CNN sensors hero who saved baby. LOL at their stupid sheep. Pravda media folks.

[Theowl32]

Original report from CNN.



Here is the next report.... Watch what miraculously happens to his Trump 2016 shirt.

 

[bullwinkle]

Original report from CNN.



Here is the next report.... Watch what miraculously happens to his Trump 2016 shirt.

So is the first video from CNN? If so, isn't that a political T-shirt? If you saw it on CNN, how can you claim censorship? Slow day?

 

[koshergrl]

Original report from CNN.



Here is the next report.... Watch what miraculously happens to his Trump 2016 shirt.

So is the first video from CNN? If so, isn't that a political T-shirt? If you saw it on CNN, how can you claim censorship? Slow day?

Are you that stupid?

 

[Theowl32]

Original report from CNN.



Here is the next report.... Watch what miraculously happens to his Trump 2016 shirt.

So is the first video from CNN? If so, isn't that a political T-shirt? If you saw it on CNN, how can you claim censorship? Slow day?

Holy shit.

 

[BluesLegend]

CNN later admitted it was wrong to blur out the Trump 2016 on his shirt, they said it was a "mistake". Only after being caught and called out on their blatant bias of course. I told you people the left are lying filth.

 

[jknowgood]

Original report from CNN.



Here is the next report.... Watch what miraculously happens to his Trump 2016 shirt.

So is the first video from CNN? If so, isn't that a political T-shirt? If you saw it on CNN, how can you claim censorship? Slow day?

Can you use the bathroom by yourself?

 

[MisterBeale]

Wow. That's the type of crap that will get folks that don't care for either candidate to vote Trump.

When he says the media is corrupt, there is the proof.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Original report from CNN.



Here is the next report.... Watch what miraculously happens to his Trump 2016 shirt.

So is the first video from CNN? If so, isn't that a political T-shirt? If you saw it on CNN, how can you claim censorship? Slow day?

Because the first time was live....the next time they could doctor it...which they did.

 

[Leweman]

WOW. That is really freaking scary.

 

[MisterBeale]

WOW. That is really freaking scary.

It is. Folks that are awake and aware know this. It is almost pointless to vote. That is why it was doubly scary when the establishment (DHS) told us they are going to control the voting process. Hell, they are the ones that are controlling the media. So now, what is the point of voting if they are the ones conditioning the way voters perceive reality? If the voters don't perceive reality "the right way" according to the establishment, well, now it seems, the establishment can just choose to keep some polling stations open longer than others, or choose to count some votes and not others. It's the way the elites have always done things.

Truth, War Propaganda, CIA and Media Manipulation
http://www.globalresearch.ca/truth-propaganda-and-media-manipulation/23868

The mainstream media is the most obvious in its inherent bias and manipulation. The mainstream media is owned directly by large multinational corporations, and through their boards of directors are connected with a plethora of other major global corporations and elite interests. An example of these connections can be seen through the board of Time Warner.


Time Warner owns Time Magazine, HBO, Warner Bros., and CNN, among many others. The board of directors includes individuals past or presently affiliated with: the Council on Foreign Relations, the IMF, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Warburg Pincus, Phillip Morris, and AMR Corporation, among many others.


Two of the most “esteemed” sources of news in the U.S. are the New York Times (referred to as “the paper of record”) and the Washington Post. The New York Times has on its board people who are past or presently affiliated with: Schering-Plough International (pharmaceuticals), the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Chevron Corporation, Wesco Financial Corporation, Kohlberg & Company, The Charles Schwab Corporation, eBay Inc., Xerox, IBM, Ford Motor Company, Eli Lilly & Company, among others. Hardly a bastion of impartiality.


And the same could be said for the Washington Post, which has on its board: Lee Bollinger, the President of Columbia University and former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and individuals associated with (past or presently): the Coca-Cola Company, New York University, Conservation International, the Council on Foreign Relations, Xerox, Catalyst, Johnson & Johnson, Target Corporation, RAND Corporation, General Motors, and the Business Council, among others.


It is also important to address how the mainstream media is intertwined, often covertly and secretly, with the government. Carl Bernstein, one of the two Washington Post reporters who covered the Watergate scandal, revealed that there were over 400 American journalists who had “secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency.” Interestingly, “the use of journalists has been among the most productive means of intelligence-gathering employed by the CIA.” Among organizations which cooperated with the CIA were the “American Broadcasting Company, the National Broadcasting Company, the Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, the Miami Herald and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald-Tribune.”


By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York Times, CBS and Time Inc. The CIA even ran a training program “to teach its agents to be journalists,” who were “then placed in major news organizations with help from management.”


Elites Push Government-funded "Public" Media
Elites Push Government-funded "Public" Media
Elites Push Government-funded "Public" Media
Bollinger's appeal for a Mussolini-style public-private cartelized media is more fully explicated in his book, Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide-Open: A Free Press for a New Century published by Oxford University Press this year — to rave reviews and beaucoups favorable media coverage, naturally, from the usual intelligentsia who demand the right to forcibly extract from us the wherewithal to fund what they deem appropriate for us to read, watch, and listen to. Yes, the title and the content are an incredible, oxymoronic mismatch — like dry water or socialist free enterprise. But Bollinger's message resonates with the higher powers who seek to transform America. Within days after his WSJ editorial paean to the fascist-socialist-corporatist media model, Bollinger was voted in as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the New York Federal Reserve, the lead bank in the Federal Reserve System that has been fanatically pushing the fascist-socialist-corporatist model for all sectors of our economy.


Variations on Bollinger's government-must-save-journalism theme have been proliferating over the past year. The institutions, organs, and venues promoting it include: the USC/Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism, Nation magazine, the Aspen Institute, the Free Press, the Knight Foundation/Knight Commission, PBS, Rep. Henry Waxman, the Los Angeles Times, and the Columbia Journalism Review.
Elites Push Government-funded "Public" Media

The Pratt House Matrix and "Ruling Class Journalists"


Big Media has been the handmaiden to Big Government for decades. Now that the Internet and independent media are challenging the statist game plan, Big Media and Big Government are desperately seeking to formally legitimize their longstanding illicit affair. To longtime observers it is not in the least surprising that the key players in this perverse Big Government-Big Media-Big Foundation symbiosis seem to hale disproportionately from the membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).


Like the slime trail that leads to the slug, most of the major efforts to centralize, nationalize, and cartelize political and economic power over the past century can be traced back to the CFR and the matrix of corporations, foundations, think tanks, and universities its members dominate. So it is with the current push to have the federal government fund and control more and more of the media. Dr. Bollinger (of Columbia University and the Federal Reserve) is a CFR member. As are Alberto Ibarg?en, president and CEO of the Knight Foundation and Walter Isaacson, president and CEO of the Aspen Institute, key operatives leading the FOCAS campaign.



The CIA and the Media: 50 Facts the World Needs to Know
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-cia-and-the-media-50-facts-the-world-needs-to-know/5471956

Consider the coverups of election fraud in 2000 and 2004, the events of September 11, 2001, the invasions Afghanistan and Iraq, the destabilization of Syria, and the creation of “ISIS.” These are among the most significant events in recent world history, and yet they are also those much of the American public is wholly ignorant of. In an era where information and communication technologies are ubiquitous, prompting many to harbor the illusion of being well-informed, one must ask why this condition persists.

Further, why do prominent US journalists routinely fail to question other deep events that shape America’s tragic history over the past half century, such as the political assassinations of the 1960s, or the central role played by the CIA major role in international drug trafficking?

Popular and academic commentators have suggested various reasons for the almost universal failure of mainstream journalism in these areas, including newsroom sociology, advertising pressure, monopoly ownership, news organizations’ heavy reliance on “official” sources, and journalists’ simple quest for career advancement. There is also, no doubt, the influence of professional public relations maneuvers. Yet such a broad conspiracy of silence suggests another province of deception examined far too infrequently—specifically the CIA and similar intelligence agencies’ continued involvement in the news media to mold thought and opinion in ways scarcely imagined by the lay public.

World Class Journalist Admits Mainstream Media Is Completely Fake: “We All Lie For The CIA”
World Class Journalist Admits Mainstream Media Is Completely Fake: "We All Lie For The CIA"

According to a recent Gallup poll, only 4 out of 10 Americans trust the mass media. However, this ostensibly optimistic number is likely due to Americans simply distrusting the mainstream media sect which is not in line with their side of the two party paradigm.

Liberals have a hard time believing FOX News while conservatives have a hard time believing MSNBC. In the meantime, however, according to Dr. Ulfkotte, all of them are manipulating you, for the same goal — to sell you war.



This CIA operation began as the Cold War ramped up in the 1950’s. In an attempt to gather intelligence and influence public opinion, the CIA recruited journalists from across the United States. The program operated for nearly three decades and was deeply embedded in the fabric of American journalism. These compromised journalists provided the CIA direct access to some of the most prestigious media outlets in the country. The scope of the infiltration of the media was vast, encompassing newspapers, periodicals, press services, news agencies, radio and television stations, book publishers and foreign media outlets. A congressional investigation by the Church Committee exposed the vast propaganda program, stating:

“The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda.”

Respected journalist Carl Bernstein, writing about the depth of the CIA’s co-opting of media, wrote in Rollingstone in 1977:

“Some of these journalists’ relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine services — from simple intelligence-gathering to serving as go betweens with spies in Communist countries. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors without portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted – foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested in the derring-do of the spy business as in filing articles; and, the smallest category, full-time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad. In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements of America’s leading news organizations.”

As the Free Thought Project reported last year, leaked emails from the State Department revealed that Operation Mockingbird is alive and thriving in modern-day Police State USA.


Read more at World Class Journalist Admits Mainstream Media Is Completely Fake: "We All Lie For The CIA"

 

[bullwinkle]

Original report from CNN.



Here is the next report.... Watch what miraculously happens to his Trump 2016 shirt.

So is the first video from CNN? If so, isn't that a political T-shirt? If you saw it on CNN, how can you claim censorship? Slow day?

Are you that stupid?

Koshergirl, how did he know what was blotted out? I thought it was because he saw it on CNN before the blurred picture appeared. The blot is stupid in the first place, implying they don't want watchers to know a Trump supporter has a great heart, but my point is, he saw it on CNN.

 

[koshergrl]

Original report from CNN.



Here is the next report.... Watch what miraculously happens to his Trump 2016 shirt.

So is the first video from CNN? If so, isn't that a political T-shirt? If you saw it on CNN, how can you claim censorship? Slow day?

Are you that stupid?

Koshergirl, how did he know what was blotted out? I thought it was because he saw it on CNN before the blurred picture appeared. The blot is stupid in the first place, implying they don't want watchers to know a Trump supporter has a great heart, but my point is, he saw it on CNN.

Yes but how does the fact that it was on there for a few minutes before being censored, proof that it wasn't censored?

 

[koshergrl]

Stuff sneaks by censors all the time. That doesn't mean that later, when they remove it, that it hasn't been censored.

This is a basic thinking exercise. And you are not passing.

 

[bullwinkle]

Original report from CNN.



Here is the next report.... Watch what miraculously happens to his Trump 2016 shirt.

So is the first video from CNN? If so, isn't that a political T-shirt? If you saw it on CNN, how can you claim censorship? Slow day?

Are you that stupid?

Koshergirl, how did he know what was blotted out? I thought it was because he saw it on CNN before the blurred picture appeared. The blot is stupid in the first place, implying they don't want watchers to know a Trump supporter has a great heart, but my point is, he saw it on CNN.

Yes but how does the fact that it was on there for a few minutes before being censored, proof that it wasn't censored?

I wasn't clear. I never contested the censored part, and since I never watch CNN I have no idea how long before the Trump ad was blurred. But he did see the shirt ad on CNN...before the idiot crew took over.

 

[blastoff]

C'mon give CNN a break here. They're in a desperate battle with MSKFC for the ratings basement and need every edge they can conjure up.

Any doubt if the guy was wearing a Hillary 2016 t-shirt they would have added the audio, "I'm Hillary Clinton and I approve of this message?"