Commission on Presidential Debates Co-Chair: ABC Moderators ‘Bent Backwards to Help’ Harris, Were ‘Worst’ I’ve Seen'

Moderator: what didn't you stop the January 6th protestors

Trump: I tried but Nancy pelosi is in charge of that she wouldn't call the national guard and there is a video of her saying it

Moderator : we aren't talking about Nancy pelosi. Next question

Not word for word but still that's how it went. That lady was a nasty twat. Honestly this is the behavior I was expecting out of CNN when he went up against Biden.
CNN wanted Biden out of there so they didn't protect him. You saw the REAL liberal media at work in this debate. It was three against one...like watching a college sports team go up against another team at their field, officiated by their most rabid fans!
 
It's not the moderators.

It's Trump believing his own lies and saying them out loud.
 
What's really sad about that debate is that the Main Stream Media seems to have totally lost the concept that their purpose in a democracy is to inform the populace. Not cheer for one side or the other. We don't have journalism in the US anymore...maybe a few like Matt Taibbi...but they are few and far between. There are far too many that are willing to be mouthpieces for those in power. They've lost sight of what a journalist's job is in a democracy...namely to keep the wealthy and powerful in check.
 
The two ABC Moderators, were biased, rude and anti-Trumpers all while helping out Comrade Kamala Harris. It was so obvious they could care less what her answers were, they were out there to argue with Trump.

The first question they asked Harris was is the country better off now than four years ago? Then she started giving a bull$&*# answer and they let it go, probably weren’t even listening to her response. She didn’t answer the effing question.


The commission should give ABC a lifetime ban on hosting debates.
 
The two ABC Moderators, were biased, rude and anti-Trumpers all while helping out Comrade Kamala Harris. It was so obvious they could care less what her answers were, they were out there to argue with Trump.

The first question they asked Harris was is the country better off now than four years ago? Then she started giving a bull$&*# answer and they let it go, probably weren’t even listening to her response. She didn’t answer the effing question.


Fake news bullshit OP's linking to breitbart ought to be put in with the junk threads.
From your own bullshit link....

On Wednesday’s broadcast of Newsmax TV’s “The Record,” Commission on Presidential Debates Co-Founder and Co-Chair Frank J. Fahrenkopf Jr., who also was Chair of the RNC, stated..... :laughing0301:
 
When should we expect to see some of that steady handed, gifted leadership that Taylor thinks Kamala provides? It's been almost four years and I haven't gotten a glimpse of anything from her that qualifies as "leadership"! She's as big a "weather vane" as Joe Biden...what ever way the political winds are blowing...that's the direction she'll be turning!

Look at your leadership

GOP Candidate Mark Robinson Called Self ‘Black Nazi’ On Porn Site​


“I like watching tranny on girl porn! That’s f*cking hot! It takes the man out while leaving the man in!” Robinson wrote. “And yeah I’m a ‘perv’ too!”

8 days ago look what I wrote. The state’s Republican Party has dismissed concerns that a poor showing by its gubernatorial nominee, Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, could harm the electoral chances of other party candidates, including Trump.

Now his turnout is going to be very very low. LOL
 
This has to have been the last try for fair presidential treatment in traditional MSM debates. I don’t think they’re capable

Republicans should demand more fair environments, no CNN, ABC, NBC etc debates. The legacy media is just Democrat Pravda activism
 
Look at your leadership

GOP Candidate Mark Robinson Called Self ‘Black Nazi’ On Porn Site​


“I like watching tranny on girl porn! That’s f*cking hot! It takes the man out while leaving the man in!” Robinson wrote. “And yeah I’m a ‘perv’ too!”

8 days ago look what I wrote. The state’s Republican Party has dismissed concerns that a poor showing by its gubernatorial nominee, Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, could harm the electoral chances of other party candidates, including Trump.

Now his turnout is going to be very very low. LOL
I don’t think you want to go down the rabbit hole of weirdness in candidates down ticket over the years.. as a Democrat you would lose, and lose handily

Anthony Weiner anyone?
 
If you live in “this moment only” land, yes.

But Democrats hate most of history for a reason.
We are progressives no doubt. Things can no doubt be better, more fair. At one time in America, when unions were strong, the middle class was BOOMING. Millionaires still got rich. But like every business owner, they want more. But we were so productive in the 90's there wasn't any way to SQUEEZE more profit out of what we were doing. UNLESS, they started sending good paying union jobs to Mexico. So they/you waged war on unions in the 2000's and Bush sent all our best jobs overseas. There's no question this happened. The only argument dummy Republicans have is "clinton signed nafta". Yea, but Clinton put worker and environmental protections in NAFTA that Bush, excuse me, Chaney removed in the 2000's. DEREGULATIONS! Remember them?

We hate what we did to the Indians, Blacks, Asians. And we strive to stop doing it. Today REPUBLICANS are doing it to "Haitians". We hate that and like Kamala said we aren't going back.
 
We hate what we did to the Indians, Blacks, Asians. And we strive to stop doing it. Today REPUBLICANS are doing it to "Haitians". We hate that and like Kamala said we aren't going back.
Yeah none of that is happening. No amount of fear-mongering and angry labeling of people makes it true.
 
Yeah none of that is happening. No amount of fear-mongering and angry labeling of people makes it true.

We hate what America DID to Indians. We hate what Republicans ARE DOING to poor black people through their economic policies.

Hey, I've said for years that to the rich, we are all n*#rs. Look at the state of blue collar whites in America


Remember ghettos and crack? Now it's suburbs and fentynol.

So we made crack available in the 80's to poor black communities who had no economic communities and we looked down on them. Today there is no economic opportunity for uneducated whites. Those union jobs are gone. Now we see them acting just like their ghetto counterparts.
 
We hate what America DID to Indians. We hate what Republicans ARE DOING to poor black people through their economic policies.

Hey, I've said for years that to the rich, we are all n*#rs. Look at the state of blue collar whites in America


Remember ghettos and crack? Now it's suburbs and fentynol.

So we made crack available in the 80's to poor black communities who had no economic communities and we looked down on them. Today there is no economic opportunity for uneducated whites. Those union jobs are gone. Now we see them acting just like their ghetto counterparts.
list these Republican economic policies keeping black folks down.
 
What do you mean go insolvent.

That is a huge lie.

When the trust fund runs out, benefits will be cut by 30%.

Can you ever stop lying ?

So if we vote for Republicans we can expect 30% cuts to social security? Wow! Put that on a bumper sticker.

I bet Democrats won't do that. I bet they'll tax the rich and corporations to fund it. Social Security and Medicare are two important/popular programs for a middle class.

We need to go after illegal employers and fine the shit out of them. Put that money in the fund. Then make their employees legal so they start paying taxes.
 
So if we vote for Republicans we can expect 30% cuts to social security? Wow! Put that on a bumper sticker.

I bet Democrats won't do that. I bet they'll tax the rich and corporations to fund it. Social Security and Medicare are two important/popular programs for a middle class.

We need to go after illegal employers and fine the shit out of them. Put that money in the fund. Then make their employees legal so they start paying taxes.

That seems like one of the more self-serving, blind, and stupid posts I'v read in a long time.

Want retirement.....SAVE.

SS was never supposed to be more than 30% of your portfolio. That is per the government.
 
That seems like one of the more self-serving, blind, and stupid posts I'v read in a long time.

Want retirement.....SAVE.

SS was never supposed to be more than 30% of your portfolio. That is per the government.

Yea because when they first gave us social security we were also getting pensions and paid better than we do now.

And I never said it should be 30% of your portfolio.

It's going to be 30% of my income. $60,000 a year interest off my $ and about $20,000 a year from Social Security. I don't want to touch my portfolio. I want it working for me when I retire.
 
Yea because when they first gave us social security we were also getting pensions and paid better than we do now.

And I never said it should be 30% of your portfolio.

It's going to be 30% of my income. $60,000 a year interest off my $ and about $20,000 a year from Social Security. I don't want to touch my portfolio. I want it working for me when I retire.

So, let trust fund exhaust and cut benefits.

What's the problem ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top