- Apr 17, 2009
- 112,950
- 38,428
It amazes me though that you can not see the "the seditious, dangerously criminal, behavior that it is...behavior of the sort that should put people in jail...as it very much endangers the very foundations of our Republic" at the core of Trump and his cronies and their work with the Russians.
That's OK -- because I and most other Americans haven't seen the proof of any of that "dangerous, seditious , ciminal behavior" either. You SURE you want to double down on that after Trump blew up a joint airbase in Syria and THIS week approved sending critical armaments to the Ukraine? After the previous Admin diddled on that for years?Seems like most of earlier talking points about Ukraine planks in the Repub platform and being weak on Russia have been thoroughly torched..
It's certainly NOT in the GPS/Steele version of the Dossier. And virtually NO ONE knows what was in the earlier Wash Beacon version.
But I DID predict that Jill Stein had more obvious and credible "collusion" with the Russians and a better motive and relationship with them. And NOW -- people on Capitol Hill are looking into that.
Jill Stein looped into widening investigation of Russia and Trump Jr. connections
And I DID SAY -- that the "Intel report" was recycled intel wisdom from the 90s and that the dossier appendix was totally unverifiable and suspicious. And LOOKED like more of a "political hit piece" than any kind of Intel product. And this week -- even Andy McCabe said there wasn't much in it..
Did they diddle? Or did a hostile Congress refuse to grant ANYTHING to Obama? Be realistic.
Congressional approval was never the problem. When the Admin request goes to Congress, it's already been announced to be met with bipartisan support. Funding was already there in fact. For about 10 years.
Good point.
Obama pressed on many fronts to arm Ukraine
I think the fear is that it could turn Ukraine into a proxy war between the US and Russia....