I agree with that, 100% but that's an argument AGAINST gun laws and not an argument Gun Law proponents are actually making in the counter-case.I never argued FOR gun laws, silly. Read with your analytical mind, not your emotional one. You made the correct inference and compared GUN CRIME change since the 2013 Law.Thats a strawman, though. Gun laws are supposed to curb GUN crime.You're the one playing games here. The lack of the prefix (gun) in the crime isn't stopping the ACTUAL CRIME.Thats disengenuous.
In order to have stronger arguments, you use charitable interpretations of opposing arguments.
Here, youre acting like gun laws are supposed to do anything other than curb GUN crime.
Thats being fake.
So, in order to do your analysis like a grown up...youd compare gun crime to the date the law took effect. Instead, you continue to do the little bot partisan dogshit.
It makes people act fake. Youre acting fake.
You want an analysis? Here:
The universal background check law was passed in 2013: Colorado approves universal background checks for gun purchases
Now read this, from September 2019: Gun violence against Denver teens, children is increasing
Quote:
"The newspaper said its analysis showed 15 teens and children have been shot and killed in the city since Jan. 1, 2018, more than in the previous three years combined."
...
"Prosecutors said 107 teens were charged with gun possession in 2018, compared with 50 in 2015. This year is on pace to equal or surpass last year."
How is this possible, moron? Gun laws are supposed to stop gun crime, right? Universal background checks will prevent unqualified people from obtaining guns, RIGHT?
We do this dance with you dumb twats every single time a new gun law is proposed/passed, and every fucking time we're proven right. When are you going to pull your heads out of your collective asses?
Grampy wamp compared it to overall crime, aka a non-sequitur.
Do you follow?
in fairness there’s the argument that gun laws come with the untented consequences of increases in violent crimes because people cannot adequately defend themselves.
I agree with that line of thought, too, by the way.