Christian Man Asks Thirteen Gay Bakeries To Bake Him Traditional Marriage Cake; Turned Down By All

[Luddly Neddite]

What kind of doofus wants a wedding cake with a hateful political slogan on it?

Sounds like the kind of moronic stunt that criminal O'Keefe tries to pull.

Well, there was the nutter who wanted his kid's name written on his b'day cake. The name was Adolf Hitler and the bakery refused.

Some want equal rights for some but not others.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Straights know gay is wrong, we are not confused delusionals like gays.

Polls after poll show a majority of American support gays having access to marriage.

If that was the case then why are liberal activist judges overturning the will of the voters (who voted against gay marriage) to make states accept gay marriage

The will of the people is irrelevant if it violates the Constitution . Still smarting over the Brown and Loving decisions?

Where in the Constitution does it mention gay marriage and morality?

It is wedged right next to the right to privacy and the right to bake a cake. Have you not read the Constitution lately?

um No! For example, the Constitution does not say it is against the law to rob a bank. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to murder your neighbor. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to sell or use drugs. It does not say anyone has to believe in God or be a Christian. It does not say anything about gay marriage, nor does the Bill of Rights.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Moral issues are covered by an individual’s conscience and religion and by laws passed by local or state communities. From the federal government’s perspective, moral issues are not addressed in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, and those issues are off limits to the federal government.

 

[Care4all]

What kind of doofus wants a wedding cake with a hateful political slogan on it?

Sounds like the kind of moronic stunt that criminal O'Keefe tries to pull.

it was him, in disguise without his pimp outfit on.... j/k

 

[mdk]

I can't speak for them, I can only speak for myself. By the way, the very same argument can be made about the right.

The difference is Liberal judges incorrectly overturn things going beyond what they can do.

You think everyone of those judges that rules against gay marriage bans are liberal? Oh brother.

I'm not your damn brother. My brother is an honorable Conservative not a piece of shit like you.

Is that all you got? Insults? Quite a shame you didn't learn anything from your brother.

It's not an insult to call a piece of shit like you a piece of shit. Shame you don't know the difference between an insult and character identification.

Trust me, I could careless what some foul mouthed goblin like you thinks of me.

 

[007]

Oh those wonderful double standards progtards love to live by...

..."DO AS WE SAY, NOT AS WE DO."

 

[Conservative65]

The difference is Liberal judges incorrectly overturn things going beyond what they can do.

You think everyone of those judges that rules against gay marriage bans are liberal? Oh brother.

I'm not your damn brother. My brother is an honorable Conservative not a piece of shit like you.

Is that all you got? Insults? Quite a shame you didn't learn anything from your brother.

It's not an insult to call a piece of shit like you a piece of shit. Shame you don't know the difference between an insult and character identification.

Trust me, I could careless what some foul mouthed goblin like you thinks of me.

I don't care what some piece of worthless shit like you has to say. I try not to think of you but when I take a dumb, people like you automatically come to mind.

By the way, referring to me as a goblin fits your defintion of being insulting. Unlike you, I don't care.

 

[Nosmo King]

Polls after poll show a majority of American support gays having access to marriage.

If that was the case then why are liberal activist judges overturning the will of the voters (who voted against gay marriage) to make states accept gay marriage

The will of the people is irrelevant if it violates the Constitution . Still smarting over the Brown and Loving decisions?

Where in the Constitution does it mention gay marriage and morality?

It is wedged right next to the right to privacy and the right to bake a cake. Have you not read the Constitution lately?

um No! For example, the Constitution does not say it is against the law to rob a bank. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to murder your neighbor. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to sell or use drugs. It does not say anyone has to believe in God or be a Christian. It does not say anything about gay marriage, nor does the Bill of Rights.

The constitution applies equally to all citizens. Marriage equality is a matter of access to contract law. Such access should never be infringed.

 

[007]

The will of the people is irrelevant if it violates the Constitution . Still smarting over the Brown and Loving decisions?

Unless it's a Liberal agenda idea then it's OK when it's done. What you're saying is we are a Republic when those on the right vote for something and a democracy when the left wants to do something. Hypocrites.

That is not what I am saying in the least but if it makes you feel better to rail against a position I've never taken then have at it mate.

It's what I said. Your statement was that the will of the people can't override the Constitution. I said you believe that until it's something that you believe fits the definition.

Bullshit. The will of the people is meaningless if it violates the Constitution. It was the will of the people, via their elected representatives, in DC to impose burdensome and idiotic restrictions on guns. It was justly found unconstitutional.

When the left goes against the will of the people, the justification is they are looking out for and know what's best for the rest of us.

Not really, more truthfully they're saying: "if you disagree with us, we will shut you up and MAKE you accept whatever we want."

 

[007]

If that was the case then why are liberal activist judges overturning the will of the voters (who voted against gay marriage) to make states accept gay marriage

The will of the people is irrelevant if it violates the Constitution . Still smarting over the Brown and Loving decisions?

Where in the Constitution does it mention gay marriage and morality?

It is wedged right next to the right to privacy and the right to bake a cake. Have you not read the Constitution lately?

um No! For example, the Constitution does not say it is against the law to rob a bank. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to murder your neighbor. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to sell or use drugs. It does not say anyone has to believe in God or be a Christian. It does not say anything about gay marriage, nor does the Bill of Rights.

The constitution applies equally to all citizens. Marriage equality is a matter of access to contract law. Such access should never be infringed.

Could you show me where in the constitution is says that PERVERTED BUTT FUCKING FAGGOTS have the right to BASTARDIZE TRADITIONAL CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE?

 

[Derideo_Te]

What kind of doofus wants a wedding cake with a hateful political slogan on it?

Sounds like the kind of moronic stunt that criminal O'Keefe tries to pull.

it was him, in disguise without his pimp outfit on.... j/k

 

[mdk]

You think everyone of those judges that rules against gay marriage bans are liberal? Oh brother.

I'm not your damn brother. My brother is an honorable Conservative not a piece of shit like you.

Is that all you got? Insults? Quite a shame you didn't learn anything from your brother.

It's not an insult to call a piece of shit like you a piece of shit. Shame you don't know the difference between an insult and character identification.

Trust me, I could careless what some foul mouthed goblin like you thinks of me.

I don't care what some piece of worthless shit like you has to say. I try not to think of you but when I take a dumb, people like you automatically come to mind.

By the way, referring to me as a goblin fits your defintion of being insulting. Unlike you, I don't care.

This is common a theme with you. When you can't craft a reasonable response to people you fly off the handle and start hurling insults instead.

It's not an insult to call a goblin like you a goblin. Shame you don't know the difference between an insult and character identification. lol

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Looks like Steve McFuckface didn't actually read the link he posted.

The dude didn't ask for "pro-traditional-marriage" cakes. He specifically asked them to write:

"gay marriage is wrong"

on the cakes.

That is a huge difference.

Now, just for a second, try to be reasonable and actually think about that.

Has anyone here ever, ever, ever gone to a wedding (I assume, a straight wedding) and seen on the wedding cake:

"gay marriage is wrong"

????

Hint: if you are straight, as most all of us are, and you are marrying, the last thing you are thinking about on your wedding day is "gay marriage is wrong". If you are, then something is seriously, and I mean, seriously wrong with you.


Not only that, the first shop the guy called was not even a gay bakery, it was a gay cookie shop, so the product he was asking for, they don't even sell. I mean, how stupid can you get? She even told the doofus TWICE that they don't make cakes. This is just rich. Maybe next time he could call a gay car battery shop and ask them to bake an "I hate gays" cake and see what response he gets.

I know this is a hot-button issue, but really, can't religious conservatives do better than this?

How do you think a black owned bakery would respond were that same guy to call and ask for a cake that says:

"KKK forever"?

I bet that that black bakery (if one even exists, I am not sure of that at all) would probably say no. That being said:

Just for the record, I don't think that "christian" bakeries should have to bake cakes for gay weddings. I think that gay people are also definitely going about this the wrong way. The free market should control here, and if those "christians" are so stupid as to let a good business opportunity go by them and they lose money or go out of business, well then, that's their problem. Yeshuah said to his followers that they are "in this world but not of this world", but nowhere did he say that Christians cannot do business with people who are not as they are. Gee, Christians, this is one helluva way to "witness" to people who are not as you would wish for them to be.

Not only that, I bet top dollar that gay people do not go into a "christian" bakery and ask for

"straight marriage is wrong"

to be put on their wedding cake.


Derideo_Te Mertex Pogo Wolfsister77 LoneLaugher Carla_Danger Nyvin AceRothstein BULLDOG Dana7360 Grandma jillian JoeB131 Luddly Neddite mdk Nosmo King Plasmaball rightwinger Science*Good Vandalshandle Wry Catcher Howey

Maybe you good folks might want to add some to this discussion. This could get fun.

Let the right-wing Umbragefest begin!!!

I am of course against the PA laws, BUT if a business advertises custom cakes, it doesn't matter what the customer wants o them, you are obliged to serve them.

Good post though

 

[2aguy]

Looks like Steve McFuckface didn't actually read the link he posted.

The dude didn't ask for "pro-traditional-marriage" cakes. He specifically asked them to write:

"gay marriage is wrong"

on the cakes.

That is a huge difference.

Now, just for a second, try to be reasonable and actually think about that.

Has anyone here ever, ever, ever gone to a wedding (I assume, a straight wedding) and seen on the wedding cake:

"gay marriage is wrong"

????

Hint: if you are straight, as most all of us are, and you are marrying, the last thing you are thinking about on your wedding day is "gay marriage is wrong". If you are, then something is seriously, and I mean, seriously wrong with you.


Not only that, the first shop the guy called was not even a gay bakery, it was a gay cookie shop, so the product he was asking for, they don't even sell. I mean, how stupid can you get? She even told the doofus TWICE that they don't make cakes. This is just rich. Maybe next time he could call a gay car battery shop and ask them to bake an "I hate gays" cake and see what response he gets.

I know this is a hot-button issue, but really, can't religious conservatives do better than this?

How do you think a black owned bakery would respond were that same guy to call and ask for a cake that says:

"KKK forever"?

I bet that that black bakery (if one even exists, I am not sure of that at all) would probably say no. That being said:

Just for the record, I don't think that "christian" bakeries should have to bake cakes for gay weddings. I think that gay people are also definitely going about this the wrong way. The free market should control here, and if those "christians" are so stupid as to let a good business opportunity go by them and they lose money or go out of business, well then, that's their problem. Yeshuah said to his followers that they are "in this world but not of this world", but nowhere did he say that Christians cannot do business with people who are not as they are. Gee, Christians, this is one helluva way to "witness" to people who are not as you would wish for them to be.

Not only that, I bet top dollar that gay people do not go into a "christian" bakery and ask for

"straight marriage is wrong"

to be put on their wedding cake.


Derideo_Te Mertex Pogo Wolfsister77 LoneLaugher Carla_Danger Nyvin AceRothstein BULLDOG Dana7360 Grandma jillian JoeB131 Luddly Neddite mdk Nosmo King Plasmaball rightwinger Science*Good Vandalshandle Wry Catcher Howey

Maybe you good folks might want to add some to this discussion. This could get fun.

Let the right-wing Umbragefest begin!!!

Sorry....apparently you cannot refuse to make cakes for anyone....so these bakeries need to be sued out of existence.....

 

[Derideo_Te]

The will of the people is irrelevant if it violates the Constitution . Still smarting over the Brown and Loving decisions?

Where in the Constitution does it mention gay marriage and morality?

It is wedged right next to the right to privacy and the right to bake a cake. Have you not read the Constitution lately?

um No! For example, the Constitution does not say it is against the law to rob a bank. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to murder your neighbor. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to sell or use drugs. It does not say anyone has to believe in God or be a Christian. It does not say anything about gay marriage, nor does the Bill of Rights.

The constitution applies equally to all citizens. Marriage equality is a matter of access to contract law. Such access should never be infringed.

Could you show me where in the constitution is says that PERVERTED BUTT FUCKING FAGGOTS have the right to BASTARDIZE TRADITIONAL CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE?

Holy matrimony as defined by the Christian church is not the same thing as the state defined contract of marriage between two consenting adults.

The church can refuse holy matrimony rites to whomever they want.

The secular state doesn't have the right to discriminate against Americans when it comes to civil marriage contracts.

 

[2aguy]

These cocksuckers are forcing the laws and courts to do things their way or they will out a lot of Republicans and Dems in red state areas.

So the Republicans cant or wont do anything to keep the majority on equal legal footing with all the leftwing butt-fuckers that demand they get favoritism.


Anyone with any honesty or common sense knows that 'Civil Rights' has been code for 'fucking over white men' for the last 40 years.

It's only been code for that demographic group of white losers who can't compete on a somewhat leveled playing field....

Aaahhh....the good ole' boys long for days gone by.

Why did you bring the democrat party into this discussion....?

 

[Nosmo King]

The will of the people is irrelevant if it violates the Constitution . Still smarting over the Brown and Loving decisions?

Where in the Constitution does it mention gay marriage and morality?

It is wedged right next to the right to privacy and the right to bake a cake. Have you not read the Constitution lately?

um No! For example, the Constitution does not say it is against the law to rob a bank. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to murder your neighbor. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to sell or use drugs. It does not say anyone has to believe in God or be a Christian. It does not say anything about gay marriage, nor does the Bill of Rights.

The constitution applies equally to all citizens. Marriage equality is a matter of access to contract law. Such access should never be infringed.

Could you show me where in the constitution is says that PERVERTED BUTT FUCKING FAGGOTS have the right to BASTARDIZE TRADITIONAL CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE?

Marriage is a contract in the eyes of the state. It is a contract that establishes a 'blood relationship' between two adults who do not already have such a relationship. The marriage contract brings with it certain benefits and protections not afforded to other contracts.

Two sober, committed, law abiding citizens who are of the age of majority should have access to these benefits and protections without jumping through the hoops some might impose.

There is not threat to the marriages of others. There is no threat to the institution of marriage.

Denying homosexuals these protections should, at least, show cause to why such freedoms should not be extended at least and that denial should be illegal at best.

Now, you specifically cited Christian marriage. Where in the constitution does it say Christian anything? Do you believe that those who are not Christians should be denied a marriage license as well?

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

What does our Constitution say? It says, via the Tenth Amendment, that the States and the People of those states should decide what they want to do about gay marriage without any interference from the federal government.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

You think everyone of those judges that rules against gay marriage bans are liberal? Oh brother.

I'm not your damn brother. My brother is an honorable Conservative not a piece of shit like you.

Is that all you got? Insults? Quite a shame you didn't learn anything from your brother.

It's not an insult to call a piece of shit like you a piece of shit. Shame you don't know the difference between an insult and character identification.

Trust me, I could careless what some foul mouthed goblin like you thinks of me.

I don't care what some piece of worthless shit like you has to say. I try not to think of you but when I take a dumb, people like you automatically come to mind.

By the way, referring to me as a goblin fits your defintion of being insulting. Unlike you, I don't care.

How often do you take a dumb bro?

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Where in the Constitution does it mention gay marriage and morality?

It is wedged right next to the right to privacy and the right to bake a cake. Have you not read the Constitution lately?

um No! For example, the Constitution does not say it is against the law to rob a bank. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to murder your neighbor. The Constitution does not say it is against the law to sell or use drugs. It does not say anyone has to believe in God or be a Christian. It does not say anything about gay marriage, nor does the Bill of Rights.

The constitution applies equally to all citizens. Marriage equality is a matter of access to contract law. Such access should never be infringed.

Could you show me where in the constitution is says that PERVERTED BUTT FUCKING FAGGOTS have the right to BASTARDIZE TRADITIONAL CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE?

Marriage is a contract in the eyes of the state. It is a contract that establishes a 'blood relationship' between two adults who do not already have such a relationship. The marriage contract brings with it certain benefits and protections not afforded to other contracts.

Two sober, committed, law abiding citizens who are of the age of majority should have access to these benefits and protections without jumping through the hoops some might impose.

There is not threat to the marriages of others. There is no threat to the institution of marriage.

Denying homosexuals these protections should, at least, show cause to why such freedoms should not be extended at least and that denial should be illegal at best.

Now, you specifically cited Christian marriage. Where in the constitution does it say Christian anything? Do you believe that those who are not Christians should be denied a marriage license as well?

off topic