Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,200
LOLOLOr the prosecution might point out that the driver drove his car directly into a crowd of people without appearing to slow or otherwise attempt to avoid hitting any of them.
I don't think that the argument, "The driver didn't try to run over these people, so he must not have been trying to run over those people" is going to be effective.
The driver rear-ended a car blocking his escape path. For anyone not a prejudiced shithead, that won't remove reasonable doubt that he was trying to hurt people, rather than flee. Only a real shithead, that's you, fucktard, find it compelling to believe that he intended to hurt people by proxy of another car, rather than smashing into those soft targets directly.
Even according to you -- his escape route takes him through a mob of people when an actual escape route, behind him, had no one in the street. And according to you, he chooses the route so full of pedestrians, he can't even see the car stopped in the middle of the road
Do you have any idea at all how stupid you sound?