BolshevikHunter
Rookie
- Banned
- #1,241
I believe neither. I think the DT was left w/o a defense, and they convinced ICA that this was her best bet. Let's face it folks, ICA doesn't have much solid ground from which to launch a legit defense. That doesn't make her guilty, but it does show intent to deceive.
oldsalt, I 100% agree bro. What other option did they really have? If I take a step outside of my own feelings, if I were a Defense attorney, I think the accidental drowning was the only logical direction to go in. Now that I know that they had a pool, I am suprised they waited until the beggining of the trial to use this tactic. However, I think the false accusations (in my opinion) against her father was a very big mistake in regards to Males on the Jury. It sounds like a desperate attempt for sympathy. ~BH
I didn't like GA or Cindy prior to the start of the trial, don't like them any more now. GA thrown under the bus gained ICA nothing. IMHO, she is the only one that can keep her neck out of the noose, and even that is questionable at this point, due to her lying.
oldsalt, Sorry bro. Trying to eat dinner and get back to respond. Do you think it was an accident by Ethanol, or intentional? ~BH