Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's recused himself from 54 cases, nimrod.Not when the case applies to his good billionaire friend.
He didn't need to, dumbass. Hospitality is not a gift. If you stay at a friend's cabin in the mountains, do you declare it on your taxes?'
not where it involved his billionaire friend.
He didn't need to, dumbass. Hospitality is not a gift. If you stay at a friend's cabin in the mountains, do you declare it on your taxes?
Until quite recently the law said he doesn't have to, dumbass.You can ramble mindlessly and not address what I said all you want.
It could be his poor neighbor but if you know them well you recuse yourself.
Looks stupid, hospitality is not considered a gift that needs to be claimed. Period. See Bob Menendez. But keep being a good racist Dem and attack Thomas.You can ramble mindlessly and not address what I said all you want.
It could be his poor neighbor but if you know them well you recuse yourself.
You just admitted he didn't have to report it.Looks stupid, hospitality is not considered a gift that needs to be claimed. Period. See Bob Menendez. But keep being a good racist Dem and attack Thomas.
I wasn’t talking to you, I was responding to pknopp. I agree with you Thomas did nothing illegal here.You just admitted he didn't have to report it.
How did I attack Thomas?
What a dumbass.
Sorry about that. I thought I was responding to pknopp.I wasn’t talking to you, I was responding to pknopp. I agree with you Thomas did nothing illegal here.
Looks stupid, hospitality is not considered a gift that needs to be claimed. Period. See Bob Menendez. But keep being a good racist Dem and attack Thomas.
You claim he’s a lawbreaker. Citing that law. And you have yet to show that that man in particular had business before the court. If he had, it would have been brought up long before now.I said NOTHING about claimed. I understand you are reluctant to address what I actually said.
You claim he’s a lawbreaker. Citing that law. And you have yet to show that that man in particular had business before the court. If he had, it would have been brought up long before now.
And he is not unethical. He followed the laws as written. So you can’t actually show that particular man having business before the court. Don’t feel bad, nobody else has been able to either.I claimed he is unethical.
The link was provided showing the case he had before the court. Read it.
And he is not unethical. He followed the laws as written. So you can’t actually show that particular man having business before the court. Don’t feel bad, nobody else has been able to either.
Deflect? How? By demanding you show proof of YOUR claim? Showing your racism like a good Dem.Already did. You just want to deflect.
Unless it's in writing, it's not a violation, dumbass.There is no law. It's simple common sense and ethics.