CBO: Trump budget would create 720 billion deficit

So now progs suddenly care about the debt, after Big Ears doubled it and they were silent.

HYPOCRISY!!!
 
Not happy about it at all. We should be eliminating many Fed agencies, cutting off all foreign aid, and cut all welfare to able bodied men and women.
We'll see what Congress passes.

I'd love to see a Democrat proposal that reduces the deficit.
 
Not happy about it at all. We should be eliminating many Fed agencies, cutting off all foreign aid, and cut all welfare to able bodied men and women.
We'll see what Congress passes.

I'd love to see a Democrat proposal that reduces the deficit.
You forgot the big one. Cutting the military in half.
 
CBO: Trump's budget doesn't balance federal ledger

Now, as usual, USMB cons will call this "fake news" because ANY criticism of Trump fits that description in their tiny minds, but because they won't be able to come up with a non-partisan source that disputes the claim, the rest of us will ignore them as always.
because they won't be able to come up with a non-partisan source that disputes the [CBO's findings]

You should add that they'll also resort to "shooting the messenger."

The upshot is that when one has no sound rebuttal or refutation for a claim and resorts to any of the forms of ad hominem responses/argumentation, one unequivocally announces to the world that one has no better case to present, for if one had a better case, one would make it.

As an aside, I have to say I have no respect for individuals who implement ad hominem lines of argumentation. I don't because it's clear that when that is the best one has to offer to discredit an assertion, one knows one has no sounder argument. One has to know that by invoking an ad hominem line, one impugns one's overall credibility and reputation. It is thus outright absurd, when all one has is the ad hominem attack, to do anything other than concede defeat on that matter and move on to a new topic. Now, that's actually so of any use to unsound lines, but it's most egregiously so for the ad hominem because of its personal nature. The irony issuing from users attacking via ad hominem rebuttals is dwarfed by little else.

For that reason, I don't generally bother to respond to such remarks. Why should I? Doing so serves only to give the person a chance to redeem themselves, and why would I want to do that when I'm engaged in discursive opposition to them?
 
Last edited:
Not happy about it at all. We should be eliminating many Fed agencies, cutting off all foreign aid, and cut all welfare to able bodied men and women.
We'll see what Congress passes.

I'd love to see a Democrat proposal that reduces the deficit.
The deficit was reduced by 2/3 under Obama.
 
So now progs suddenly care about the debt, after Big Ears doubled it and they were silent.

HYPOCRISY!!!
Do you not understand the difference between the debt and the deficit? You should because Obama's budget reduced the deficit by 2/3.
 
So now progs suddenly care about the debt, after Big Ears doubled it and they were silent.

HYPOCRISY!!!
Do you not understand the difference between the debt and the deficit? You should because Obama's budget reduced the deficit by 2/3.

Yeah, first he ballooned it by a billion percent and then cut that.

Ridiculously dishonest.
 
So now progs suddenly care about the debt, after Big Ears doubled it and they were silent.

HYPOCRISY!!!
Do you not understand the difference between the debt and the deficit? You should because Obama's budget reduced the deficit by 2/3.

Yeah, first he ballooned it by a billion percent and then cut that.

Ridiculously dishonest.
Um no actually. Bush ballooned it.
 
So now progs suddenly care about the debt, after Big Ears doubled it and they were silent.

HYPOCRISY!!!
Do you not understand the difference between the debt and the deficit? You should because Obama's budget reduced the deficit by 2/3.

Yeah, first he ballooned it by a billion percent and then cut that.

Ridiculously dishonest.
Um no actually. Bush ballooned it.

Stupid and irrelevant ramblings.

usgs_line.php


I believe everyone can see the problem/truth here. But keep blaming BOOOOOSH.
 
So now progs suddenly care about the debt, after Big Ears doubled it and they were silent.

HYPOCRISY!!!
Do you not understand the difference between the debt and the deficit? You should because Obama's budget reduced the deficit by 2/3.

Yeah, first he ballooned it by a billion percent and then cut that.

Ridiculously dishonest.
Um no actually. Bush ballooned it.

Stupid and irrelevant ramblings.

usgs_line.php


I believe everyone can see the problem/truth here. But keep blaming BOOOOOSH.
The Bush admin did pass the 2009 budget, duh..
 
So now progs suddenly care about the debt, after Big Ears doubled it and they were silent.

HYPOCRISY!!!
Do you not understand the difference between the debt and the deficit? You should because Obama's budget reduced the deficit by 2/3.

Yeah, first he ballooned it by a billion percent and then cut that.

Ridiculously dishonest.
Um no actually. Bush ballooned it.

Stupid and irrelevant ramblings.

usgs_line.php


I believe everyone can see the problem/truth here. But keep blaming BOOOOOSH.
The Bush admin did pass the 2009 budget, duh..

Pretty sure it was Obama who decided to throw 800 billion into air.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 - Wikipedia
 
Do you not understand the difference between the debt and the deficit? You should because Obama's budget reduced the deficit by 2/3.

Yeah, first he ballooned it by a billion percent and then cut that.

Ridiculously dishonest.
Um no actually. Bush ballooned it.

Stupid and irrelevant ramblings.

usgs_line.php


I believe everyone can see the problem/truth here. But keep blaming BOOOOOSH.
The Bush admin did pass the 2009 budget, duh..

Pretty sure it was Obama who decided to throw 800 billion into air.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 - Wikipedia
And Bush had TARP..
 
Yeah, first he ballooned it by a billion percent and then cut that.

Ridiculously dishonest.
Um no actually. Bush ballooned it.

Stupid and irrelevant ramblings.

usgs_line.php


I believe everyone can see the problem/truth here. But keep blaming BOOOOOSH.
The Bush admin did pass the 2009 budget, duh..

Pretty sure it was Obama who decided to throw 800 billion into air.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 - Wikipedia
And Bush had TARP..

I am not defending Bush. But trying to claim that Obama wasn't the king of spending and deficits is simply ludicrous.
 
Last edited:
CBO: Trump's budget doesn't balance federal ledger

Now, as usual, USMB cons will call this "fake news" because ANY criticism of Trump fits that description in their tiny minds, but because they won't be able to come up with a non-partisan source that disputes the claim, the rest of us will ignore them as always.


The CBO couldn't accurately forecast a government budget if their lives depended on it.....
 
So now progs suddenly care about the debt, after Big Ears doubled it and they were silent.

HYPOCRISY!!!
Do you not understand the difference between the debt and the deficit? You should because Obama's budget reduced the deficit by 2/3.

Yeah, first he ballooned it by a billion percent and then cut that.

Ridiculously dishonest.
Um no actually. Bush ballooned it.

Stupid and irrelevant ramblings.

usgs_line.php


I believe everyone can see the problem/truth here. But keep blaming BOOOOOSH.
How does this matter? How great must your president be if your only argument is that the others didn´t better? And if he goes out and shoots somebody will you show up with a graph telling how common such an action actually is?
Trump promised to reduce the debts. He planned to reduce it to zero within 8 years. 20 Trillion. He must begin on day one.
 
Not happy about it at all. We should be eliminating many Fed agencies, cutting off all foreign aid, and cut all welfare to able bodied men and women.
We'll see what Congress passes.

Except you can do all those things, and you wouldn't put a dent in the budget.

Most of the budget is Defense and Middle Class entitlements. (Or as i like to call them, "White People Welfare")
 
Not happy about it at all. We should be eliminating many Fed agencies, cutting off all foreign aid, and cut all welfare to able bodied men and women.
We'll see what Congress passes.

Except you can do all those things, and you wouldn't put a dent in the budget.

Most of the budget is Defense and Middle Class entitlements. (Or as i like to call them, "White People Welfare")
SOCIALISM?
 
So now progs suddenly care about the debt, after Big Ears doubled it and they were silent.

HYPOCRISY!!!
Do you not understand the difference between the debt and the deficit? You should because Obama's budget reduced the deficit by 2/3.
I don't think you understand what debt and deficit are.

Your Messiah DOUBLED the national debt and you are proud of it. Now if Trump doubles it again you need to STFU about it, since you said nothing when your Messiah did it.
 
Not happy about it at all. We should be eliminating many Fed agencies, cutting off all foreign aid, and cut all welfare to able bodied men and women.
We'll see what Congress passes.

Except you can do all those things, and you wouldn't put a dent in the budget.

Most of the budget is Defense and Middle Class entitlements. (Or as i like to call them, "White People Welfare")
Yeah...cause we all know non-whites don't use Welfare.

Joey just admit it. You are CRAZY!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top