Civil War: Dem Compares Obamacare Fight to Gettysburg

The plan all along, of course. Crash the system.

Both parties are engaged in crashing the other's priorities. Nothing new here.

Read what I'm writing, Jake. The plan was to crash the entire health care system, not reform it. And when it crashes, people will clamor for the government to take it over entirely. Nationalize it.

More power for government, more power over individual lives.

That's been the plan all along.

That may well be true, just as the neo-cons and reactionaries tried to soak up all the priorities to their goals, and force a collapse of the social entitlements so they could be turned over to privatization.

This is what both parties do, daveman.
 
That is a start, editec. Just like Margaret Thatcher, I have no problem with a NHC approved by 85% of the population.

It's a start, meaning we'll throw out a bad bill and constantly tinker with it instead of working to get a good bill in the first place.

You can thank the far left and the right of the Dems for where we are, no one else.

They are responsible for this monstrosity.

Jake? Your side had a veto-proof majority and passed your entire agenda without a single Republican vote.

It's ALL Obama and your Dems -- 100%
 
Last edited:
My side lost the elections of 2008 and 2012. Now Mike Lee wants to sink Obamacare or bring down government, but he is willing to keep provisions of "no pre-existing provisions can be excluded" and "no lifetime caps".

When my GOP comes out with a realistic health care solution, other than saying 'free market remedies', the which have failed a good portion of Americans, then I will listen to Mike Lee.

Not until then.
 
No correlation exists, Frank, with your trolling and the OP.

We GOP failed in health care solutions. The people elected Obama, in part, because we failed.

And you want to go back to as it was? Not going to happen.
 
My side lost the elections of 2008 and 2012. Now Mike Lee wants to sink Obamacare or bring down government, but he is willing to keep provisions of "no pre-existing provisions can be excluded" and "no lifetime caps".

When my GOP comes out with a realistic health care solution, other than saying 'free market remedies', the which have failed a good portion of Americans, then I will listen to Mike Lee.

Not until then.

The Free Market remedies you commies despise made this country the Number 1 economy on the planet in record time
 
And excluded a sizeable portion of Americans from affordable and accessible health care.

Most of the western free world takes care of its citizens far better than we do at a much lower cost.

Your point is senseless. Doing the same as the rest of the West is not going to not make us Number One.
 
No correlation exists, Frank, with your trolling and the OP.

We GOP failed in health care solutions. The people elected Obama, in part, because we failed.

And you want to go back to as it was? Not going to happen.

Jake why do you have to say "we GOP"? It's odd for someone who is really a Republican

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
 
Frank, you are not GOP so you have nothing to say about the party.

Many of us realize that we screwed the pooch on this, and the free market solutions have not worked.
 
Frank, you are not GOP so you have nothing to say about the party.

Many of us realize that we screwed the pooch on this, and the free market solutions have not worked.

When did we try free market solutions? Between US patients having to subsidize drug sales around the world or risk being locked out of those markets, to requiring hospitals to treat cases for free and passing the costs to other patients (that 8 dollar Tylenol) to not allowing interstate sales, to unending government regulation at every level of healthcare, it seems to me that the free market was abandoned ages ago.
 
Frank, you are not GOP so you have nothing to say about the party.

Many of us realize that we screwed the pooch on this, and the free market solutions have not worked.

When did we try free market solutions? Between US patients having to subsidize drug sales around the world or risk being locked out of those markets, to requiring hospitals to treat cases for free and passing the costs to other patients (that 8 dollar Tylenol) to not allowing interstate sales, to unending government regulation at every level of healthcare, it seems to me that the free market was abandoned ages ago.

Pharma making billions: go away, Steven.

Health insurance industry conducting death panels letting people die and not covering people with pre-existing conditions: go away, Steven.

GOP could have changed it anytime between 1994 to 2006, and did not: go away, Steven.

That is why we are where we are.
 
It's a start, meaning we'll throw out a bad bill and constantly tinker with it instead of working to get a good bill in the first place.

You can thank the far left and the right of the Dems for where we are, no one else.

They are responsible for this monstrosity.

Jake? Your side had a veto-proof majority and passed your entire agenda without a single Republican vote.

It's ALL Obama and your Dems -- 100%

Completely. But know it appears that Boehner and certain Repubes WANT Obamacare to stay put...

[SNIP] Republican leadership and how they continue to cave in on every single issue. Congress has the power of the purse to stop funding Obamacare and they just won't do it. We need to chip away at Obamacare thru the funding mechanisms. We need to either shut down certain parts of the government or else President Obama and Harry Reid will just wait for the Republicans to concede, which they have been doing. If Obamacare remains the law, then we can thank the current Republican leadership for not using the time to go after it now. The Senate will never repeal Obamacare fully, so it's the conservatives' job is to defund it any way it can. [/SNIP]

LINK
 
It also costs between 800 million to a billion to develop new drugs and bring them to the market. That doesn't include selling the drugs overseas in countries that have price controls and passing those savings on to the American patient. So they're making billions. So what? They're also spending billions in the process.

You want cheap insurance, but you want insurance to cover pre-existing conditions. You can't have both. Insurance was never intended to make sure some landwhale who ate herself into Diabetes can get her test strips. It was intended to make sure that things like extended hospital stays and surgeries didn't bankrupt the insurance holder, just like home insurance and car insurance. It was Washington constantly changing regulations and pushing HMOs that changed all that.
 
Insurance was exactly for that, Steven, not for making 7% profit in all division every year forever.

You are making assertions without evidence, but if you are right, the GOP congress could have change it from 1994 to 2006.

Guess what?
 
It also costs between 800 million to a billion to develop new drugs and bring them to the market. That doesn't include selling the drugs overseas in countries that have price controls and passing those savings on to the American patient. So they're making billions. So what? They're also spending billions in the process.

You want cheap insurance, but you want insurance to cover pre-existing conditions. You can't have both. Insurance was never intended to make sure some landwhale who ate herself into Diabetes can get her test strips. It was intended to make sure that things like extended hospital stays and surgeries didn't bankrupt the insurance holder, just like home insurance and car insurance. It was Washington constantly changing regulations and pushing HMOs that changed all that.


Indeed and attempting to take over HEALTHCARE. The utopian dream. Once Despots get hold of people's healthcare? THEY are in a position to run individual lives. And isn't that what Obamacare is about? Control.

Liberty of the individual be damned.
 
Insurance was exactly for that, Steven, not for making 7% profit in all division every year forever.

You are making assertions without evidence, but if you are right, the GOP congress could have change it from 1994 to 2006.

Guess what?

So what if they made a profit? That's why people go into business in the first place.

Congress can't change the laws unilaterally. Want to guess how Slick Willie would have reacted if the GOP had pushed a bill onto his desk?
 
Insurance was exactly for that, Steven, not for making 7% profit in all division every year forever.

You are making assertions without evidence, but if you are right, the GOP congress could have change it from 1994 to 2006.

Guess what?

So what if they made a profit? That's why people go into business in the first place.

Congress can't change the laws unilaterally. Want to guess how Slick Willie would have reacted if the GOP had pushed a bill onto his desk?

Somebody above said the Dems changed them. Why couldn't the GOP.

No one has problems with profit, but when industry is conducting death panels, yea, there is a real problem.

Bill would have signed a real health care reform bill in a heart beat. George Bush certainly would.
 
Insurance was exactly for that, Steven, not for making 7% profit in all division every year forever.

You are making assertions without evidence, but if you are right, the GOP congress could have change it from 1994 to 2006.

Guess what?

So what if they made a profit? That's why people go into business in the first place.

Congress can't change the laws unilaterally. Want to guess how Slick Willie would have reacted if the GOP had pushed a bill onto his desk?

Somebody above said the Dems changed them. Why couldn't the GOP.

No one has problems with profit, but when industry is conducting death panels, yea, there is a real problem.

Bill would have signed a real health care reform bill in a heart beat. George Bush certainly would.

And George Bush is no better than Obama...HE is a Statist same as Obama...

YOUR point Mr. Commie hack?
 
Somebody above said the Dems changed them. Why couldn't the GOP.

The GOP had control of both Houses and the White House from 2001 to 2009. The Dems had control of both Houses with a Supermajority and the White House from 2009 to 2011. See the difference?

No one has problems with profit, but when industry is conducting death panels, yea, there is a real problem.
It comes down to allocation of resources. Spend the money on someone who is terminal and that money isn't there for someone who isn't. Is it worth it to spend several hundred thousands of dollars on a procedure for someone who might have a miniscule chance to live or to spend that money on people that had a reasonable chance at recovery?

Those laws of Economics are just as harsh and unforgiving as the laws of physics.

Bill would have signed a real health care reform bill in a heart beat. George Bush certainly would.

Depends on what was in it.

While we're on the subject, it wasn't like the Dems in Congress were happy to go along with the Republicans on health care during the Bush years. Remember the fiasco that went along with Medicare Part D?

Washington never has a mindset to fix the little problems, but they go out of their way to scrap the entire system and hope for the best.
 
The GOP had control of both Houses and the White House from 2001 to 2009. The Dems had control of both Houses with a Supermajority and the White House from 2009 to 2011. See the difference?

Bullshit.

The simply reality is Democrats only had a filibuster-proof majority from September 24, 2009 to February 4, 2010, as was noted by talkingpointsmemo.com

FOX NEWS LIES: Obama only had a majority for 133 days, not two years - Detroit liberal | Examiner.com

Chris Wallace: Obama Had A Filibuster Proof Senate Majority For 2 Years | TPM LiveWire
 

Forum List

Back
Top