Clinton Cash - The Book!

[Moonglow]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

Books are for old people...The younger generation has no interest in printed material for consumption...

 

[Moonglow]

Now we know why Hillary wiped her email server clean!

No, you don't...Only she does....

 

[boedicca]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

I hope it has an impact on the moderate independents who will decide the election. The Obama Administration is not going to prosecute the Clintons; the Dems will circle the wagons.

But, do regular Americans want to live through the inevitable unseemly sleaze of another Clinton presidency?

 

[boedicca]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

Books are for old people...The younger generation has no interest in printed material for consumption...

What a blithering moron. Kindle. Ever heard of it?

 

[Moonglow]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

I hope it has an impact on the moderate independents who will decide the election. The Obama Administration is not going to prosecute the Clintons; the Dems will circle the wagons.

But, do regular Americans want to live through the inevitable unseemly sleaze of another Clinton presidency?

It's the economy stupid-Bill Clinton....

 

[boedicca]

Now we know why Hillary wiped her email server clean!

No, you don't...Only she does....

I smell the flop sweat of Moonbat Desperation!

 

[The Rabbi]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

I hope it has an impact on the moderate independents who will decide the election. The Obama Administration is not going to prosecute the Clintons; the Dems will circle the wagons.

But, do regular Americans want to live through the inevitable unseemly sleaze of another Clinton presidency?

The hardcore doesnt care. Hillary is their bitch and they'll vote for her even if she committed murder on the campaign trail. They'll claim "people commit murder every day so it's no big deal."
Look at the pathetic Moonbeam in this thread. Hillary is basically selling her services to foreign governments while she is SoS and he doesnt see anything wrong with it.

 

[boedicca]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

I hope it has an impact on the moderate independents who will decide the election. The Obama Administration is not going to prosecute the Clintons; the Dems will circle the wagons.

But, do regular Americans want to live through the inevitable unseemly sleaze of another Clinton presidency?

It's the economy stupid-Bill Clinton....

Well, the economy sucks under Obama, so that ain't gonna help Hillary!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

 

[Moonglow]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

Books are for old people...The younger generation has no interest in printed material for consumption...

What a blithering moron. Kindle. Ever heard of it?

I have a kindle fire as does my son, yet he has no books on it to read...PC gaming is what the younger generation are interested in...

 

[boedicca]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

Books are for old people...The younger generation has no interest in printed material for consumption...

What a blithering moron. Kindle. Ever heard of it?

I have a kindle fire as does my son, yet he has no books on it to read...PC gaming is what the younger generation are interested in...

What an odd thing to brag about.

 

[Moonglow]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

I hope it has an impact on the moderate independents who will decide the election. The Obama Administration is not going to prosecute the Clintons; the Dems will circle the wagons.

But, do regular Americans want to live through the inevitable unseemly sleaze of another Clinton presidency?

It's the economy stupid-Bill Clinton....

Well, the economy sucks under Obama, so that ain't gonna help Hillary!

I beg to differ....It's better now than when Boosh left office...

 

[Moonglow]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

Books are for old people...The younger generation has no interest in printed material for consumption...

What a blithering moron. Kindle. Ever heard of it?

I have a kindle fire as does my son, yet he has no books on it to read...PC gaming is what the younger generation are interested in...

What an odd thing to brag about.

What is so boastful about the statement?

 

[boedicca]

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

Books are for old people...The younger generation has no interest in printed material for consumption...

What a blithering moron. Kindle. Ever heard of it?

I have a kindle fire as does my son, yet he has no books on it to read...PC gaming is what the younger generation are interested in...

What an odd thing to brag about.

What is so boastful about the statement?

As making fun of members' children is verbotten, I cannot respond.

 

[The Rabbi]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

I hope it has an impact on the moderate independents who will decide the election. The Obama Administration is not going to prosecute the Clintons; the Dems will circle the wagons.

But, do regular Americans want to live through the inevitable unseemly sleaze of another Clinton presidency?

It's the economy stupid-Bill Clinton....

Well, the economy sucks under Obama, so that ain't gonna help Hillary!

I beg to differ....It's better now than when Boosh left office...

Wrong.
Only about the same number of people are working, despite increases in the workforce. Income is flat, wealth is flat. The average American thinks the recession never ended.

 

[Foxfyre]

The NYT is reporting on this book, hardly a RW mouth organ.

...
The book, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

His examples include a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation, development projects in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake in 2010, and more than $1 million in payments to Mr. Clinton by a Canadian bank and major shareholder in the Keystone XL oil pipeline around the time the project was being debated in the State Department....

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/u...estions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

I hope it has an impact on the moderate independents who will decide the election. The Obama Administration is not going to prosecute the Clintons; the Dems will circle the wagons.

But, do regular Americans want to live through the inevitable unseemly sleaze of another Clinton presidency?

Of course not but regular Americans aren't too successful in electing candidates these days. Who in a million years could have dreamed that Obama would be elected to a second term? And yet the Dems were able to buy and bribe and coerce enough votes to get it done via their surrogate media who so demonized Romney people became afraid of him and via empty promises that Americans are gullible enough to keep believing.

So don't underestimate the electability of the Queen apparent. The D after her name is sufficient to make her a formidable opponent against anybody.

 

[Moonglow]

Do you really think it will make a difference? All this stuff is coming out now, 19 months before the election, and in a few months will all be forgotten and everybody will have moved on. And when Hillary's opponents try to bring it up when the campaign starts seriously heating up, it will be declared old news--beating a dead horse--and all that.

The Democrats tend to set the bar very very low in what they want re ethics and a moral center in their candidates. And most don't read books or the New York Times or any other serious publications. So the only ones who will care are those who wouldn't vote for Hillary in any case.

I hope it has an impact on the moderate independents who will decide the election. The Obama Administration is not going to prosecute the Clintons; the Dems will circle the wagons.

But, do regular Americans want to live through the inevitable unseemly sleaze of another Clinton presidency?

It's the economy stupid-Bill Clinton....

Well, the economy sucks under Obama, so that ain't gonna help Hillary!

I beg to differ....It's better now than when Boosh left office...

Wrong.
Only about the same number of people are working, despite increases in the workforce. Income is flat, wealth is flat. The average American thinks the recession never ended.

You have more people living now than in 2009...I for one enjoy not working ....You have more people retiring now due to the Baby Boomers...Wealth is flat, not to the 1%, workers are getting increases....Sounds better to me....but I am an optimist...

 

[The Rabbi]

I hope it has an impact on the moderate independents who will decide the election. The Obama Administration is not going to prosecute the Clintons; the Dems will circle the wagons.

But, do regular Americans want to live through the inevitable unseemly sleaze of another Clinton presidency?

It's the economy stupid-Bill Clinton....

Well, the economy sucks under Obama, so that ain't gonna help Hillary!

I beg to differ....It's better now than when Boosh left office...

Wrong.
Only about the same number of people are working, despite increases in the workforce. Income is flat, wealth is flat. The average American thinks the recession never ended.

You have more people living now than in 2009...I for one enjoy not working ....You have more people retiring now due to the Baby Boomers...

Another liberal meme. You ae of course wrong.

 

[Moonglow]

It's the economy stupid-Bill Clinton....

Well, the economy sucks under Obama, so that ain't gonna help Hillary!

I beg to differ....It's better now than when Boosh left office...

Wrong.
Only about the same number of people are working, despite increases in the workforce. Income is flat, wealth is flat. The average American thinks the recession never ended.

You have more people living now than in 2009...I for one enjoy not working ....You have more people retiring now due to the Baby Boomers...

Another liberal meme. You ae of course wrong.

No I am not..The population is more now than in 2008...The Baby Boomers are the largest generation group in the US..

 

[mudwhistle]

Mr. Clinton would routinely fetch half-a-million dollar honorariums for speeches while Mrs. Clinton was Secretary of State

nothing wrong with that...it's done by politicians all the time...

The reason he got that money is what's wrong about it.

It's all about peddling influence for cash from foreign interests.
What Is Racketeering with pictures

Even Putin commented on it.......essentially saying it was dangerous.