrees below normal for the next several weeks. Tonight they are predicting snow that could knock out power in several locations.

 

[zaangalewa]

Gore was right, the left was right, we must save ourselves from this global catastrophe we've created for us.

You can really see the impact of our demise in this chart. The Sierras may see the 2nd or 3rd most snow since they began recording this in 1946.

Save us.

View attachment 764271

 

[fncceo]

If I lived in The Sierras, I would pray for global warming every day... either that, or move to Palm Springs.

 

[zaangalewa]

Well WTF do you think the envirokooks do when they make their case FOR global warming?

It snowed a little bit today. Long range forecast says we will stay 5 to 10 degrees below normal for the next several weeks. Tonight they are predicting snow that could knock out power in several locations.

-----

Warum sollte man den Ergebnissen von Klimamodellen vertrauen?​

Das Vertrauen in Klimamodelle basiert auf deren physikalischen Grundlagen und der Fähigkeit, das beobachtete ⁠Klima⁠ sowie Klimaänderungen der Vergangenheit abzubilden.

Klimamodelle basieren auf anerkannten physikalischen Gesetzen, wie der Erhaltung von Masse, Energie und Impuls. Sie sind in der Lage, grundlegende Züge des aktuellen Klimas wiederzugeben. Das belegen Vergleiche mit Beobachtungsdaten. In den vergangenen Jahren fand im Rahmen organisierter Multi-Modell-Vergleiche eine äußerst umfangreiche Prüfung und Bewertung von Klimamodellen statt. Die Modelle zeigen beachtliche Erfolge bei der Darstellung wichtiger Eigenschaften des Klimas. Dazu gehören die großflächige Verteilung der Lufttemperatur, des Niederschlags, der Strahlung und des Windes sowie der Meerestemperaturen, der Meeresströmungen und der Meereisbedeckung. Darüber hinaus geben Modelle wesentliche Aspekte der ⁠Klimavariabilität⁠ wieder. Beispiele hierfür sind der Vorstoß und der Rückzug der großen Monsunsysteme oder saisonale Verschiebungen der Temperatur, der Zugbahnen der Stürme und der Regengürtel. Diese Fähigkeit von Klimamodellen steigert unser Vertrauen darin, dass sie die grundlegenden physikalischen Prozesse abbilden, die für die Simulation zukünftiger Klimaänderungen wichtig sind.

Ein weiterer Grund für das Vertrauen in Klimamodelle beruht auf der Fähigkeit der Modelle, vergangene Klimaänderungen zu reproduzieren. Die Modelle wurden zur Simulation historischer Klimazustände eingesetzt, z.B. des warmen Mittelholozäns vor 6.000 Jahren oder des letzten glazialen Maximums (Höhepunkt der letzten Vereisung) vor 21.000 Jahren. Sie können viele Merkmale wie das Ausmaß und das großräumige Muster der Abkühlung der Ozeane während der letzten Eiszeit reproduzieren (im Rahmen der Unsicherheiten bei der Rekonstruktion vergangener Klimazustände).

Auch der globale Temperaturtrend des vergangenen Jahrhunderts, für das Beobachtungsdaten vorliegen, wird von den Modellen gut nachgebildet. Es gelingt, sowohl die stärkere Erwärmung der Arktis, als auch die kurzfristige, weltweite Abkühlung nach großen Vulkanausbrüchen zu simulieren.
Die Klimamodelle werden dahingehend ausgebaut, dass sie immer mehr physikalische Prozesse und Wechselwirkungen innerhalb des Klimasystems abbilden. Beispielsweise hat die Wissenschaft unlängst die Reaktion von Pflanzen, die biologischen und chemischen Wechselwirkungen im Ozean und die Dynamik von Eisschilden in globale Klimamodelle mit einbezogen. Durch die ständige Weiterentwicklung der Rechentechnik und zunehmende Rechenleistungen von Großrechnern kann die räumliche Auflösung der Modelle weiter erhöht werden. Dadurch werden auch kleinräumigere Prozesse wie extreme Wetterereignisse besser darstellbar.

Fazit: Das Vertrauen in Klimamodelle basiert auf deren physikalischen Grundlagen und der Fähigkeit, das beobachtete Klima sowie Klimaänderungen der Vergangenheit abzubilden. Defizite bestehen zweifellos. Jedoch lieferten Klimamodelle über mehrere Jahrzehnte der Modellentwicklung durchgängig ein robustes und eindeutiges Bild einer signifikanten Klimaerwärmung als Reaktion auf zunehmende Treibhausgaskonzentrationen

-----

Why should the results of climate models be trusted?

Trust in climate models is based on their physical foundations and ability to represent observed climate as well as past climate changes.

Climate models are based on accepted physical laws, such as the conservation of mass, energy, and momentum. They are able to reproduce basic features of the current climate. This is proven by comparisons with observational data. In recent years, extremely extensive testing and evaluation of climate models has taken place in the context of organized multi-model comparisons. The models show considerable success in representing important features of the climate. These include large-scale distributions of air temperature, precipitation, radiation, and wind, as well as ocean temperatures, ocean currents, and sea ice cover. In addition, models reproduce key aspects of climate variability. Examples include the advance and retreat of major monsoon systems or seasonal shifts in temperature, storm tracks, and rain belts. This ability of climate models increases our confidence that they represent the fundamental physical processes that are important for simulating future climate change.

Another reason for confidence in climate models is based on the models' ability to reproduce past climate changes. The models have been used to simulate historical climate states, such as the warm mid-Holocene 6,000 years ago or the last glacial maximum (peak of the last glaciation) 21,000 years ago. They can reproduce many features such as the extent and large-scale pattern of ocean cooling during the last glacial period (within the uncertainties of reconstructing past climate states).

The global temperature trend over the past century, for which observational data are available, is also well reproduced by the models. They succeed in simulating both the stronger warming of the Arctic and the short-term global cooling following large volcanic eruptions.
Climate models are being upgraded to reflect more and more physical processes and interactions within the climate system. For example, scientists have recently incorporated plant responses, biological and chemical interactions in the ocean, and ice sheet dynamics into global climate models. Continued advancements in computing technology and increasing computational power of mainframe computers can further increase the spatial resolution of models. This also makes it easier to represent smaller-scale processes such as extreme weather events.

Conclusion: The confidence in climate models is based on their physical fundamentals and the ability to represent the observed climate as well as climate changes of the past. Deficiencies undoubtedly exist. However, over several decades of model development, climate models have consistently provided a robust and unambiguous picture of significant climate warming in response to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

-----

Source: Häufige Fragen zum Klimawandel

 

[zaangalewa]

If I lived in The Sierras, I would pray for global warming every day... either that, or move to Palm Springs.

Did you ever try to speak with god about your problem why you sometimes tell others a damned bullshit which you do not believe on your own?