Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The key phrase in your post is "two loving parents". Nearly 50% of the children living in poverty are in single parent homes. Their chance of dropping out of school is 150% greater than a child living in a two parent home. They are less likely to growup healthy and far more likely to be convinced of a crime.As someone who grew up in poverty, I suggest people replace their occasional emotional reactions with a cold hard FEARLESS look at the actual causes of poverty.
I grew up poor. We had 6 kids in a 2 bedroom house. No hot water and a toilet that did not flush. I never once growing up think of us as poor. We had a roof over our head. Food in our belly and two parents that loved us. When you compared to what we had and the kids in Africa we had it good. We in America is all about entitlements . What we can get for free . I believe if you work hard you will get what you need and more.
I know little of Michelle Obama's childhood obesity program and I'm not that interested. However, I am interest in seeing that kids are adequately fed before attending class. From first hand experience, I can tell you hungry kids don't learn and create class disturbances. It's a waste of money trying to educate them. We spend from about $50 to $100 a day to educate a child. Spending a little over $2 a day to provide a meal to a low income kid is a bargain. We don't need free lunch programs but we need free lunches for kids that can't afford it, otherwise we just as well shut down schools in impoverished areas because the kids aren't going to learn a damn thing.The cost of the school free and reduced lunch and breakfast program for the nation is 9.8 billion dollars a year which is a bargain considering the results. We spend about 7 billion a month in Afghanistan, and IMHO accomplish a lot less. None the less, there are many from right would like to see the program abolished.
a bargain? and you forget to add the 4.5 billion over 4 years from michelle obamas prgm.
if this is a 'bargain' why are the indicators going in the opposite direction? I have posted it before, are you aware of the child hood obesity rate 40 years ago, and now? after the 9.8 billion a year which of course has been ratcheted up as those the number has creeped higher every year?
is your feeling really that since we spend money on iraq and afghan we should just throw away any benchmarks for effective spending and an effective prgm.?![]()
In today's economy, "working hard" is no longer enough. As seen in the video, "working hard" is frequently no longer an option.
I hate to admit my age but I was in elementary school when the first free lunch program was introduced. It was both good and bad. Prior to the program, the poor kids who didn't have lunch money or a lunch just didn't eat. They could get a free lunch by telling cafeteria workers they didn't have any money. Damn few kids would do this and expose themselves to the ridicule from other kids. Most of these kids just skip school if they didn't have lunch money. No one really cared because they were considered the bad kids that were going drop out of school.I know little of Michelle Obama's childhood obesity program and I'm not that interested. However, I am interest in seeing that kids are adequately fed before attending class. From first hand experience, I can tell you hungry kids don't learn and create class disturbances. It's a waste of money trying to educate them. We spend from about $50 to $100 a day to educate a child. Spending a little over $2 a day to provide a meal to a low income kid is a bargain. We don't need free lunch programs but we need free lunches for kids that can't afford it, otherwise we just as well shut down schools in impoverished areas because the kids aren't going to learn a damn thing.a bargain? and you forget to add the 4.5 billion over 4 years from michelle obamas prgm.
if this is a 'bargain' why are the indicators going in the opposite direction? I have posted it before, are you aware of the child hood obesity rate 40 years ago, and now? after the 9.8 billion a year which of course has been ratcheted up as those the number has creeped higher every year?
is your feeling really that since we spend money on iraq and afghan we should just throw away any benchmarks for effective spending and an effective prgm.?![]()
I agree 100%, HOWEVER, the whole notion of public education, is an antiquated , over managed system used as a pawn between the parties has had its day.
I see this as just part and parcel of the whole issue- this is not about the kids to coin the phrase I heard in waiting for superman, its about the adults and their 'territory' which introduces a sclerosis that puts an issue like this in lala land.
I have no issue feeding kids in school per se', I do have a problem with the management of a system where in we spend 10 billion a year as obesity rates, as this prgm. has gained funding and proliferated, rose from 7% to over 30%. I didn't tie to the 2 together, further as the breakfast lunch and now in some districts dinner prgms expand, this relieves those parents of even more responsibility its been my experience than when you remove responsibility for some, you get less of it.
these prgms go on auto pilot and they then suffer mission creep and here we are.
The key phrase in your post is "two loving parents". Nearly 50% of the children living in poverty are in single parent homes. Their chance of dropping out of school is 150% greater than a child living in a two parent home. They are less likely to growup healthy and far more likely to be convinced of a crime.As someone who grew up in poverty, I suggest people replace their occasional emotional reactions with a cold hard FEARLESS look at the actual causes of poverty.
I grew up poor. We had 6 kids in a 2 bedroom house. No hot water and a toilet that did not flush. I never once growing up think of us as poor. We had a roof over our head. Food in our belly and two parents that loved us. When you compared to what we had and the kids in Africa we had it good. We in America is all about entitlements . What we can get for free . I believe if you work hard you will get what you need and more.
If we want a better America, we going have to figure how to improve parenting. That is the key to our future.
Yep!The key phrase in your post is "two loving parents". Nearly 50% of the children living in poverty are in single parent homes. Their chance of dropping out of school is 150% greater than a child living in a two parent home. They are less likely to growup healthy and far more likely to be convinced of a crime.I grew up poor. We had 6 kids in a 2 bedroom house. No hot water and a toilet that did not flush. I never once growing up think of us as poor. We had a roof over our head. Food in our belly and two parents that loved us. When you compared to what we had and the kids in Africa we had it good. We in America is all about entitlements . What we can get for free . I believe if you work hard you will get what you need and more.
If we want a better America, we going have to figure how to improve parenting. That is the key to our future.
It would probably help if our welfare system didn't make it economically advantageous for a woman to raise children in a home without her kid's father.
Yep!The key phrase in your post is "two loving parents". Nearly 50% of the children living in poverty are in single parent homes. Their chance of dropping out of school is 150% greater than a child living in a two parent home. They are less likely to growup healthy and far more likely to be convinced of a crime.
If we want a better America, we going have to figure how to improve parenting. That is the key to our future.
It would probably help if our welfare system didn't make it economically advantageous for a woman to raise children in a home without her kid's father.
There's nothing "noble" about a woman raising 5 kids, from 5 different fathers, where the fathers don't contribute, or the mother has no idea who the fathers even are......And it's the sense of entitlement that liberals have bred that cause these women to be so damn irresponsible in their lives.....It's like, "oh well fuck it. If I get pregnant, so what?.......the government will foot the bill, so, stick that MOFO up in me and fuck me till the cows come home.....I ain't worried about it!"
No doubt about it!Yep!It would probably help if our welfare system didn't make it economically advantageous for a woman to raise children in a home without her kid's father.
There's nothing "noble" about a woman raising 5 kids, from 5 different fathers, where the fathers don't contribute, or the mother has no idea who the fathers even are......And it's the sense of entitlement that liberals have bred that cause these women to be so damn irresponsible in their lives.....It's like, "oh well fuck it. If I get pregnant, so what?.......the government will foot the bill, so, stick that MOFO up in me and fuck me till the cows come home.....I ain't worried about it!"
If you talk to these type of people you learn they consider the mothers as "Baby Mommas" They are not wives, fiancés or girlfriends. As long as it appears the father is unknown or absent these women cash in on the children from many government programs. The father remains anonymous to get out of paying child support.
How can anyone see this and not worry about what things are coming down to in America today.
Hunger & Poverty In America - YouTube
a. Forty-three percent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.
b. Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
c. Only 6 percent of poor households are overcrowded. More than two-thirds have more than two rooms per person.
d. The average poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor.)
e. Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.
f. Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.
g. Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
h. Eighty-nine percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and more than a third have an automatic dishwasher.
i. As a group, America's poor are far from being chronically undernourished. The average consumption of protein, vitamins, and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middle-class children and, in most cases, is well above recommended norms. Poor children actually consume more meat than do higher-income children and have average protein intakes 100 percent above recommended levels. Most poor children today are, in fact, supernourished and grow up to be, on average, one inch taller and 10 pounds heavier than the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in World War II.How Poor Are America's Poor? Examining the "Plague" of Poverty in America
I used to be surprised at how gullible folks like you were...then I saw that Barack Obama had been elected.
If the parents can only access oreos and mountain dew rather than fresh vegetables and fruits.Or from living in areas without access to nutritious food.
Or where parents don't give a shit what their kids eat...
Ever hear of a food desert? Neighborhoods where there are no grocery stores, only corner bodegas?
Real Christians recognize and try to help reduce poverty in America.
False Christians just ignore it and/or make sick jokes about it while trying to rationalize why it exists.
And how do we do that?The key phrase in your post is "two loving parents". Nearly 50% of the children living in poverty are in single parent homes. Their chance of dropping out of school is 150% greater than a child living in a two parent home. They are less likely to growup healthy and far more likely to be convinced of a crime.I grew up poor. We had 6 kids in a 2 bedroom house. No hot water and a toilet that did not flush. I never once growing up think of us as poor. We had a roof over our head. Food in our belly and two parents that loved us. When you compared to what we had and the kids in Africa we had it good. We in America is all about entitlements . What we can get for free . I believe if you work hard you will get what you need and more.
If we want a better America, we going have to figure how to improve parenting. That is the key to our future.
It would probably help if our welfare system didn't make it economically advantageous for a woman to raise children in a home without her kid's father.
And one of the main reasons the state can't collect child support is there is little or no incentive for the mother to help. The child support just lowers the amount of the welfare payments or goes to the state. In some states the mother can keep $50 of what's collected.Yep!It would probably help if our welfare system didn't make it economically advantageous for a woman to raise children in a home without her kid's father.
There's nothing "noble" about a woman raising 5 kids, from 5 different fathers, where the fathers don't contribute, or the mother has no idea who the fathers even are......And it's the sense of entitlement that liberals have bred that cause these women to be so damn irresponsible in their lives.....It's like, "oh well fuck it. If I get pregnant, so what?.......the government will foot the bill, so, stick that MOFO up in me and fuck me till the cows come home.....I ain't worried about it!"
If you talk to these type of people you learn they consider the mothers as "Baby Mommas" They are not wives, fiancés or girlfriends. As long as it appears the father is unknown or absent these women cash in on the children from many government programs. The father remains anonymous to get out of paying child support.