Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #241
You wouldn't care if someone was a surrogate to an infertile straight couple, its only child trafficking if they are going to gays right?
That depends on the situation and if there's a guardian ad litem in the process. The child would have both a mother and a father. So right off the start the situation is more healthy than if they were going to a gay home. There needs to be someone interceding for children in surrogacy. This cannot be a "cash for child" situation without oversight. Surely you can see a problem with that and what do you know? They're already being sold into homes where they will have no mother forever. What a sentence to hang around a child's developmental mind!...you know...for money..
No one is being sold in regards to surrogacy.
Just all an invention of your sad homophobic mind.
Let's see...
1. Money changes hands..."as compensation"... and
2. A child's custody is transferred as a result into a situation known and predictable to cause their harm (being deprived systematically of a mother for life)
3. Without a guardian ad litem involved.
Money changes hands, child sold to detriment, no oversight involved.
How is this not child trafficking?