Clinton (Bill) and Trump both like extramarital affairs. What’s the difference?

[Pilot1]

LOL! Michelle Obama. Another anti American Race Hustler. How about Al Sharpton, or Maxine Waters instead?

 

[sealybobo]

Clinton had sex with woman he knew.

Trump had unprotected sex with nasty porn stars, strumpets, tarts and tramps and spent maybe millions for a little 'tang.

I assume you are using sarcasm.

Your scumbag is much less scummy.

At least Bill Clinton doesn’t fantasize about his daughter

Clinton, even counting private transgressions, tried to do what was best for the country, while the orange whore seeks to destroy it. Moreover, Clinton didn't align himself with a wave of cheap trash punks who have done nothing but bitch, scream, and whine about sex and try to tell Americans when, how, and with whom to have it, while bedding everyone available and then getting "blessed" by these fools and then endorsing for the Senate some little bitch who ran around shopping malls chasing teenagers.

Clinton was popular moreso than any recent President. He could have looked the American People in the eye and said “I did have sex with that woman” and his ratings still would have been in tact. Therein lies the difference. Clinton gets a pass.

A pass on lying about cheating on your wife?

Both trump and Clinton did it but Clinton got impeached and disbarred. That’s a pass?

Clinton also got you judging him. Trump gets a pass from you

 

[sealybobo]

If everything they said about Trump is true it means that he had a single extra marital affair before he became president. How could you compare it to Hiillary's "bimbo eruption squad" and the molestation of an intern barely older than Bill's daughter?

Trump had more than one extra marital affiar if you are counting Stormy Daniels...

Marla Maples was his mistress when Donald John Trump was married to Ivana and had a child out of wedlock.

Also Donald has a list of women that have accused him of cheating just like William Jefferson Blythe III...

So Donald John Trump has a history of cheating and lying.

What is the difference between Donald and Bill?

1. Donald infidelity happen before he was President and has yet to have a fat intern spit on her blue dress.

2. Trump has yet to lie under oath or to Congress unlike Slick Willy!

What’s the difference?

But he lies to us daily. Still impeachable. Doesn’t have to be under oath. If we found proof busk knew there were no wmds we could have impeached him even without lying under oath.

Trump may have lied about colluding with russia. Not as big as getting a bj but you know

Did I write it was no big deal?

Also is the Mueller investigation done?

Also, if you are going to play this game then Clinton bombed Iraq on thr eve of his Impeachment based on lies!

So let cut the nonsense and if Trump were still a Democrat you would be defending him!

Democrats and Liberals had no problem with Trump’s fantasies about grabbing pussies back in the day when he was writing checks to Hillary and being a top Bush critic while Democrats and their base were calling Bush a war criminal.

You guys argued with us when we said no wmds. When trump said it you voted for him

 

[BuckToothMoron]

What’s the difference?

Bill Clinton had a good reason- he was married to a disgustingly gross overstuffed bag of skin. Trump does it ‘cause chicks dig billionaires, or at least skanky ones do.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Clinton had sex with woman he knew.

Trump had unprotected sex with nasty porn stars, strumpets, tarts and tramps and spent maybe millions for a little 'tang.

I assume you are using sarcasm.

Your scumbag is much less scummy.

At least Bill Clinton doesn’t fantasize about his daughter

Clinton, even counting private transgressions, tried to do what was best for the country, while the orange whore seeks to destroy it. Moreover, Clinton didn't align himself with a wave of cheap trash punks who have done nothing but bitch, scream, and whine about sex and try to tell Americans when, how, and with whom to have it, while bedding everyone available and then getting "blessed" by these fools and then endorsing for the Senate some little bitch who ran around shopping malls chasing teenagers.

Clinton was popular moreso than any recent President. He could have looked the American People in the eye and said “I did have sex with that woman” and his ratings still would have been in tact. Therein lies the difference. Clinton gets a pass.

A pass on lying about cheating on your wife?

Both trump and Clinton did it but Clinton got impeached and disbarred. That’s a pass?

Clinton also got you judging him. Trump gets a pass from you

Hahaha- silly liberal still thinks it was spooge on a dress that got Willie impeached. Sorry sport, you can cheat on your wife and get away with it, but lie to a grand jury about it and there will be consequences. History can be a bitch to the less informed.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Clinton had sex with woman he knew.

Trump had unprotected sex with nasty porn stars, strumpets, tarts and tramps and spent maybe millions for a little 'tang.

Your retort is replete with what lies between your ears and provides nothing no empirical.

Except Clinton actually did sleep with women he knew.

And Trump has unprotected sex with porn stars and Playboy bunnies. And has paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars.

That's just the way it is. Them's the facts.

Slick Willie dumped $850k on Paula Jones to get her to go away. I guess you have selective recall.

The judge in the Jones case later ruled the Lewinsky matter immaterial, and threw out the case in April 1998 on the grounds that Jones had failed to show any damages. After Jones appealed, Clinton agreed in November 1998 to settle the case for $850,000 while still admitting no wrongdoing.[6]

 

[sealybobo]

Clinton had sex with woman he knew.

Trump had unprotected sex with nasty porn stars, strumpets, tarts and tramps and spent maybe millions for a little 'tang.

I assume you are using sarcasm.

Your scumbag is much less scummy.

At least Bill Clinton doesn’t fantasize about his daughter

Clinton, even counting private transgressions, tried to do what was best for the country, while the orange whore seeks to destroy it. Moreover, Clinton didn't align himself with a wave of cheap trash punks who have done nothing but bitch, scream, and whine about sex and try to tell Americans when, how, and with whom to have it, while bedding everyone available and then getting "blessed" by these fools and then endorsing for the Senate some little bitch who ran around shopping malls chasing teenagers.

Clinton was popular moreso than any recent President. He could have looked the American People in the eye and said “I did have sex with that woman” and his ratings still would have been in tact. Therein lies the difference. Clinton gets a pass.

A pass on lying about cheating on your wife?

Both trump and Clinton did it but Clinton got impeached and disbarred. That’s a pass?

Clinton also got you judging him. Trump gets a pass from you

Hahaha- silly liberal still thinks it was spooge on a dress that got Willie impeached. Sorry sport, you can cheat on your wife and get away with it, but lie to a grand jury about it and there will be consequences. History can be a bitch to the less informed.

As long as trump avoids a grand jury you’re ok with him lying to you. Got it

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

What’s the difference?

130k

That's a relatively cheap piece of ass considering the cost of marriage...

Yes it is.View attachment 191920

BAM!

lol

 

[Siete]

Bill got a drive by BJ in his office -

Trump went to Russia and porked hookers all weekend - had a long term affair with a playboy bunny - and screwed a well known porn star

Clinton got impeached for lying about it

Trump gets his ass licked for lying about it.

Whats the difference ???????????

why nothing, nothing at all.

FUMBDUCKS.

 

[Care4all]

pay to play applies to only one of the two....

urge for the most risky women, getting the girl for whom other men dream about having for a night... applies to one of the two.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

pay to play applies to only one of the two....

urge for the most risky women, getting the girl for whom other men dream about having for a night... applies to one of the two.

Pussy is pussy despite your semantics.

 

[Siete]

pay to play applies to only one of the two....

urge for the most risky women, getting the girl for whom other men dream about having for a night... applies to one of the two.

Pussy is pussy despite your semantics.

keep telling yourself that after lockdown.

 

[HenryBHough]

Another difference: Bill had one wife, Trump's had three! So far...

And Slick's not dumping the bitch after a 30-day free trial is testimony to his low IQ.

 

[Markle]

Clinton, even counting private transgressions, tried to do what was best for the country, while the orange whore seeks to destroy it. Moreover, Clinton didn't align himself with a wave of cheap trash punks who have done nothing but bitch, scream, and whine about sex and try to tell Americans when, how, and with whom to have it, while bedding everyone available and then getting "blessed" by these fools and then endorsing for the Senate some little bitch who ran around shopping malls chasing teenagers.

Your obvious panic and desperation is duly noted!

Neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton aligned themselves with cheap garbage yelling "morality" at Americans. They are not guilty of that and the orange whore in the Oval Office is. They never sent a group of whores over to HHS to destroy birth-control and sex education programs that were helping Americans to avoid unwanted pregnancies and STDs and waste our tax money on their ignorant shit. He event sent his vice-whore over to Congress to deny funding for the good work of Planned Parenthood. These people want to strip us of our freedom and drag us all into the cesspool they live in.They want more unwanted pregnancies, more STDs, more abortions, more abandoned children, more forced sex, and more divorces, as well as more cancer, and much less availability of medical care for all of us. I never thought that I would see such filth gain a foothold in the U.S. This is no way for an advanced and intelligent society to act.

It's not "desperation." It's pure disgust at the low level to which government has sunk and the degradation it intends.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

What’s the difference?

love the avatar bro

 

[Markle]

Maybe a wolf's in sheep's clothing. HIllary was certainly a wolf in wolf's clothing.


What were we supposed to do? Vote for fucking Hillary?

You should have voted for an actual conservative Republican in the primaries instead of Trump.

Now how hard was that to figure out, really. I can't believe this actually stumped you.

Trump's platform was infinitely better than his opponents, even in the primaries.


And most of the others were establishment republicans who have proved that they will NOT keep their promises on immigration or trade.


SO, fuck them. All.

In a way I agree. I hope all politicians got the message.

But then what message did trump teach them? The best liar wins. And stoke people’s fears

Trump ran on trade and immigration. Those are valid issues and not "stoking people's fears".


Hillary ran on him being a fucking nazi, and starting a nuclear war.


THAT'S stroking people's fears.


Trump's message is that addressing the valid concerns of working class whites is a good way to get them to vote for you, while ignoring them is not.

We all believed with demographics changing 2016 would be conservatives last horah. Had trump didn’t tweet and pull bullshit moves all the time he would have been a shoe in for re election. I might not like the tax bill or Supreme Court appointee but I could forgive those things. It’s all the other stuff that tells me he’s corrupt and a liar.

And there’s stuff I like. But I’ll be glad to have a democrat back in the White House. Admittedly not a Clinton. But Michelle obama would be good

Michele Obama, the same level of experience and ability as her husband and we know how that worked out.

 

[Markle]

You guys argued with us when we said no wmds. When trump said it you voted for him

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”

- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003


"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.

Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)



He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.



And then the Obama administration wanted to TAKE CREDIT for the Iraq war…whew….

###

 

[deanrd]

Well the myth that republicans are for family and religious values has been obliterated. I'm sure they will still claim they are though since they live in their own fake reality.

Actually, many Trump voters still believe that. They simply forgive Trump and his swamp creatures.

 

[deanrd]

You should have voted for an actual conservative Republican in the primaries instead of Trump.

Now how hard was that to figure out, really. I can't believe this actually stumped you.

Trump's platform was infinitely better than his opponents, even in the primaries.


And most of the others were establishment republicans who have proved that they will NOT keep their promises on immigration or trade.


SO, fuck them. All.

In a way I agree. I hope all politicians got the message.

But then what message did trump teach them? The best liar wins. And stoke people’s fears

Trump ran on trade and immigration. Those are valid issues and not "stoking people's fears".


Hillary ran on him being a fucking nazi, and starting a nuclear war.


THAT'S stroking people's fears.


Trump's message is that addressing the valid concerns of working class whites is a good way to get them to vote for you, while ignoring them is not.

We all believed with demographics changing 2016 would be conservatives last horah. Had trump didn’t tweet and pull bullshit moves all the time he would have been a shoe in for re election. I might not like the tax bill or Supreme Court appointee but I could forgive those things. It’s all the other stuff that tells me he’s corrupt and a liar.

And there’s stuff I like. But I’ll be glad to have a democrat back in the White House. Admittedly not a Clinton. But Michelle obama would be good

Michele Obama, the same level of experience and ability as her husband and we know how that worked out.

Happily married couple with two nice kids?

 

[LuckyDuck]

What’s the difference?

One, the Dimocrats liked.
The other, the Dimocrats hate.