Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why biologist are capable to determine climate change :"Man-made climate change is “not a matter of opinion, but of careful evaluation of data from a vast spectrum of scientific disciplines.”
Anne Yoder, Society of Systematic Biologists
And if anyone in science is qualified to define climate science -- it would be a "Systematic Biologist"..
Hell --- he's RIGHT --- but if I tried that trick as a scientist -- you'd be all over my case.
Dex, basic math. How many days in 175,000 years?
Give up? 63,875,000.
How many inches in two miles?
Give up? 126,720
What accumulation rate is required to build up two miles of ice in 175,000 years?
Give up? 0.0019838748 inches per day
Think about that Mr Dex. Think hard.
Why biologist are capable to determine climate change :"Man-made climate change is “not a matter of opinion, but of careful evaluation of data from a vast spectrum of scientific disciplines.”
Anne Yoder, Society of Systematic Biologists
And if anyone in science is qualified to define climate science -- it would be a "Systematic Biologist"..
Hell --- he's RIGHT --- but if I tried that trick as a scientist -- you'd be all over my case.
there are species of plants and animals that need certain climatic conditions to survive.
for example the malaria moskito. i think it cannot take freezing.
so when it gets warmer, that means the climate changes, these animals can expand their living space further north or south then before.
biologists are finding these movements, therefore climate is changing.
thus biologist have determined that there is global warming.
i hope i have educated how diffrent Scientist who are not climatologists can help understand climate and its changes.
btw archeologists who find evidence of plant species and animals can help determine past climates in locations
Numerous plant and animal species are moving outside their normal ranges in response to rising temperatures.
There is nothing that proves that plants or animals haven't adapted to a different climate. It is of course evolution, correct? Adaptation is a necessary element in order for species to survive. All you have is folks seeing something and instead of testing and comparing a plant or animal in x and a plant or animal in y area to see if they are genetically the same, you have a quick conclusion that it must be climate. This may only mean you actually have nothing.Why biologist are capable to determine climate change :"Man-made climate change is “not a matter of opinion, but of careful evaluation of data from a vast spectrum of scientific disciplines.”
Anne Yoder, Society of Systematic Biologists
And if anyone in science is qualified to define climate science -- it would be a "Systematic Biologist"..
Hell --- he's RIGHT --- but if I tried that trick as a scientist -- you'd be all over my case.
there are species of plants and animals that need certain climatic conditions to survive.
for example the malaria moskito. i think it cannot take freezing.
so when it gets warmer, that means the climate changes, these animals can expand their living space further north or south then before.
biologists are finding these movements, therefore climate is changing.
thus biologist have determined that there is global warming.
i hope i have educated how diffrent Scientist who are not climatologists can help understand climate and its changes.
btw archeologists who find evidence of plant species and animals can help determine past climates in locations
Numerous plant and animal species are moving outside their normal ranges in response to rising temperatures.
This is just pathetic.
We had all this noise a few years ago when trees bloomed here in Nashville in mid March, earlier than normal. the next year, they didn't bloom until mid April - and the warmers shut up...
Meanwhile, Earth climate data continues to read
1. NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
2. NO WARMING in the OCEANS
3. NO NET ICE MELT
4. NO BREAKOUT in 'cane activity
5. NO RISE in ocean levels
6. NO WARMING on the surface of Antarctica, Siberia, and everywhere else there is not a growing urban area
Hauke, you are correct. Numerous plant and animal species are moving outside their normal ranges in response to rising temperatures. That has disturbed large number of biological cycles and predator-prey relationships. Do not be concerned about Westwall giving you grief. Nor SSDD, jc456, Crusader Frank, LaDexter or a dozen other deniers here. They are all fools still fretting about Al Gore and communist conspiracies.
You have nothing from the mid Atlantic Ridge - nothing.
Show us the mid Atlantic Ridge data (2 miles down...)
Hauke, you are correct. Numerous plant and animal species are moving outside their normal ranges in response to rising temperatures. That has disturbed large number of biological cycles and predator-prey relationships. Do not be concerned about Westwall giving you grief. Nor SSDD, jc456, Crusader Frank, LaDexter or a dozen other deniers here. They are all fools still fretting about Al Gore and communist conspiracies.
They're magnetic stripes, similar to the ones lining the ocean floor at mid-ocean ridges. David Bridges, a geophysicist from the Missouri University of Science and Technology, and his colleagues sniffed them out using a bit of geological detective work, lots of walking and the hulking magnetometers strapped to their backpacks.
They're magnetic stripes, similar to the ones lining the ocean floor at mid-ocean ridges. David Bridges, a geophysicist from the Missouri University of Science and Technology, and his colleagues sniffed them out using a bit of geological detective work, lots of walking and the hulking magnetometers strapped to their backpacks.
I was right. Nobody went to the bottom of the ocean.
Nobody....
They're magnetic stripes, similar to the ones lining the ocean floor at mid-ocean ridges. David Bridges, a geophysicist from the Missouri University of Science and Technology, and his colleagues sniffed them out using a bit of geological detective work, lots of walking and the hulking magnetometers strapped to their backpacks.
I was right. Nobody went to the bottom of the ocean.
Nobody....
I was right. Nobody went to the bottom of the ocean.
We have tools that allow us to make measurements at a distance.
It's like science and stuff.
And if you read the article, they were able to measure the alternating stripes on dry land ya fuckin' moron.
So if you didn't go down to the bottom of the ocean and actually measure it, how do you know it switched?
There literally should be a point a certain distance from the fault where it flips.
"should be..." but you and yours didn't check.
So if you didn't go down to the bottom of the ocean and actually measure it, how do you know it switched?
There literally should be a point a certain distance from the fault where it flips.
"should be..." but you and yours didn't check.
Indeed. It's called "remote sensing" and it is very accurate within certain parameters. The magnetic stripes actually cross the entire oceanic floor, they are not limited to the mid ocean rifts.
Indeed. It's called "remote sensing" and it is very accurate within certain parameters. The magnetic stripes actually cross the entire oceanic floor, they are not limited to the mid ocean rifts.
That's because the entire floor was created by the rifts.