BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Don’t cry.Do what you like. Pity, no pity, is all the same to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t cry.Do what you like. Pity, no pity, is all the same to me.
I'll cry if I feeeel like it.Don’t cry.
It's in the OP......Good God, you're dense.
Here's a hint as to why he recused himself, Dumte:
Eastman, who had served as a law clerk to the justice
Thomas’s recusal was to avoid ethical conflicts and necessary because his wife is involved in the whole freaking January 6 mess.A recusal means that his vote wasn’t necessary. Eastman will walk.
ZzzI'll cry if I feeeel like it.
Woke up!
Shut up. The world would be better if you would.Woke up!
Make me, wimp.Shut up. The world would be better if you would.
Stop crying, little sissy puppy.Make me, wimp.
Because you say so? That means nothing at all. You snowflakes just get more pathetic by the day with your ceaseless whining about anyone who doesn't parrot your worldview.
It also heavily involves Ginny. Nothing alarms me.Stop crying, little sissy puppy.
Meanwhile, back on topic:
Justice Thomas recused himself from a case involving his own prior law Secretary. As he should have.
Does that alarm you?
Nope. Making up shit — as you just did — doesn’t qualify as an actual “argument.”Thomas recused because his 'ol lady is in the thick of this one.
It's a fairly steep learning curve, but I did read about Ginni having some involvement. You want me to google a link? Too bad.Nope. Making up shit — as you just did — doesn’t qualify as an actual “argument.”
Apparently you’ve given up completely on engaging in honest discourse.
No surprise. You’ve always sucked ass at this.
Ginni has had occasion to exercise free speech. The spouse of a SCOTUS Justice is free to exercise her (or his) Constitutional rights. Doing so is not a valid basis upon which to insist that the Justice must recuse himself on any related topic.It's a fairly steep learning curve, but I did read about Ginni having some involvement. You want me to google a link? Too bad.
No one insisted. He did it.Ginni has had occasion to exercise free speech. The spouse of a SCOTUS Justice is free to exercise her (or his) Constitutional rights. Doing so is not a valid basis upon which to insist that the Justice minister at recuse himself on any related topic.
Go pound salt up your ass. You’re still quite a worthless little simp.
She is on emails and was in conversations with Mark Meadows, Trump’s chief of staff regarding the insurrection.Ginni has had occasion to exercise free speech.
Following the advice of his security detail is hardly corrupt. If you liberal loons didn't send assassins after Justices it might be a legitimate thing for you to whine about. Alas, the corrupt left has no leg to stand on.Because he flew on a private jet provided his millionaire buddy. These trips WERE NOT REPORTED.
US Supreme Court's Thomas flew on GOP donor's jet, cites security risks
Clarence Thomas cited security concerns to justify accepting flights by private jet last year.www.reuters.com
Thomas Took Dozens of Trips Paid For By Friends. These trips WERE NOT REPORTED.
Thomas took dozens of trips paid for by billionaire friends: ProPublica
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has taken dozens of trips paid for by at least four billionaire friends during his time on the bench, a new report from ProPublica found. The report expands up…thehill.com
After trips Thomas ruled on cases before SCOTUS directily connected the men who paid for his trips and private jet flights.
Thomas is corrupt.
They’re not both conservatives (Thomas and Eastman?)?Actually, they are not aligned politically.
And your initial claim(s) are in the toilet. Your post was nonsensical.
Moron's r Us is hiring.No chance 6-3 rulings usually follow ideology?