HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Under Illinois' new concealed carry law, I believe this Veteran would have been arrested.
Man that sucks!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Under Illinois' new concealed carry law, I believe this Veteran would have been arrested.
Under Illinois' new concealed carry law, I believe this Veteran would have been arrested.
Under Illinois' new concealed carry law, I believe this Veteran would have been arrested.
They don't allow you to defend yourself or others?
Under Illinois' new concealed carry law, I believe this Veteran would have been arrested.
They don't allow you to defend yourself or others?
The way it was explained by the instructor- if there is no immediate direct threat to you personally then you pretty much mind your own business.
For example, if somebody is shooting up a bank full of people you can't waltz in and stop it. You CAN attempt to get the shooter's attention and once a threat is directed toward you - fire away. You can't shoot someone breaking into your home unless there is a direct threat to you or your family personally. And of course, a shot to the back is a big no-no.
I suppose I could read the entire law (and I should), but of course I'm relying on the instructor here.
They don't allow you to defend yourself or others?
The way it was explained by the instructor- if there is no immediate direct threat to you personally then you pretty much mind your own business.
For example, if somebody is shooting up a bank full of people you can't waltz in and stop it. You CAN attempt to get the shooter's attention and once a threat is directed toward you - fire away. You can't shoot someone breaking into your home unless there is a direct threat to you or your family personally. And of course, a shot to the back is a big no-no.
I suppose I could read the entire law (and I should), but of course I'm relying on the instructor here.
You did not hear your instructor correctly, or he is an idiot. You can use deadly force to save the lives of others, not just your own life.
Since when is robbery a capital offense? Sounds like the war veteran needed better judgement. But if he was capable of that then he wouldn't have gone to whatever useless war the US has fought in the last 60 years.
The way it was explained by the instructor- if there is no immediate direct threat to you personally then you pretty much mind your own business.
For example, if somebody is shooting up a bank full of people you can't waltz in and stop it. You CAN attempt to get the shooter's attention and once a threat is directed toward you - fire away. You can't shoot someone breaking into your home unless there is a direct threat to you or your family personally. And of course, a shot to the back is a big no-no.
I suppose I could read the entire law (and I should), but of course I'm relying on the instructor here.
You did not hear your instructor correctly, or he is an idiot. You can use deadly force to save the lives of others, not just your own life.
Are you an Illinois resident and that familiar with the law? If so, I appreciate the heads up.![]()
“Deadly force” means “force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm.” When you’re defending yourself or someone else, deadly force is OK only if you reasonably believe it’s necessary “to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm” to yourself or another.
When you’re defending yourself or someone else, or stopping that “trespass on or criminal interference with” other property, deadly force is also OK to prevent “the commission of a forcible felony.”
They don't allow you to defend yourself or others?
The way it was explained by the instructor- if there is no immediate direct threat to you personally then you pretty much mind your own business.
For example, if somebody is shooting up a bank full of people you can't waltz in and stop it. You CAN attempt to get the shooter's attention and once a threat is directed toward you - fire away. You can't shoot someone breaking into your home unless there is a direct threat to you or your family personally. And of course, a shot to the back is a big no-no.
I suppose I could read the entire law (and I should), but of course I'm relying on the instructor here.
You did not hear your instructor correctly, or he is an idiot. You can use deadly force to save the lives of others, not just your own life.
The way it was explained by the instructor- if there is no immediate direct threat to you personally then you pretty much mind your own business.
For example, if somebody is shooting up a bank full of people you can't waltz in and stop it. You CAN attempt to get the shooter's attention and once a threat is directed toward you - fire away. You can't shoot someone breaking into your home unless there is a direct threat to you or your family personally. And of course, a shot to the back is a big no-no.
I suppose I could read the entire law (and I should), but of course I'm relying on the instructor here.
You did not hear your instructor correctly, or he is an idiot. You can use deadly force to save the lives of others, not just your own life.
By damnies, according to this - that is correct...
(720 ILCS 5/7-1) (from Ch. 38, par. 7-1)
Sec. 7-1. Use of force in defense of person.
(a) A person is justified in the use of force against another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or another against such other's imminent use of unlawful force. However, he is justified in the use of force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm only if he reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or another, or the commission of a forcible felony.
720*ILCS*5/*Criminal Code of 2012.
The robbery was not what got the robber killed. I just said that. It was self-defense because the robber aimed at the vet. The vet defended himself. My point is that this stupid idea that thieves should be executed on the spot is entirely psychotic.
Since when does robbery carry a death sentence?
Did the robbers kill anyone? No? It was justifiable homicide in that the robber raised his gun first. That's self-defense, but robbery is not a capital offense.
You're a really sick person if you think that stealing should carry a death sentence.
Does that death sentence for stealing count for international bankers as well?
Since when is robbery a capital offense? Sounds like the war veteran needed better judgement. But if he was capable of that then he wouldn't have gone to whatever useless war the US has fought in the last 60 years.
Since when does robbery carry a death sentence?
It doesn't. I don't care what you are doing. You point a gun at me you are done.
For those of you who say bad guys with guns are never stopped by good guys with guns, here's one to consider.
War veteran shoots and kills alleged game store robber
War veteran shoots and kills alleged game store robber | News - Home
One less bad guy in the world.