Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"...she was just appalled at the performance of the moderators."
The cry baby loser lost the election in 2020, and blamed mysterious election thieves, never concocting any evidence regarding who they were or how they pulled off such a monumental caper.As a precursor for this, I will just say shame on you pawns on the left, you are doing the bidding of the most evil people on the face of the earth, some of you knowingly and being paid, others just absolute sheep who simply turn on the propaganda machine of the mainstream news media, and be honest the news media in today's America, is nothing more than An example of what Joseph Goebbels said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it
‘Three Against One’: Megyn Kelly Unleashes On ‘Biased’ ABC Debate Moderators And Their ‘Full Of Sh*t’ Fact-Checks
Kelly unleashed a searing rebuke of ABC News following the presidential debate between Trump and Harris, accusing the network of blatant bias.www.mediaite.com
Conservative commentator Megyn Kelly unleashed on debate hosts ABC News following Tuesday’s showdown between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, saying she was “disgusted” as she accused the network of blatant bias in favor of the Democratic nominee.
“I’m disgusted. I’m ashamed of those moderators at ABC News,” Kelly declared in a post-debate monologue on her SiriusXM show. “It was three against one on that debate stage this evening.”
She continued: “This was a mistake to trust ABC News with this debate. The Republicans must learn from this mistake. The same way the Democrats never, never agree to do anything with moderators they don’t entirely trust. This should be the last time the Republicans ever do this. Because those two moderators tried to sink Donald Trump tonight.”
Rounding on ABC moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis while defending Trump’s more defensive moments, Kelly accused the pair of actively working to undermine the former president while giving Harris a free pass.
She continued: “Trump did the best he could under the circumstances, but it really was like three fighters in the ring against one opponent. And Trump tried to take them all on. He did fine. He did as best as he could. He was thrown a few times to the point where he was unnecessarily defensive and he was getting angry. And so was I.”
Kelly summarized her take on the “obvious tactic” used by ABC News: “‘Do you have any regrets or thoughts on how terrible you were?’ Trump answers. ‘Vice President Harris, how bad is Trump?’ And then she’d answer. It happened over and over again. That was the format. ‘Mr. Trump, you’re a piece of shit.’ ‘Kamala Harris, isn’t he a shit? Thank you.’ It was incredible.”
“Anything Trump said, fact check, fact check, fact check… and their fact checks were full of shit,” Kelly went on.
Her frustrations extended beyond the debate itself, calling out ABC News for a perceived conflict of interest, referencing Dana Walden, co-chair of ABC’s parent company Disney, and her personal ties to Harris.
“They did Dana Walden’s bidding tonight,” Kelly said.
In her closing remarks, Kelly said she believed that ABC’s debate event might ultimately backfire: “I actually think the American public is going to see through this, and there’s probably going to be some empathy for Trump.”
They are moderators.Actually, the mods did a pretty darn good job as journalists.
Pure garbage. If you think your so damn smart, why don't you call all the people (and there many including democrats) who say they did a piss-poor job and tell them they are wrong. Really not interested in your opinion (especially the ones (which is all of them) you don't back up.Asking probing questions of each candidate and then following up to gather context and relevance.
You can pull your head out of your ass and be grateful you have air to breath. If you think this is something to be grateful for, you are permanently brain damaged.And we, as consumers of journalism, can be thankful that this pair of journalist developed some of the context....which, by its nature,
No she didn't. They would not let her. They took all her thunder by doing her job for her.Thus his debate partner, Harris, shone in comparison.
Who watches the watchers?
~S~
Stick to the issue of the thread.The cry baby loser lost the election in 2020, and blamed mysterious election thieves, never concocting any evidence regarding who they were or how they pulled off such a monumental caper.
He lost the debate bigly, and can't admit that a woman he had mewled is "dumb as a rock" spanked his big, flabby ass so thoroughly, so he looks around and lashes out at two folks who corrected his lies about bad people eating pets and bad states murdering babies.
The grumpy old geezer publicly soiled himself, and has no one else to blame - although his desperate attempts to try are hardly surprising.
The Loser lost to Harris and needed somebody else to blame.Stick to the issue of the thread.
Nobody wants to hear your armchair quarterbacking BS.
--------------------They are moderators. Their job is to:
1. Ask questions
2. Keep time
3. Manage Balance
They DO NOT FACT CHECK. That is the job of the opponent.
Why the anger Hiker?"Cuck."
Well, I think that there is a plausible argument that Megan Kelly is hardly enough of a journalist to judge others who are more accomplished than her. If she was a better journalist, or even a journalist at all......she wouldn't have been bounced out of several 'journalist' opportunities.Kelly...was appalled that these so called journalists were even associated with this.
