CNN Bias / Incompetence Blows Up In Their Face: Trump Fact-Checkers Found Fact-LESS

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,157
2,645
CNN’s Clinton Cash ‘Fact-Check’ Ends in Embarrassment for Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel

These 2 Clown declared they had 'Fact Checked the already PROVEN story of how Hillary and her 'Charity' Organization was PAID $145 MILLION by 9 separate donors to approve the sale of 20% of the US' Uranium Supply to the Russians...and they declared the story to be 'unsubstantiated' - FALSE.

At this point, however, the FACTS they somehow miraculously missed came pouring out.....

-------------------------------

CNN Money’s “fact-checkers” Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel ended up with egg on their faces on Wednesday after they rated as “false” a well-established and proven Clinton Cash fact involving Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. approving the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to the Russian government, as nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Under the guise of “fact-checking” Donald Trump’s Wednesday speech, Alesci and Frankel purported to verify whether “Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20% of America’s uranium holdings to Russia while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.”

Since Alesci and Frankel appear unable to perform basic journalistic research, here are the names and amounts they are still waiting on the Clinton Foundation to get back to them on:
  • Frank Giustra, Canadian mining magnate who created a company that later merged with UraniumOne, gave $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million to the Clinton Foundation
  • Frank Holmes, a shareholder in the deal who donated between $250,000 and $500,000 (the Clinton Foundation doesn’t report exact amounts, only in ranges) and is a Clinton Foundation adviser
  • Neil Woodyer, Frank Giustra’s colleague who founded Endeavor Financial and pledged $500,000 as well as promises of “ongoing financial support”
  • Robert Disbrow, a Haywood Securities broker, the firm that provided “$58 million in capital to float shares of UrAsia’s private placement,” gave the Clinton’s family foundation between $1 and $5 million, according to Clinton Cash
  • Paul Reynolds, a Canaccord Capital Inc., executive who donated between $1 million and $5 million. “The UrAsia deal was the largest in Canaccord’s history,” reports Schweizer
  • Robert Cross, a major shareholder who serves as UrAsia Energy Director who pledged portions of his future income to the Clinton Foundation
  • Egizio Blanchini, “the Capital Markets vice chair and Global cohead of BMO’s Global Metals and Mining group, had also been an underwriter on the mining deals. BMO paid $600,000 for two tables at the CGS-GI’s March 2008 benefit”
  • Sergei Kurzin, the Russian rainmaker involved in the Kazakhstan uranium deal and a shareholder in UrAsia Energy, also pledged $1 million to the Foundation
  • Uranium One chairman Ian Telfer committed $2.35 million

Also, in addition to the $145 million being funneled to the Clinton Foundation before the CFIUS approval, why was a Kremlin-backed bank bankrolling a $500,000 speech in Moscow for Bill Clinton while his wife led the Russian reset? As even the progressive New Yorker magazine put it, “But there is a bigger question: Why was Bill Clinton taking any money from a bank linked to the Kremlin while his wife was Secretary of State?” Shockingly, CNN Money fact-checkers Alesci and Frankel make no mention of the Kremlin-backed $500,000 Clinton speaking payment."


CNN’s Clinton Cash ‘Fact-Check’ Ends in Embarrassment for Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel - Breitbart
 
I did not know INCOMPETENCE was a desired journalistic characteristic for reporters at CNN....
 
No, seriously Im asking...Is there anyone who can or will debunk Trump that you will not smear? Is anyones word good enough?

NO, SERIOUSLY...CNN FAILED miserably to 'debunk Trump'. All evidence not only supports that, but it also proves CNN deceitfully LIED, tried to 'smear' TRUMP! They were BUSTED...and just like with Hillary, you are trying to defend the people who are lying, deceiving, and proving they are corrupt and un-trustworthy.

How do you do that continuously? Do you have a conscience?
 
No, seriously Im asking...Is there anyone who can or will debunk Trump that you will not smear? Is anyones word good enough?

NO, SERIOUSLY...CNN FAILED miserably to 'debunk Trump'. All evidence not only supports that, but it also proves CNN deceitfully LIED, tried to 'smear' TRUMP! They were BUSTED...and just like with Hillary, you are trying to defend the people who are lying, deceiving, and proving they are corrupt and un-trustworthy.

How do you do that continuously? Do you have a conscience?

It's a symtom of brainwashing....classic stockholm syndrome. Most urban ppl, educated in public schools (especially in poor and/or minority schools) suffer from it.
 
No, seriously Im asking...Is there anyone who can or will debunk Trump that you will not smear? Is anyones word good enough?

NO, SERIOUSLY...CNN FAILED miserably to 'debunk Trump'. All evidence not only supports that, but it also proves CNN deceitfully LIED, tried to 'smear' TRUMP! They were BUSTED...and just like with Hillary, you are trying to defend the people who are lying, deceiving, and proving they are corrupt and un-trustworthy.

How do you do that continuously? Do you have a conscience?


So thats a no...No one can debunk Trump. Awesome thanks.

I know not to waste my time here
 
So thats a no...No one can debunk Trump. Awesome thanks. I know not to waste my time here
Oh, I am sure IF he does lie and someone uses the fact to prove him wrong then the answer is 'yes'. CNN, however, has proven it won't be THEM because they are incapable of doing so....and you have proven you are incapable of NOT defending liars and deceivers. Is it SO hard for you to condemn those who GET CAUGHT lying and deceiving? If it is and you are determined to persist then yes it is a wate of your time coming 'here'.
 
It's interesting that low information lefties who used to rely on the Comedy Channel for political analysis now rely on the editorial page of the Tampa Bay Times for fact checking simply because the name "politifact" sounds so damn good.
 
It's interesting that low information lefties who used to rely on the Comedy Channel for political analysis now rely on the editorial page of the Tampa Bay Times for fact checking simply because the name "politifact" sounds so damn good.

Whats interesting is that you neither said the information was true or false. You didnt say Politifact was wrong or right.

The only thing you did is essentially go "Aha" and add and period on the end
 
This is nothing compared to the foul stench rising from the Clinton/Obama Iran Nuke also known as the Clinton/Obama Boeing/Iran jet deal worth billions. Corruption people are you paying attention yet?
 
Oh, I am sure IF he does lie and someone uses the fact to prove him wrong then the answer is 'yes'.
Trump said there is no drought in California. Was that the truth?
:wtf: Can't stay on the topic of CNN's UN-ethical attempt to smear Trump under the guise of 'Fact Checking' regarding Hillary SELLING her vote / compliance with selling Russia 20% of our uranium supply, huh?

I don't have a clue about the drought. I have not looked up any information about the drought. I prefer to stay on topic. If you want to start a new thread, provide a link to Trump saying there is no drought, and then provide a link proving he is wrong then GO FOR IT.

For now, however, CNN was stripped of it's reputation for journalistic integrity after being busted perpetrating this 'smear' on Trump by ignoring the documented and proven FACTS!
 
CNN’s Clinton Cash ‘Fact-Check’ Ends in Embarrassment for Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel

These 2 Clown declared they had 'Fact Checked the already PROVEN story of how Hillary and her 'Charity' Organization was PAID $145 MILLION by 9 separate donors to approve the sale of 20% of the US' Uranium Supply to the Russians...and they declared the story to be 'unsubstantiated' - FALSE.

At this point, however, the FACTS they somehow miraculously missed came pouring out.....

-------------------------------

CNN Money’s “fact-checkers” Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel ended up with egg on their faces on Wednesday after they rated as “false” a well-established and proven Clinton Cash fact involving Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. approving the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to the Russian government, as nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Under the guise of “fact-checking” Donald Trump’s Wednesday speech, Alesci and Frankel purported to verify whether “Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20% of America’s uranium holdings to Russia while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.”

Since Alesci and Frankel appear unable to perform basic journalistic research, here are the names and amounts they are still waiting on the Clinton Foundation to get back to them on:
  • Frank Giustra, Canadian mining magnate who created a company that later merged with UraniumOne, gave $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million to the Clinton Foundation
  • Frank Holmes, a shareholder in the deal who donated between $250,000 and $500,000 (the Clinton Foundation doesn’t report exact amounts, only in ranges) and is a Clinton Foundation adviser
  • Neil Woodyer, Frank Giustra’s colleague who founded Endeavor Financial and pledged $500,000 as well as promises of “ongoing financial support”
  • Robert Disbrow, a Haywood Securities broker, the firm that provided “$58 million in capital to float shares of UrAsia’s private placement,” gave the Clinton’s family foundation between $1 and $5 million, according to Clinton Cash
  • Paul Reynolds, a Canaccord Capital Inc., executive who donated between $1 million and $5 million. “The UrAsia deal was the largest in Canaccord’s history,” reports Schweizer
  • Robert Cross, a major shareholder who serves as UrAsia Energy Director who pledged portions of his future income to the Clinton Foundation
  • Egizio Blanchini, “the Capital Markets vice chair and Global cohead of BMO’s Global Metals and Mining group, had also been an underwriter on the mining deals. BMO paid $600,000 for two tables at the CGS-GI’s March 2008 benefit”
  • Sergei Kurzin, the Russian rainmaker involved in the Kazakhstan uranium deal and a shareholder in UrAsia Energy, also pledged $1 million to the Foundation
  • Uranium One chairman Ian Telfer committed $2.35 million

Also, in addition to the $145 million being funneled to the Clinton Foundation before the CFIUS approval, why was a Kremlin-backed bank bankrolling a $500,000 speech in Moscow for Bill Clinton while his wife led the Russian reset? As even the progressive New Yorker magazine put it, “But there is a bigger question: Why was Bill Clinton taking any money from a bank linked to the Kremlin while his wife was Secretary of State?” Shockingly, CNN Money fact-checkers Alesci and Frankel make no mention of the Kremlin-backed $500,000 Clinton speaking payment."


CNN’s Clinton Cash ‘Fact-Check’ Ends in Embarrassment for Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel - Breitbart

by breitbart?

:rofl:

damn, you don't care what lies you post,
 
Someone point me to the Mainstream Media's fact checkers fact checking Hillary's speeches.

She addressed this in her press conference..... OH WAIT, she hasn't held a press conference in AGES!
 
damn, you don't care what lies you post,

It's 'cute' watching liberals so desperate because they can not produce any actual FACTS to defend their arguments or corrupt politicians having to resort to the weak-ass 'Oh, I declare your source is not valid because I said so.' It reminds me oh a catfish on a hook, how it wiggles and thrashes while making that whiny, grunting sound. :p
 

Forum List

Back
Top