Clarence Thomas drank heavily, watched porn

I wonder if you realize the importance that one word has in this whole fantasy of yours.

I do Moon, but the heart wants what the heart wants, yanno?
Curious. Do you EVER actually think or do you just hystericaly emote here?

Because if the former, you might find more satisfaction from a Dr. Phil or Oprah forum.

Nah. Thinking is beyond her. She just posts words as the voices tell her.

Doesn't she claim to be a lawyer or something? Hmm...
 
You dun think a severe drug abuse history bears on fitness for a seat on our highest court?

Color me *stupified* here.

As for Thomas bitchslapping this broad....if nothing happens, it is because he knows she is telling the TRUTH.

i think an *alleged* history of alcoholism combined with decades of recovery absolutely bears on fitness for a seat on the court. just not the way you seem to.

it' interesting that you seem to think that addiction is some kind of moral issue, and that you deliberately choose to substitute the word *drug* for *alcohol*. i'll grant that alcohol is a drug, but there have been no allegations that i'm aware of that thomas abused *drugs* in the commonly accepted sense of the word.

Del, the expression "sober as a judge" exists for a reason. If alcoholism ain't a character issue, then it's a fitness one. Mebbe if Thomas "had been in recovery for decades" when he was appointed, I'd agree. But if the ex-gfs allegations are true, he'd quit drinking just months before.

Not enough time, IMO.

she gave no time frame that i saw as to when she dated him, just that it was for several years prior to his nomination, so that's really not germane, and even if he had quit "just months before", he'd still quit and apparently has remained sober since then.

if you'd like me to, i'd be happy to provide links to sitting judges, past and present, libral and conservative, who have run afoul of the law due to their drinking, so i'm afraid you'll have to ply that *sober as a judge* canard elsewhere. ;)
 
You might be able to spend half an hour high on coke with a child and they not know. But drunk off your ass, no.

Kids notice the slurred speech, falling down coordination issues and boozy smell.

if you think every alcoholic is a falling down drunk, you know very little about alcoholism.

Every severe alcoholic is a falling down drunk. Usually daily.

bullshit. you really need to educate yourself before you look even more foolish.
 
I do Moon, but the heart wants what the heart wants, yanno?
Curious. Do you EVER actually think or do you just hystericaly emote here?

Because if the former, you might find more satisfaction from a Dr. Phil or Oprah forum.

Nah. Thinking is beyond her. She just posts words as the voices tell her.

Doesn't she claim to be a lawyer or something? Hmm...

Hey, The Rabbi.....when I need advice on posting styles I will let you know. I think people who rely on soft, mushy "I don't want to know" thinking are defective.

We are not alike, thank God.
 
10% unemployment
Economy in the shitter
Dollar crashing
Southern border wide open

And I should care about this obvious smear campaign because....?
 
10% unemployment
Economy in the shitter
Dollar crashing
Southern border wide open

And I should care about this obvious smear campaign because....?

It distracts attention from the coming electoral disaster for the Democrats.

I saw today that one Dem Rep from Alabama now claims he voted for McCain in the 2008 election. How pathetic is that?
 
While Thomas was watching porn Obama was having gay sex on crack in the back of a limo with Larry Sinclair.

Frank, does your Mommy know you skipped school today? Shouldn't you be working on your diaroma for social studies?

It's the year 2010, if POTUS can't have gay sex on crack in the back of a limo, then maybe "Hope" and "Change" really are "just words"
 
Every severe alcoholic is a falling down drunk. Usually daily.
You know little about alcoholism, then.

You cannot tell when someone is drunk? Give me a break. I have seen just about every flavor of alcoholism known to mankind, up close and personal...and if it is severe and active, it does not take a trained eye to spot.

More bullshittery from the cowardly cons who cannot condemn craven crap from other cons.

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which can not fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
--HERBERT SPENCER

you may know drunk, but you don't know shit about alcoholism.
 
This would fit in nicely with the Democrats in Meltdown thread. Recycling their old canards. When the violent rhetoric fails, the race card fails, then the Blame Bush card fails, time to take out the visions of Rosa Parks and kicking the Republicans to the back of the ... then images of race wars with Hispanics to 'punish your enemies,' now bring back Clarence Thomas and maybe if we kick him around some more...

Except it was Thomas who opened up this can of worms. Just last week he and his wife were demanding an apology from Anita Hill. It's absolutely no surprise that this has come out now. Hill was almost certainly telling the truth about Thomas. Now he's opened the door, I'd be surprised if you don't see more accusations.

i must have missed the part where thomas himself called for an apology.

i thought it was just his wife. gotta link?
 
You could be right, Si. Mebbe this broad has *nothing* to back up her allegations and this will end up as a "he said she said". If so, I'd agree...we have to deeply discount her statements because she likely has an axe (or two) to grind.

HOWEVER, if she can back up her claims....with evidence...different ballgame. I find it incredible (as in unbelievable, not fucking likely) that she'd speak on air without such evidence, and I hope like hell she has some.

But it is not logical or honest for you to announce that you plan to disregard evidence (tapes, letters, testimony of other witnesses, etc.) because this broad has a bias problem, and doing so makes you look kinda sorta s-t-u-p-i-d.

I wonder if you realize the importance that one word has in this whole fantasy of yours.

I do Moon, but the heart wants what the heart wants, yanno?

So facts be damned, you just want your pound of flesh? What a very immature way of looking at things. You might want to rethink that strategy if you ever want to be taken seriously.
 
This would fit in nicely with the Democrats in Meltdown thread. Recycling their old canards. When the violent rhetoric fails, the race card fails, then the Blame Bush card fails, time to take out the visions of Rosa Parks and kicking the Republicans to the back of the ... then images of race wars with Hispanics to 'punish your enemies,' now bring back Clarence Thomas and maybe if we kick him around some more...

Except it was Thomas who opened up this can of worms. Just last week he and his wife were demanding an apology from Anita Hill. It's absolutely no surprise that this has come out now. Hill was almost certainly telling the truth about Thomas. Now he's opened the door, I'd be surprised if you don't see more accusations.

i must have missed the part where thomas himself called for an apology.

i thought it was just his wife. gotta link?

He should go on national television to apologize for staining an intern's dress while pleasuring her with a cigar......

oh.
:eusa_hand:
right.....its been done already.
 

Forum List

Back
Top