- Thread starter
- Banned
- #1,201
Guilt is a verdict that is returned by a jury. Why do you feel the need to execute a person who has not been found guilty by a jury? Just curious.![]()
With the evidence, or lack thereof, so far....she's guilty. My opinion. Which I am entitled to. If you want to think her sweet and innocent, by all means knock yourself out thinking that.
Please post where I have said anyone, even you, is 'sweet and innocent.'
And BTW: You don't know me, nor do you know what I believe. This is a discussion board, and I am discussing. When one goes to law school he/she is taught to argue BOTH sides. FERVENTLY. Get over yourself already~ You are becoming a bore.
Psssssssst. It's called the IGNORE button if another poster begins to bore you.
My opinion is opposite of yours. I have watched this trial since it began. I was on the fence. I am no longer. Guilty. Accidental or deliberate, she is still guilty of lying while that child rotted. She knew from day one. Either by her hand deliberately or by accident. Doesn't change my stance. GUILTY. She won't be put to death, but she will wind up on death row. Good. I want her there. Sitting all by her lonesome except with other wackos just like her. And all her real or make believe friends partying their brains out as she stares at four walls.
Don't like my opinon? Don't read them.