Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire.

No it doesn't.

According to the law it does.

That you do not agree does not change the law.

When I was on recruiting duty a retired Marine invited our entire RS recruiting staff to have dinner at one of the local casinos. His only stipulation was we all wore our dress blues.

We had to get the dinner approved ahead of time and each had to report it as a gift received.

It was not a big deal
 
I don't think that you have any evidence that Thomas ruled in favor of his friends on any SCOTUS case. If you can't even produce a case where there was even the appearance that he did then you cannot prove any "patronage"
I don't need evidence of that.

Clarence is a reliable vote for reactionary interests....he also has the ear of his fellow conservatives on the Court.

In any other context, Crow would be referred to as Clarence's patron.
 
I'm curious as to why you call it a "gift"

If his rich friend picked him up in a very expensive car and drove him somewhere is that a "gift" too?

If he and his wife spent a weekend at the mansion of a rich friend is that a "gift"?

I'm not saying that Thomas is perfectly upright but people are still allowed to have friends ( even rich ones) and there is really no money involved in Thomas's position and no way to really know if and when any particular case is going to be heard by SCOTUS in any given year how much can he be influenced realistically?

Read the article.
 
Jet travel, free resort stays, and superyacht trips have been revealed as a huge conflict of interest in the midst of a scandal involving Clarence Thomas. It is important for judges to be transparent about their financial dealings and failure to do so can lead to calls for impeachment.

he did it for more than 20 years!
 
Jet travel, free resort stays, and superyacht trips have been revealed as a huge conflict of interest in the midst of a scandal involving Clarence Thomas. It is important for judges to be transparent about their financial dealings and failure to do so can lead to calls for impeachment.

he did it for more than 20 years!
There was a time when this would have mattered. Now it'll just be denied and/or summarily dismissed. Followed by attacks.
 
Jet travel, free resort stays, and superyacht trips have been revealed as a huge conflict of interest in the midst of a scandal involving Clarence Thomas. It is important for judges to be transparent about their financial dealings and failure to do so can lead to calls for impeachment.

he did it for more than 20 years!

Doubtful. But lets see where the investigation goes.
 
Jet travel, free resort stays, and superyacht trips have been revealed as a huge conflict of interest in the midst of a scandal involving Clarence Thomas. It is important for judges to be transparent about their financial dealings and failure to do so can lead to calls for impeachment.

he did it for more than 20 years!
Racist.

I say you indict him with Trump.

You know what they say, if you can't beat them, arrest them.
 
Jet travel, free resort stays, and superyacht trips have been revealed as a huge conflict of interest in the midst of a scandal involving Clarence Thomas. It is important for judges to be transparent about their financial dealings and failure to do so can lead to calls for impeachment.
he did it for more than 20 years!
Call for impeachment all you want.
Nothing will happen.
 
Same with ethics. It's a thing of the past.
No one can live up to the ethical standards of the DNC.

Not even the Catholic church.

4b053c649edc7cca2e095a0379975ebe


How do you do it?
 
Jet travel, free resort stays, and superyacht trips have been revealed as a huge conflict of interest in the midst of a scandal involving Clarence Thomas. It is important for judges to be transparent about their financial dealings and failure to do so can lead to calls for impeachment.

he did it for more than 20 years!

So are you gonna get a rope and lynch that darkie?
 
Doubtful. But lets see where the investigation goes.
What investigation, ProPublica? Ha! New York Time? There is no official investigation. I have never read where they are anything but above the law after they are confirmed. The Thomases have it made.
 
If a person owns a private jet how is it a gift to give a person a ride in it?

If you pick up a SCOUTS judge in your car and give him a ride is it a "gift"
there is that argument too...but I've not even seen any evidence he didn't pay a fare.

I have not seen where anyone other then radical leftist website have even reported on this....the OP might as well used a link to Stormfront bashing the man
 
I don't need evidence of that.

Clarence is a reliable vote for reactionary interests....he also has the ear of his fellow conservatives on the Court.

In any other context, Crow would be referred to as Clarence's patron.
Give me an example of a vote or opinion of his that was "reactionary" - actually what does that even mean in terms of the Court? aren't all opinion a reaction to something? Like, I don't know, the case in front of them?
 
I mean this.

You're an idiot.

Charter a jet, and a "superyatch"...

Bring back the invoice.
why don't you all show us the invoices you are claiming Thomas didn't pay....I'll wait for you to show us some proof...until you do, this is just another demaklan attack on an African-American they don't control
 

Forum List

Back
Top