Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[San Souci]

" Freak Farmer Fanatics Calling Severe Congenital Defects Miracles And Demanding Others Suffer "

* Anthropocentric Psychotics Swear Plastic Dolls Are Sentient *

How many deformed baby dolls are in your collection , or do you not want deformed baby dolls ?

This moniker is an abortion choice us republican , whom understands that #dobbs is sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments , along with malfeasance against title 1 section 8 of us code , and that scotus should be charged with the crime .

The term " right " in your question is idiocy and slang , though it is consistent with the idiocy and slang in your use of term " babies " - Applying THe Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction .

Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?

" Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ? " * Environmentalism Advocates Getting Ugly About Apex Predator Gluttony * An anthropocentric psychosis may be characterized as anthropocentrism which has become dysfunctional . *...

www.usmessageboard.com

All Dobbs did is Defer Baby Murder to the STATES where it belongs. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that permits baby murder. Of course ,people were more civilized back then. They did not murder their babies for convenience. And women rarely went whoring around as they do today.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Of course ,people were more civilized back then. They did not murder their babies for convenience.

Back when? Jews long believed the sanctity of life begins at the start of birth. Are you saying juice were never civilized?

 

[initforme]

All Dobbs did is Defer Baby Murder to the STATES where it belongs. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that permits baby murder. Of course ,people were more civilized back then. They did not murder their babies for convenience. And women rarely went whoring around as they do today.

Nobody loses when the majority of voters decide. This is what you wanted no?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Not Enumerated But Self Evident For Dummies "

* Arrest Warrant For Sedition Against Scotus For Dobbs Is Valid Against Banter For Dumbfounded Arrogance *

All Dobbs did is Defer Baby Murder to the STATES where it belongs.

The dobbs decision reviled the us citizen and independence of the individual , as do the traitors to us republic who support its dumbfounded sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments and malfeasance against title 1 section 8 of us code .

* Deceived From Equitable Doctrine And Informed Consent Of Us Republic *

There is NOTHING in the Constitution that permits baby murder.

There is everything in us constitution that stipulates equal protection with a citizen , and us 14th amendment stipulates a single non incidental requirement of live birth to become a citizen and therefore live birth is required for equal protection with a us citizen .

By a live birth requirement to become a us citizen from us 14th , states are prohibited in us 10th amendment from proscribing abortion , that is states are prohibited from providing equal protection with a citizen for any prior to a live birth .

Outside of a roe v wade conclusion that an ability for a fetus to survive an imminent live birth at natural viability , the only other conclusion is that a constitutional amendment is required , however traitors against us constitution decided to embrace formal and unlawful sedition .

The anti-federalism claims are a red herring to embrace statistism , as traitors to principles of us republic to establish independence of the individual and its autonomy for self ownership and self determination .

The abortion anti-choice continues to play as stupid as it is able , that is until the free press overwhelms censure of the fee press , and the abortion choice leadership and jurisprudence at large are negligent and incompetent in articulating the actual basis for roe v wade as given by the " logically , of course " statement from blackmun that was not even introduced in dobbs .

Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is In A State Of Sedition Because Of Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion

" Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is Under Sedition By States As A Result Of US Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion " * Constitutional Originalism Versus Judicial Activism * Blackmun wrote this - ' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on...

www.usmessageboard.com

Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...

www.usmessageboard.com

* Brain Washing Rinse And Repeat *

Of course ,people were more civilized back then. They did not murder their babies for convenience. And women rarely went whoring around as they do today.

Stop confusing the literal meaning of an after life , which is genetic perpetuity , and the metaphorical means by which to achieve it .

From the principles of individualism and those of us republic , the individual us citizen determines progeny and not fake us republicans - traitors against us republic and pandering as democrats for populism and democracy as tyranny by collective majority .

The principles of non violence stipulate that violence is illegitimate aggression and self defense against violence is legitimate aggression .

The principles of individualism stipulate that individuals are entitled to self ownership , as free roam , as free association and as progeny , and individuals are entitled to self determination , as to retain private property and as exercise of willful intents to enter into social contracts made valid through informed consent .

A law exists because there is an entity capable of issuing a retort for a violation of some precept .

Prior to entering into a social civil contract according to a constitution , individuals are subject to the moral relativism within nature and to improve ones chances for survival and for quality of life , individuals exchange natural freedoms for rites that are protected by retort .

Anything that can be alienated is not inalienable , and a subjective altruism is a perspective that ones introspection should exist in perpetuity , however nature of gawd does not expect that every instance of introspection must exist in perpetuity so satisfy the subjective altruism .

The motto of e pluribus unum for us republic expects independence of the individual , with equal protection of negative liberties among individuals , whether an individual is a citizen , or a collective state , or a federate , or a corporate .

 

[San Souci]

Nobody loses when the majority of voters decide. This is what you wanted no?

Yes. The Voters of Each STATE decide. That is how it should be. Personally ,I think it is murder. As a Citizen , I believe it is up to the Voters in Each State. ROE was an example of the Judiciary making LAW. It had to be overturned.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

The Voters of Each STATE decide. That is how it should be. Personally ,I think it is murder.

They decide that the government gets to ban or approve a medical procedure that fundamentalist Christian’s of the white Republican with an Absolute Biblical worldview variety believe is evil.

We are not supposed to have a Biblical Worldview being imposed on a state’s obligation to regulate medical facilities and doctors.

So why are voters deciding any transactions between a pregnant women and her doctor when there is only religious objection to it?

 

[dblack]

They decide that the government gets to ban or approve a medical procedure that fundamentalist Christian’s of the white Republican with an Absolute Biblical worldview variety believe is evil.

We are not supposed to have a Biblical Worldview being imposed on a state’s obligation to regulate medical facilities and doctors.

So why are voters deciding any transactions between a pregnant women and her doctor when there is only religious objection to it?

For what it's worth, Jews consider human life to begin at..... wait for it ..... birth! Crazy talk, eh?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

I believe it is up to the Voters in Each State.

why not let it be up to a woman to decide in the universe, What is the harm in that?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Of course ,people were more civilized back then. They did not murder their babies for convenience.

Second Request;

Back when? Jews long believed the sanctity of life begins at the start of birth. Are you saying Jews were never civilized?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Opinions vary on the matter, but even a pro-choice individual has to define when life should legally begin.

Or they can accept one of the world’s great and ancient religions as an acceptable answer:

Of course ,people were more civilized back then.

Jews long believed the sanctity of life begins at the start of birth.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

There is NOTHING in the Constitution that permits baby murder

There is nothing in the Constitution that forbids a woman from terminating her own pregnancy.

 

[candycorn]

Is this a lock? I don’t know. But I’m so psyched to think that the ruling allowing slaughter of innocent life — sanctioned by the United States — is about to end.

Well, so much for that theory...

https://www.npr.org/2024/06/24/g-s1-5876/up-first-newsletter-two-years-after-dobbs-militants-attack-in-russia

 

[NotfooledbyW]

What is a person? 240623 {post•319}
progressive hunter said: are you for abortion or against it?? prgrssvhntr 240623 V319

That is a question a pregnant woman should be able ask herself with a safe and legal option if she decides giving birth to a child is not in her plan. The public has absolutely no reason to answer your question.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

What is a person? 240623 {post•319}
progressive hunter said: are you for abortion or against it?? prgrssvhntr 240623 V319

That is a question a pregnant woman should be able ask herself with a safe and legal option if she decides giving birth to a child is not in her plan. The public has absolutely no reason to answer your question.

Still tilting at those windmills I see...If ya ever decide to do yourself a favor and change your screen name I have one you should consider:

Hiroo Onoda, he lived in his own world fighting a fight for decades where he never knew victory and the world viewed him as both a humorous and sad curiosity...carry on​