Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So let's have some reality here, no one can say our school system works well for the majority of the children. And it isn't because we have not thrown enough money at the school system, just give up that fallacy. We also know that it has be left wing liberals who have been running the failing school systems. So, what we are going to do is double down on stupid and instead of teaching kids how to read and write let's teach them something they have absolutely no control over but it is something we can get them to fear. Something to fear that can be used to demonstrate how only the government can save us from our own demise. How corporations, that feed our children in many different ways, is evil only the government is good. BS teach the kids the three Rs and let them read books to figure out the rest. That said I have no problem with teaching kids that the weather within a climate changes as it has from the beginning of the world. But if it is nothing more then the religion of the GW fearist, that I have a problem.
As for the creation/evolution debate. I get so damn tired of the liberal left bring this issue up as if it means a hill of beans. The truth is that the liberal left wing has no real explanation of how life started on Earth. Yes, most of the "thinkers" on the left will snidely say, evolution explains it all, when in fact the evolutionary theory does nothing of the sort, they are showing they are low information voters. Evolution is a dead end in explaining creation of life. So what theory actually makes the most sense? Panspermia? Transpermia? "primordial soup" ? Was at the beginning? Take your choice, at this time and date all valid.
So let's have some reality here, no one can say our school system works well for the majority of the children. And it isn't because we have not thrown enough money at the school system, just give up that fallacy. We also know that it has be left wing liberals who have been running the failing school systems. .
I cant believe their going to allow science in the classrooms...What is this? A Classroom?
Uhm, it's junk science for the terminally gullible.
So far, you're only "point" is that I'm stupid. Then you expect some kind of substantive response from me.
You are right, the argument was over before it began. You never even attempted an argument.
My point wasn't that you're stupid. My point was that you're full of shit. You proved that when you refused to provide even one name of someone who supports the crap you said. Not one name! You proved my point for me when you attempted your lame cop out excuse as to why you couldn't provide even a single name.
I didn't prove anything of the sort. I simply declined to get into a mud wrestling contest with an idiot. Scientists who are skeptical of global warming are quite well known. Even someone as stupid as you can look them up. Furthermore, it's a point not worth contesting. That's why you are contesting it so vehemently. If you had any point other than ad hominems, you would have made them.
I suppose Stephen Hawking has gone as far as anyone in unraveling the mysteries of life.
.
I suppose Stephen Hawking has gone as far as anyone in unraveling the mysteries of life.
.
Stephen Hawking on climate change:
He said: It is possible that the human race could become extinct but it is not inevitable. I think it is almost certain that a disaster, such as nuclear war or global warming will befall the earth within a thousand years.
It is a warning Professor Hawking has been sharing for years. Back in 2007 speaking at the Royal Society in London he called on scientists to live up to their duty of sharing information about the potential disaster of climate change, referring to it as one of the greatest threats facing human-kind.
Stephen Hawking: Climate change greatest threat posed to human-kind | RTCC - Climate change news
Wavinggirl -
Absolutely. Hawking is one of the greatest scientific minds of our time.
I think we need to be very careful about claiming to understand more about science than he does!
So little of what schools teach now is actually factual.
Well, there's nothing wrong with what people call climate science. It's just that like the topic of the origins of our species, people who need it to be false will create a version of it that can be refuted, or ridiculed, and insist their version of it is what it actually is.
What the AGW cultists believe isn't science. It's a con. No one "needs" it do be false, just as no one needs the earth centric view of the solar system to be false.
Why did they change it from "Global Warming" to "Climate Change"? Because they couldn't sell their hoax when we were experiencing record cold temperatures. "Climate Change" covers all arguments. If it's hot outside, they can say "See, I told you so". If it's cold outside, they can say "See, I told you so". Why did the alarmists (politically active scientists) hide evidence that contradicted their claims? Government funding. They can't get rich off taxpayer money if the world found out they were full of shit, and the liberal politicians supported their cover-up because THEY were benefiting by it. After all, CONTROL is what this is all about.
I realized it as soon as they changed it, asshole. Nothing I said would indicate otherwise. And no, I'm not interested in hearing your bullshit explanations. I've heard it many times before. You can save it for the sheep.It changed in the late 1980's - interesting that you have only now realised that!
What climate change means and does not mean is very clear, and I can explain it to you if you are genuinely interested.
My point wasn't that you're stupid. My point was that you're full of shit. You proved that when you refused to provide even one name of someone who supports the crap you said. Not one name! You proved my point for me when you attempted your lame cop out excuse as to why you couldn't provide even a single name.
I didn't prove anything of the sort. I simply declined to get into a mud wrestling contest with an idiot. Scientists who are skeptical of global warming are quite well known. Even someone as stupid as you can look them up. Furthermore, it's a point not worth contesting. That's why you are contesting it so vehemently. If you had any point other than ad hominems, you would have made them.
Providing a single name is "mud wrestling" now? ha! You'll do anything to not have to back up your asinine comments. You've once again been exposed as a loud mouthed, no substance troll who will do anything to get out of providing actual proof for any of the shit you claim.
I can see why you are anti-science....Science is based on evidence and providing proof. Foreign concepts for you.
I realized it as soon as they changed it, asshole. Nothing I said would indicate otherwise. And no, I'm not interested in hearing your bullshit explanations. I've heard it many times before. You can save it for the sheep.It changed in the late 1980's - interesting that you have only now realised that!
What climate change means and does not mean is very clear, and I can explain it to you if you are genuinely interested.
I realized it as soon as they changed it, asshole. Nothing I said would indicate otherwise. And no, I'm not interested in hearing your bullshit explanations. I've heard it many times before. You can save it for the sheep.It changed in the late 1980's - interesting that you have only now realised that!
What climate change means and does not mean is very clear, and I can explain it to you if you are genuinely interested.
Lets see the liberals two main topics in science, global warming, and a fetus is not a baby. The funny part is they call us out of touch.
Oh, I understand, alright. I understand you have a lot of claims you can't support, and your solution is always to tell Americans to stop being productive. I also understand that the U.S. is one of the least polluting industrialized countries in the world, yet the alarmists never focus on the REAL polluters, like China, Mexico, and the Arab oil producing countries, only the U.S.I realized it as soon as they changed it, asshole. Nothing I said would indicate otherwise. And no, I'm not interested in hearing your bullshit explanations. I've heard it many times before. You can save it for the sheep.It changed in the late 1980's - interesting that you have only now realised that!
What climate change means and does not mean is very clear, and I can explain it to you if you are genuinely interested.
Right. You aren't interested. You won't listen.
Which is also why you don't understand.
Congratulations on that.
