Climate Change Science Poised to Enter Nation's Classrooms

Little-Acorn said:
Manmade Global Warming has no factual backing whatsoever.

In truth, climates frequently change.

Sometimes the climate gets warmer.

And sometimes it gets colder.

That's been going on for as long as the planet has been orbiting the Sun. Or, as long as it's had a climate, at least.

And man has never had the slightest influence on it.

Even the leftist loons who scream about how we have to use government to change everything, go back to the stone age, etc., to prevent some unknown catastrophe, have never been able to come up with even ONE study or example that backs up their claims.

What's funny is that, when they do name some study, it invariably turns out to be nothing but a bunch of long-winded claims which, finally, refer to some other "study" for proof. And what is in that other "study"? You guessed it - more long-winded claims, and eventually a reference to yet another study. And you can guess what is in that one, too.

The leftist global-whatever loons have been insisting on impending doom, and the urgent need to give government massive powers to change every bit of our lives to "avoid" that doom, for at least 40 years by my count. Literally billions of dollars have changed hands - usually into their hands - all over the world. And they still haven't come up with one shred of proof that man has had the least bit of influence on the climate changes that happen regularly around us. Nor is there any proof that man can do anything to change it.

***40 YEARS*** of screaming, caterwauling, and doomsaying. All without the slightest proof. Just references to references to references, ad infinitum. And demands that they be given complete power over all of us, to change what they cannot change.

Is this a record?

(Probably not. Leftist loons have been with us a LONG time. )
Little Acorn -

Isn't it interesting that the science is so simple - and yet not one single scientific organisation agrees with you.

And out of all these supposedly "scientific" organizations... still not a single study that proves a link between man's activities and Global Whatever.

Nothing but the same constant deflections, excuses, and "it's in there somewhere".

Ad infinitum.....
 
Little-Acorn said:
Manmade Global Warming has no factual backing whatsoever.

In truth, climates frequently change.

Sometimes the climate gets warmer.

And sometimes it gets colder.

That's been going on for as long as the planet has been orbiting the Sun. Or, as long as it's had a climate, at least.

And man has never had the slightest influence on it.

Even the leftist loons who scream about how we have to use government to change everything, go back to the stone age, etc., to prevent some unknown catastrophe, have never been able to come up with even ONE study or example that backs up their claims.

What's funny is that, when they do name some study, it invariably turns out to be nothing but a bunch of long-winded claims which, finally, refer to some other "study" for proof. And what is in that other "study"? You guessed it - more long-winded claims, and eventually a reference to yet another study. And you can guess what is in that one, too.

The leftist global-whatever loons have been insisting on impending doom, and the urgent need to give government massive powers to change every bit of our lives to "avoid" that doom, for at least 40 years by my count. Literally billions of dollars have changed hands - usually into their hands - all over the world. And they still haven't come up with one shred of proof that man has had the least bit of influence on the climate changes that happen regularly around us. Nor is there any proof that man can do anything to change it.

***40 YEARS*** of screaming, caterwauling, and doomsaying. All without the slightest proof. Just references to references to references, ad infinitum. And demands that they be given complete power over all of us, to change what they cannot change.

Is this a record?

(Probably not. Leftist loons have been with us a LONG time. )
Little Acorn -

Isn't it interesting that the science is so simple - and yet not one single scientific organisation agrees with you.

And out of all these supposedly "scientific" organizations... still not a single study that proves a link between man's activities and Global Whatever.

Nothing but the same constant deflections, excuses, and "it's in there somewhere".

Ad infinitum.....

As I've said before, one of the reasons why this topic becomes so cluttered, without reason to be, is because many people without knowledge of the subject insist on treating it like a political issue.

In any case, it is proven that there is some connection, certainly, between human activities and global warming.
 
Little-Acorn said:
Manmade Global Warming has no factual backing whatsoever.

In truth, climates frequently change.

Sometimes the climate gets warmer.

And sometimes it gets colder.

That's been going on for as long as the planet has been orbiting the Sun. Or, as long as it's had a climate, at least.

And man has never had the slightest influence on it.

Even the leftist loons who scream about how we have to use government to change everything, go back to the stone age, etc., to prevent some unknown catastrophe, have never been able to come up with even ONE study or example that backs up their claims.

What's funny is that, when they do name some study, it invariably turns out to be nothing but a bunch of long-winded claims which, finally, refer to some other "study" for proof. And what is in that other "study"? You guessed it - more long-winded claims, and eventually a reference to yet another study. And you can guess what is in that one, too.

The leftist global-whatever loons have been insisting on impending doom, and the urgent need to give government massive powers to change every bit of our lives to "avoid" that doom, for at least 40 years by my count. Literally billions of dollars have changed hands - usually into their hands - all over the world. And they still haven't come up with one shred of proof that man has had the least bit of influence on the climate changes that happen regularly around us. Nor is there any proof that man can do anything to change it.

***40 YEARS*** of screaming, caterwauling, and doomsaying. All without the slightest proof. Just references to references to references, ad infinitum. And demands that they be given complete power over all of us, to change what they cannot change.

Is this a record?

(Probably not. Leftist loons have been with us a LONG time. )
Little Acorn -

Isn't it interesting that the science is so simple - and yet not one single scientific organisation agrees with you.

And out of all these supposedly "scientific" organizations... still not a single study that proves a link between man's activities and Global Whatever.

Nothing but the same constant deflections, excuses, and "it's in there somewhere".

Ad infinitum.....

You know how I know that you don't like to read?
 
And out of all these supposedly "scientific" organizations... still not a single study that proves a link between man's activities and Global Whatever.

Nothing but the same constant deflections, excuses, and "it's in there somewhere".

Ad infinitum.....

As I've said before, one of the reasons why this topic becomes so cluttered, without reason to be, is because many people without knowledge of the subject insist on treating it like a political issue.

In any case, it is proven that there is some connection, certainly, between human activities and global warming.

See? :cuckoo:
 
And out of all these supposedly "scientific" organizations... still not a single study that proves a link between man's activities and Global Whatever.

Nothing but the same constant deflections, excuses, and "it's in there somewhere".

Ad infinitum.....

As I've said before, one of the reasons why this topic becomes so cluttered, without reason to be, is because many people without knowledge of the subject insist on treating it like a political issue.

In any case, it is proven that there is some connection, certainly, between human activities and global warming.

See? :cuckoo:

As I said, the topic too often becomes cluttered with irrelevancies because people without knowledge of it make it a political issue. Or they treat it instead as an unrelated issue.

If you're really contesting the bare minimum, there is, again, known to be some connection between human activities and global warming. And if you are, you probably don't know much about the topic.
 
This thread is proof that liberals will buy into anything, as long as it's being promoted by other liberals. No one here yet has provided any proof, just claims. It's like evolution, they don't think they have to prove anything, others have to "disprove" it.
 
This thread is proof that liberals will buy into anything, as long as it's being promoted by other liberals. No one here yet has provided any proof, just claims. It's like evolution, they don't think they have to prove anything, others have to "disprove" it.

This is funny on so many levels. Thanks for the laugh!
 
Only liberals can complain when a winter is warmer then they think it should be, without telling us how cold it should be. utterly fantastic.
 
This thread is proof that liberals will buy into anything, as long as it's being promoted by other liberals. No one here yet has provided any proof, just claims. It's like evolution, they don't think they have to prove anything, others have to "disprove" it.

This is funny on so many levels. Thanks for the laugh!
I agree, it IS funny how you are so easily led.
 
This thread is proof that liberals will buy into anything, as long as it's being promoted by other liberals. No one here yet has provided any proof, just claims. It's like evolution, they don't think they have to prove anything, others have to "disprove" it.

This is funny on so many levels. Thanks for the laugh!
I agree, it IS funny how you are so easily led.

Remind me again, you believe in God, right?

When you answer that, know that you just made your previous statement look mighty ridiculous.

There is plenty of evidence for man made climate impact, you just don't want to believe it.
 
The Repubs are facing Global Warming like they did Cigarettes being addictive. They denied nicotine as an addictive drug for years...until most of them smoked themselves to death. They will deny this until the east coast in under water and Texas becomes a parched wasteland.
 
Lets see the liberals two main topics in science, global warming, and a fetus is not a baby. The funny part is they call us out of touch.

A fetus is a fetus and a baby is a baby. Which part of that confuses you?

No, actually a baby in the womb is a baby. Liberals scientifically came up with calling a baby a fetus, so you could kill them legally.and be proud about it.
 
The Repubs are facing Global Warming like they did Cigarettes being addictive. They denied nicotine as an addictive drug for years...until most of them smoked themselves to death. They will deny this until the east coast in under water and Texas becomes a parched wasteland.

Republicans never denied that nicotine is addictive or that cigarettes are bad for you. People have been calling them coffin nails at least since the 1920s.
 
The Repubs are facing Global Warming like they did Cigarettes being addictive. They denied nicotine as an addictive drug for years...until most of them smoked themselves to death. They will deny this until the east coast in under water and Texas becomes a parched wasteland.

Republicans never denied that nicotine is addictive or that cigarettes are bad for you. People have been calling them coffin nails at least since the 1920s.

Then why were doctors saying that it was okay to smoke cigarettes in the 40s and 50's?

Matter of fact, there are still idiots out there who are convinced cigarettes are good for you.

Google "cigarettes are good for you" sometime.
 
The Repubs are facing Global Warming like they did Cigarettes being addictive. They denied nicotine as an addictive drug for years...until most of them smoked themselves to death. They will deny this until the east coast in under water and Texas becomes a parched wasteland.

Republicans never denied that nicotine is addictive or that cigarettes are bad for you. People have been calling them coffin nails at least since the 1920s.
You missed the congressional hearings where paid hatchetmen said exactly that, under oath.
 
The Repubs are facing Global Warming like they did Cigarettes being addictive. They denied nicotine as an addictive drug for years...until most of them smoked themselves to death. They will deny this until the east coast in under water and Texas becomes a parched wasteland.

Republicans never denied that nicotine is addictive or that cigarettes are bad for you. People have been calling them coffin nails at least since the 1920s.

Then why were doctors saying that it was okay to smoke cigarettes in the 40s and 50's?

Matter of fact, there are still idiots out there who are convinced cigarettes are good for you.

Google "cigarettes are good for you" sometime.

I have no idea what doctors were saying about cigarettes in the 40s and 50s. What I do know is that the term "coffin nails" was already well known in the 1920s. It referred to cigarettes, so I doubt anyone was suffering from the delusion that smoking was a safe habit.
 
Republicans never denied that nicotine is addictive or that cigarettes are bad for you. People have been calling them coffin nails at least since the 1920s.

Then why were doctors saying that it was okay to smoke cigarettes in the 40s and 50's?

Matter of fact, there are still idiots out there who are convinced cigarettes are good for you.

Google "cigarettes are good for you" sometime.

I have no idea what doctors were saying about cigarettes in the 40s and 50s. What I do know is that the term "coffin nails" was already well known in the 1920s. It referred to cigarettes, so I doubt anyone was suffering from the delusion that smoking was a safe habit.

They were if they were listening to cigarette manufacturers and their advertising. In fact, I recall reading that there was one company back in the 1950's that advertised the health benefits of smoking.
 

Forum List

Back
Top