🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

CNN Ana Navaroo defends Antifa usage of flamethrowers against whites

Violence? I've had one fight in my life and that was in the 8th grade. Kicked the bully's ass something fierce too.
.

No you didn't...If it happened at all, which I doubt, you got the snot beat out of you and ran home to your mommy.
lol.gif
 
The Nazis and the KKK should be treated as ISIS they are hate groups and terrorists. I'm surprised that they roam freely in the US.

They already are. Antifa and BLM need to be added.
 
View attachment 144174
Sick. CNN’s Ana Navarro Defends Antifa Terrorists Hurling Bricks, Using Flame Throwers on Protesters (Video)

Charlottesville_flame_thrower.jpg


Ana Navarro:
No, no, no, no. You can’t say this is both sides of violence. What we saw was some white supremacists and then what we saw was some brave people risking their lives and putting themselves in between white supremacists and what they were doing.
There is not a single thing Ana said that wasn't reasonable.
I'd fight with my last dying breath against you nazis and white supremacists.


So I guess he is not a democrat as y'all parallel Nazi's. To a T except for the Jew killing.... For now anyway.

fascism

[fash-iz-uh m]
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
noun
1.
(sometimes initial capital letter) a governmentalsystem led by a dictator having complete power,forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism,regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., andemphasizing an aggressive nationalism and oftenracism.
2.
(sometimes initial capital letter) the philosophy,principles, or methods of fascism.
3.
(initial capital letter) a political movement thatemploys the principles and methods of fascism,especially the one established by Mussolini inItaly 1922–43.
Explore Dictionary.com
 
Sick. CNN’s Ana Navarro Defends Antifa Terrorists Hurling Bricks, Using Flame Throwers on Protesters (Video)

Charlottesville_flame_thrower.jpg


Ana Navarro:
No, no, no, no. You can’t say this is both sides of violence. What we saw was some white supremacists and then what we saw was some brave people risking their lives and putting themselves in between white supremacists and what they were doing.

You are a lying little weasel. The fact is that the man was defending himself. His friend was beaten by white supremacists. That is okay for you. You are a racist pig.

Charlottesville: Man pictured using homemade flame thrower on white supremacists speaks out
 
The white supremacists had a permit to protest. CNN does not believe in democracy or freedom of speech.

There is nothing heroic about beating people up who voluntarily organize.
Lying fuck. It was nazi riot.
Of course you stick up for your brotherhood.

Nope, they indeed had a permit.

The attackers did not have such thing, they just decided to show up and start beating people up, hard-left style. A bit unfortunate that one of the Hitler sympathizers decided to rush for an escape killing one of the attackers in the process.

Anyway, the people standing for national socialism had full rights to defend themselves, even if you don't agree what they have to say.

The fact is that they did have a permit to counter protest a few blocks away. Also Emancipation Park was not closed during their protest. That means anyone had a right to come into the park and protest the protestors. They did not beat up anyone. The white supremacists killed 1 person and injured 18. A black man was beaten by white supremacists. Yet you go out of your way to defend white supremacists.

Analysis | President Trump’s false claim that counter-demonstrators lacked a permit
 
The white supremacists had a permit to protest. CNN does not believe in democracy or freedom of speech.

There is nothing heroic about beating people up who voluntarily organize.
Lying fuck. It was nazi riot.
Of course you stick up for your brotherhood.

Nope, they indeed had a permit.

The attackers did not have such thing, they just decided to show up and start beating people up, hard-left style. A bit unfortunate that one of the Hitler sympathizers decided to rush for an escape killing one of the attackers in the process.

Anyway, the people standing for national socialism had full rights to defend themselves, even if you don't agree what they have to say.

The fact is that they did have a permit to counter protest a few blocks away. Also Emancipation Park was not closed during their protest. That means anyone had a right to come into the park and protest the protestors. They did not beat up anyone. The white supremacists killed 1 person and injured 18. A black man was beaten by white supremacists. Yet you go out of your way to defend white supremacists.

Analysis | President Trump’s false claim that counter-demonstrators lacked a permit

Did you miss the part where they said they had a permit for an area blocks away?
 
There is not a single thing Ana said that wasn't reasonable.
I'd fight with my last dying breath against you nazis and white supremacists.
But would you fight to the death to protect their right to speak?

That's the true test of political maturity. Can you tolerate the opposition's message and win the debate with ideas instead of violence?
Violence? I've had one fight in my life and that was in the 8th grade. Kicked the bully's ass something fierce too.
So you're talking to the wrong guy here. I make love not war.

I make an exception for Nazi fucks.
 
Sick. CNN’s Ana Navarro Defends Antifa Terrorists Hurling Bricks, Using Flame Throwers on Protesters (Video)

Charlottesville_flame_thrower.jpg


Ana Navarro:
No, no, no, no. You can’t say this is both sides of violence. What we saw was some white supremacists and then what we saw was some brave people risking their lives and putting themselves in between white supremacists and what they were doing.
They should have brought bigger and more powerful flamethrowers.

I'm sure CNN would agree.
 
You are a lying little weasel. The fact is that the man was defending himself.

Who comes prepared with a flame throwing device for "self-defense" ???

Just listen to his bullshit story in the link you gave me:
But the 23-year-old said the scene quickly turned violent when one of the thousands of extremists who had taken to the streets fired a gun next to his feet - while police nearby failed to react.

Another extremist later lunged at Mr Long with a confederate flag and he fought back with a spray can he said he found on the ground, putting a lighter to the nozzle and turning it into a weapon.

1: Police are most certainly going to react to bullets being fired.
2: Does he find this spray while he's being attacked by a flag [UNLIKELY]? Or does he find it later and come back to spray them with fire?
3: Why does he have a lighter on him for this express purpose, he's obviously practiced and trained using spray cans as flamethrowers in the past. When I used a similar setup against honey bees under my facia board I had to practice a few times in my backyard.
4: If he never trained/practiced before with this type of weapon, then what would make him even think to use a random discarded spray can (which is normally empty when discarded) with a lighter to create a flame thrower?
5: Why would some one discard of a non-empty spray can? It's suspicious that the discarded can that he claims to have picked up had sufficient contents to create and maintain such a robust stream of fire.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top