Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No, these leaks were ILLEGAL - CRIMINAL! If he took them seriously he would recommend charges be brought against those that did the leaking.Comey replied, "Leaks are terrible and taken very seriously," before adding that “there’s a whole lot of wrong information” in newspapers," and saying he did not want to "compound the offense that’s committed.
Gee, I'm sorry you don't know the difference between fact and opinion. Get your parents to explain it to you.Yes, dope. They concluded that the Russians did indeed hack political organizations and used WL to release it in a way that was meant to influence our electoral process.No, it hasn't been "proven", it's been "concluded". It's also been concluded that OTHER countries hacked us. They only focus on Russia to bolster the partisan claim that Trump colluded with them. Did he "collude" with China too, or Israel? Why isn't that charge being made?Not going to happen......
Let's say the Russians interferred and it could be proven.
Trump stays president.
It has been proven.
The only questions left are concerning the nature of the relationships between Trump's people and the Russians.
Everyone in that hearing room is operating under that fact.
I don't know what you are trying to say about "proof", but it is accepted as fact.
The fact that they all agree is as much proof you will ever get.
Yes, dope. They concluded that the Russians did indeed hack political organizations and used WL to release it in a way that was meant to influence our electoral process.No, it hasn't been "proven", it's been "concluded". It's also been concluded that OTHER countries hacked us. They only focus on Russia to bolster the partisan claim that Trump colluded with them. Did he "collude" with China too, or Israel? Why isn't that charge being made?Not going to happen......
Let's say the Russians interferred and it could be proven.
Trump stays president.
It has been proven.
The only questions left are concerning the nature of the relationships between Trump's people and the Russians.
Everyone in that hearing room is operating under that fact.
I don't know what you are trying to say about "proof", but it is accepted as fact.
The fact that they all agree is as much proof you will ever get.
No, these leaks were ILLEGAL - CRIMINAL!Comey replied, "Leaks are terrible and taken very seriously," before adding that “there’s a whole lot of wrong information” in newspapers," and saying he did not want to "compound the offense that’s committed.
He doesn't want to 'compound the offense that has been committed'? The 'offense' was a CRIME! I am sick of this useless, political F*! Throw his ass in jail ASAP.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has begun the confirmation hearings for Neil Gorsuch, popular vote loser Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee. But they should stop early and postpone the process because of today’s revelation from FBI Director James Comey that there is an ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and—critically—"the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts."
Moments before Comey's opening statement Monday morning, Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley confidently tweeted:
Follow
ChuckGrassley
✔@ChuckGrassley
After Comey briefing + doc review I can say @POTUS and Clapper R both right about this No evidence of Trump collusion w Russia
10:08 AM - 20 Mar 2017
Clearly, Grassley wasn't listening during the briefing or reading those documents correctly. Because the FBI is clearly still investigating that possibility.
And with that big, black cloud hanging over the Trump regime, the last thing the Senate should be doing is considering a lifetime nomination to the Supreme Court. The legitimacy of this presidential regime is now in serious question, and this nomination should be, too.
Comey revelation changes everything, Senate should postpone Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination hearing
"In light of Clapper’s statement that no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians was found and the (ILLEGAL) rash of anti-Trump intelligence leaks after the election, there are serious questions as to whether these warrants were sought by Obama officials to conduct fishing expeditions to find information to hurt Trump’s presidential bid.
There also is the question of the leaking of NSA reports of Russian communications that “incidentally” mentioned Trump campaign officials, including retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn and possibly then-Sen. Jeff Sessions, now the attorney general. Is the FBI investigating these leaks? Were they part of a broad effort by the Obama administration to cull though NSA reports on Russian officials to find references to Trump campaign staff that they could leak to the news media?
A related question: when NSA intercepts of foreign persons incidentally mention U.S. citizens, the names of the U.S. citizens are “minimized” with anonymous references. However, senior U.S. officials are permitted to ask NSA to reveal the names of Americans minimized in NSA reporting.
On March 15, 2017, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and ranking member Adam Schiff, D-Calif., requested the names of Obama officials who sought the identities of Americans mentioned in intelligence reporting be “de-minimized” during the last seven months of the Obama administration. Will Comey tell the committee Monday which Obama officials requested that the names of Trump campaign aides mentioned in NSA reports be “de-minimized?”
What meltdown?Nice meltdown.
Which is why he needs to be not only fired but also brought up on charges."In light of Clapper’s statement that no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians was found and the (ILLEGAL) rash of anti-Trump intelligence leaks after the election, there are serious questions as to whether these warrants were sought by Obama officials to conduct fishing expeditions to find information to hurt Trump’s presidential bid.
There also is the question of the leaking of NSA reports of Russian communications that “incidentally” mentioned Trump campaign officials, including retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn and possibly then-Sen. Jeff Sessions, now the attorney general. Is the FBI investigating these leaks? Were they part of a broad effort by the Obama administration to cull though NSA reports on Russian officials to find references to Trump campaign staff that they could leak to the news media?
A related question: when NSA intercepts of foreign persons incidentally mention U.S. citizens, the names of the U.S. citizens are “minimized” with anonymous references. However, senior U.S. officials are permitted to ask NSA to reveal the names of Americans minimized in NSA reporting.
On March 15, 2017, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and ranking member Adam Schiff, D-Calif., requested the names of Obama officials who sought the identities of Americans mentioned in intelligence reporting be “de-minimized” during the last seven months of the Obama administration. Will Comey tell the committee Monday which Obama officials requested that the names of Trump campaign aides mentioned in NSA reports be “de-minimized?”
No, he won't. I keep telling you guys what his function is. Comey is The Deep State\Establishement Protector. He is a Sweeper. He cleans up the messes and makes them disappear.
Yeah, well, that's not enough, pal.The fact that they all agree is as much proof you will ever get.
Which is why he needs to be not only fired but also brought up on charges."In light of Clapper’s statement that no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians was found and the (ILLEGAL) rash of anti-Trump intelligence leaks after the election, there are serious questions as to whether these warrants were sought by Obama officials to conduct fishing expeditions to find information to hurt Trump’s presidential bid.
There also is the question of the leaking of NSA reports of Russian communications that “incidentally” mentioned Trump campaign officials, including retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn and possibly then-Sen. Jeff Sessions, now the attorney general. Is the FBI investigating these leaks? Were they part of a broad effort by the Obama administration to cull though NSA reports on Russian officials to find references to Trump campaign staff that they could leak to the news media?
A related question: when NSA intercepts of foreign persons incidentally mention U.S. citizens, the names of the U.S. citizens are “minimized” with anonymous references. However, senior U.S. officials are permitted to ask NSA to reveal the names of Americans minimized in NSA reporting.
On March 15, 2017, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and ranking member Adam Schiff, D-Calif., requested the names of Obama officials who sought the identities of Americans mentioned in intelligence reporting be “de-minimized” during the last seven months of the Obama administration. Will Comey tell the committee Monday which Obama officials requested that the names of Trump campaign aides mentioned in NSA reports be “de-minimized?”
No, he won't. I keep telling you guys what his function is. Comey is The Deep State\Establishement Protector. He is a Sweeper. He cleans up the messes and makes them disappear.
The fact that they all agree is as much proof you will ever get.
The fact the hacking of the DNC and John Podestas e-mails is being investigated which is what Comey is referring to is the worst keep secret in Washington. I have no doubt to settle the matter they will look at the possibility of any Trump Russia connection even though as I'm typing this no evidence of any kind from anyone has been presented to support such a claim. I also have no doubt if the FBI finds nothing to support this claim the far left won't accept it.
Because it's all they have left.So comey has been clear that:
1) no evidence of collusion with the Russians
2) no evidence of the Russians hacking the election.
3) no evidence that WikiLeaks obtained any information from the Russians
4) no evidence that Russians hacked the DNC
But we should stop judge Gorsuch from being appointed because of these revelations.
Why?
The Senate Judiciary Committee has begun the confirmation hearings for Neil Gorsuch, popular vote loser Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee. But they should stop early and postpone the process because of today’s revelation from FBI Director James Comey that there is an ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and—critically—"the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts."
Moments before Comey's opening statement Monday morning, Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley confidently tweeted:
Follow
✔@ChuckGrassley
After Comey briefing + doc review I can say @POTUS and Clapper R both right about this No evidence of Trump collusion w Russia
10:08 AM - 20 Mar 2017
Clearly, Grassley wasn't listening during the briefing or reading those documents correctly. Because the FBI is clearly still investigating that possibility.
And with that big, black cloud hanging over the Trump regime, the last thing the Senate should be doing is considering a lifetime nomination to the Supreme Court. The legitimacy of this presidential regime is now in serious question, and this nomination should be, too.
Comey revelation changes everything, Senate should postpone Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination hearing
Its no accident that the Rs are pushing nominations through. So far, there has not been even one who is qualified and most have been proven to have purchased their position.
Gorsuch does not agree with the US Constitution and is in favor of sharia law.
You'd like that, wouldn't you? Not gonna happen. What we continue to hear is that there is STILL no evidence of collusion. It's becoming increasingly clear that the purpose of this investigation is to delegitimize this president and to manipulate public opinion.
Plenty of evidence against Hillary but indictment from Obama's DOJ. You and everyone else knows that too.So you believe that Hillary is a criminal, despite no evidence of wrong doing, but think Trump is innocent because the investigation is ongoing.
Translation:Delegitimization of a President who was elected with the help of the Russian government, didn't win the popular vote, and is doing a terrible job would seem to be a good idea.
